Friedrich S, Zeymer U, Dechend R, Hagedorn I, Riemer T, Zemmrich C, Bramlage P, Pittrow D, Senges J, Schmieder R E
Nephrologie und Hypertensiologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
1] Institut für Herzinfarktforschung Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany [2] Medizinische Klinik B, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
J Hum Hypertens. 2015 May;29(5):316-23. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2014.86. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
We aimed to analyze benefits and risks of aliskiren treatment in older adults (⩾ 65 years) in clinical practice. Patients (n = 14,986) were assigned to either aliskiren (ALIS), an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEi/ARB), or an agent not blocking the renin-angiotensin system (non-RAS). Older adults (n = 7396) had a longer history of hypertension (8.7 vs 4.7 years; P < 0.0001), lower mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP; 87.7 ± 11.0 vs 92.1 ± 11.0 mm Hg) and more renal (12.0 vs 5.6%; P < 0.0001) or cardiovascular disease (44.0 vs 18.9%; P < 0.0001); 4548 received aliskiren (68.8%), 1215 ACEi/ARBs (18.4%) and 850 non-RAS treatments (12.9%). Office BP at 1 year was reduced by 18.4 ± 21.5/7.2 ± 12.0 mm Hg. BP reductions were greater (19.5 ± 21.7/7.6 ± 12.1 mm Hg) in the aliskiren group than in the ACEi/ARB (15.6 ± 20.9/6.4 ± 11.9) and non-RAS groups (16.1 ± 20.7/6.5 ± 11.7 mm Hg), respectively (P<0.0001 for systolic BP (SBP) and <0.01 for DBP). After multivariable adjustment, differences in SBP reductions were clinically irrelevant and no differences were noted for DBP. Adverse effects were higher in older adults with no differences between treatment groups. In conclusion, the present analysis of a large, unselected cohort of patients in clinical practice from the 3A study, offers real-life evidence of the effectiveness and safety of aliskiren for the treatment of hypertension in older adults.
我们旨在分析在临床实践中阿利吉仑治疗老年患者(≥65岁)的获益与风险。将患者(n = 14986)分为阿利吉仑(ALIS)组、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ACEi/ARB)组,以及不阻断肾素 - 血管紧张素系统的药物(非RAS)组。老年患者(n = 7396)有更长的高血压病史(8.7年对4.7年;P < 0.0001),平均舒张压(DBP)更低(87.7±11.0对92.1±11.0 mmHg),肾脏疾病(12.0%对5.6%;P < 0.0001)或心血管疾病(44.0%对18.9%;P < 0.0001)更多;4548例接受阿利吉仑治疗(68.8%),1215例接受ACEi/ARB治疗(18.4%),850例接受非RAS治疗(12.9%)。1年时诊室血压降低了18.4±21.5/7.2±12.0 mmHg。阿利吉仑组的血压降低幅度更大(19.5±21.7/7.6±12.1 mmHg),分别高于ACEi/ARB组(15.6±20.9/6.4±11.9 mmHg)和非RAS组(16.1±20.7/6.5±11.7 mmHg)(收缩压(SBP)P<0.0001,舒张压P<0.01)。多变量调整后,SBP降低幅度的差异在临床上无意义,DBP未发现差异。老年患者的不良反应更高,各治疗组之间无差异。总之,本分析基于3A研究中临床实践中一个未经过筛选的大型患者队列,提供了阿利吉仑治疗老年高血压患者有效性和安全性的真实证据。