Ciancaleoni Gianluca, Scafuri Nicola, Bistoni Giovanni, Macchioni Alceo, Tarantelli Francesco, Zuccaccia Daniele, Belpassi Leonardo
Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie Molecolari del CNR (CNR-ISTM), c/o Dipartimento di Chimica, Biologia e Biotecnologie, Università degli Studi di Perugia , I-06123, Perugia, Italy.
Inorg Chem. 2014 Sep 15;53(18):9907-16. doi: 10.1021/ic501574e. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
In this study we have examined 42 (L)M(CO)n complexes (M = Ni and Au), including neutral ligands, such as phosphines and carbenes, and anionic ones. For each complex, the carbonyl stretching frequency (ν(CO)) and the amount of charge donated from the ligand to the metal (CT) have been computed on the basis of DFT calculations. For nickel complexes, the two observables nicely correlate with each other, as expected from the theory underlying the Tolman electronic parameter. On the contrary, for gold complexes a more complex pattern can be observed, with an apparent differentiation between phosphine ligands and carbon-based ones. Such differences have been explained analyzing the Au-L bond in terms of Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson bonding constituents (σ donation and π back-donation). Our analysis demonstrates that in linear gold(I) complexes, ν(CO) depends only on the metal-to-ligand π back-donation.
在本研究中,我们考察了42种(L)M(CO)n配合物(M = Ni和Au),包括中性配体,如膦和卡宾,以及阴离子配体。对于每种配合物,基于密度泛函理论(DFT)计算确定了羰基伸缩频率(ν(CO))以及从配体向金属转移的电荷量(CT)。对于镍配合物,正如托尔曼电子参数理论所预期的那样,这两个可观测量彼此之间具有良好的相关性。相反,对于金配合物,可以观察到更复杂的模式,膦配体和碳基配体之间存在明显差异。通过用杜瓦-查特-邓坎森键合成分(σ给予和π反馈)分析Au-L键,解释了这些差异。我们的分析表明,在直线型金(I)配合物中,ν(CO)仅取决于金属到配体的π反馈。