J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):2983-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.9070.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is established in the management of most resectable esophageal and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas. However, assessing the downstaging effects of chemotherapy and predicting response to treatment remain challenging, and the relative importance of tumor stage before and after chemotherapy is debatable.
We analyzed consecutive resections for esophageal or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas performed at two high-volume cancer centers in London between 2000 and 2010. After standard investigations and multidisciplinary team consensus, all patients were allocated a clinical tumor stage before treatment, which was compared with pathologic stage after surgical resection. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis.
Among 584 included patients, 400 patients (68%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with downstaged tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy experienced improved survival compared with patients without response (P < .001), and such downstaging (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.59) was the strongest independent predictor of survival after adjusting for patient age, tumor grade, clinical tumor stage, lymphovascular invasion, resection margin status, and surgical resection type. Patients downstaged by chemotherapy, compared with patients with no response, experienced lower rates of local recurrence (6% v. 13%, respectively; P = .030) and systemic recurrence (19% v. 29%, respectively; P = .027) and improved Mandard tumor regression scores (P = .001). Survival was strongly dictated by stage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, rather than clinical stage at presentation.
The stage of esophageal or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy determines prognosis rather than the clinical stage before neoadjuvant chemotherapy, indicating the importance of focusing on postchemotherapy staging to more accurately predict outcome and eligibility for surgery. Patients who are downstaged by neoadjuvant chemotherapy benefit from reduced rates of local and systemic recurrence.
新辅助化疗已被确立用于大多数可切除的食管和食管胃交界腺癌的治疗。然而,评估化疗的降期效果并预测治疗反应仍然具有挑战性,且化疗前后肿瘤分期的相对重要性仍存在争议。
我们分析了 2000 年至 2010 年在伦敦的两个大容量癌症中心连续进行的食管或食管胃交界腺癌切除术。经过标准检查和多学科团队共识,所有患者在治疗前均被分配了临床肿瘤分期,然后与手术切除后的病理分期进行比较。采用 Kaplan-Meier 分析和 Cox 回归分析进行生存分析。
在纳入的 584 例患者中,有 400 例(68%)接受了新辅助化疗。与无反应的患者相比,接受新辅助化疗后肿瘤降期的患者的生存得到改善(P<.001),并且在调整患者年龄、肿瘤分级、临床肿瘤分期、脉管侵犯、切缘状态和手术切除类型后,这种降期(风险比,0.43;95%CI,0.31 至 0.59)是生存的最强独立预测因素。与无反应的患者相比,接受化疗降期的患者局部复发率(分别为 6%和 13%,P=.030)和全身复发率(分别为 19%和 29%,P=.027)较低,且 Mandard 肿瘤消退评分较高(P=.001)。生存受新辅助化疗后分期的强烈影响,而非新辅助化疗前的临床分期。
新辅助化疗后食管或食管胃交界腺癌的分期决定了预后,而非新辅助化疗前的临床分期,这表明关注化疗后分期对于更准确地预测结局和手术适应证至关重要。接受新辅助化疗降期的患者获益于局部和全身复发率的降低。