Greenwood D C, Threapleton D E, Evans C E L, Cleghorn C L, Nykjaer C, Woodhead C, Burley V J
Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Level 8, Worsley Building, University of Leeds,LeedsLS2 9JT,UK.
Nutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds,LeedsLS2 9JT,UK.
Br J Nutr. 2014 Sep 14;112(5):725-34. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514001329. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
The intake of sugar-sweetened soft drinks has been reported to be associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes, but it is unclear whether this is because of the sugar content or related lifestyle factors, whether similar associations hold for artificially sweetened soft drinks, and how these associations are related to BMI. We aimed to conduct a systematic literature review and dose-response meta-analysis of evidence from prospective cohorts to explore these issues. We searched multiple sources for prospective studies on sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened soft drinks in relation to the risk of type 2 diabetes. Data were extracted from eleven publications on nine cohorts. Consumption values were converted to ml/d, permitting the exploration of linear and non-linear dose-response trends. Summary relative risks (RR) were estimated using a random-effects meta-analysis. The summary RR for sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened soft drinks were 1·20/330 ml per d (95 % CI 1·12, 1·29, P< 0·001) and 1·13/330 ml per d (95 % CI 1·02, 1·25, P= 0·02), respectively. The association with sugar-sweetened soft drinks was slightly lower in studies adjusting for BMI, consistent with BMI being involved in the causal pathway. There was no evidence of effect modification, though both these comparisons lacked power. Overall between-study heterogeneity was high. The included studies were observational, so their results should be interpreted cautiously, but findings indicate a positive association between sugar-sweetened soft drink intake and type 2 diabetes risk, attenuated by adjustment for BMI. The trend was less consistent for artificially sweetened soft drinks. This may indicate an alternative explanation, such as lifestyle factors or reverse causality. Future research should focus on the temporal nature of the association and whether BMI modifies or mediates the association.
据报道,摄入含糖软饮料会增加患2型糖尿病的风险,但尚不清楚这是由于糖含量还是相关的生活方式因素,人工甜味软饮料是否也存在类似关联,以及这些关联与体重指数(BMI)有何关系。我们旨在对前瞻性队列研究的证据进行系统的文献综述和剂量反应荟萃分析,以探讨这些问题。我们在多个来源中搜索了关于含糖和人工甜味软饮料与2型糖尿病风险关系的前瞻性研究。从9个队列的11篇出版物中提取数据。消费值转换为毫升/天,以便探索线性和非线性剂量反应趋势。使用随机效应荟萃分析估计汇总相对风险(RR)。含糖和人工甜味软饮料的汇总RR分别为每天1.20/330毫升(95%CI 1.12,1.29,P<0.001)和每天1.13/330毫升(95%CI 1.02,1.25,P=0.02)。在调整BMI的研究中,与含糖软饮料的关联略低,这与BMI参与因果途径一致。没有证据表明存在效应修正,尽管这两种比较的检验效能都不足。总体研究间异质性较高。纳入的研究为观察性研究,因此其结果应谨慎解释,但研究结果表明,摄入含糖软饮料与2型糖尿病风险呈正相关,经BMI调整后减弱。人工甜味软饮料的趋势不太一致。这可能表明存在其他解释,如生活方式因素或反向因果关系。未来的研究应关注这种关联的时间性质,以及BMI是否会改变或介导这种关联。