Suppr超能文献

当托尔曼电子参数不适用时:[(L)Ni(CO)₃](0/-) 和 [(L)Au(CO)](0/+) 的密度泛函理论(DFT)与电荷位移对比研究

When the Tolman electronic parameter fails: a comparative DFT and charge displacement study of [(L)Ni(CO)₃](0/-) and [(L)Au(CO)](0/+).

作者信息

Ciancaleoni Gianluca, Scafuri Nicola, Bistoni Giovanni, Macchioni Alceo, Tarantelli Francesco, Zuccaccia Daniele, Belpassi Leonardo

机构信息

Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie Molecolari del CNR (CNR-ISTM), c/o Dipartimento di Chimica, Biologia e Biotecnologie, Università degli Studi di Perugia , I-06123, Perugia, Italy.

出版信息

Inorg Chem. 2014 Sep 15;53(18):9907-16. doi: 10.1021/ic501574e. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

Abstract

In this study we have examined 42 (L)M(CO)n complexes (M = Ni and Au), including neutral ligands, such as phosphines and carbenes, and anionic ones. For each complex, the carbonyl stretching frequency (ν(CO)) and the amount of charge donated from the ligand to the metal (CT) have been computed on the basis of DFT calculations. For nickel complexes, the two observables nicely correlate with each other, as expected from the theory underlying the Tolman electronic parameter. On the contrary, for gold complexes a more complex pattern can be observed, with an apparent differentiation between phosphine ligands and carbon-based ones. Such differences have been explained analyzing the Au-L bond in terms of Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson bonding constituents (σ donation and π back-donation). Our analysis demonstrates that in linear gold(I) complexes, ν(CO) depends only on the metal-to-ligand π back-donation.

摘要

在本研究中,我们考察了42种(L)M(CO)n配合物(M = Ni和Au),包括中性配体,如膦和卡宾,以及阴离子配体。对于每种配合物,基于密度泛函理论(DFT)计算确定了羰基伸缩频率(ν(CO))以及从配体向金属转移的电荷量(CT)。对于镍配合物,正如托尔曼电子参数理论所预期的那样,这两个可观测量彼此之间具有良好的相关性。相反,对于金配合物,可以观察到更复杂的模式,膦配体和碳基配体之间存在明显差异。通过用杜瓦-查特-邓坎森键合成分(σ给予和π反馈)分析Au-L键,解释了这些差异。我们的分析表明,在直线型金(I)配合物中,ν(CO)仅取决于金属到配体的π反馈。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验