Esposito Pasquale, Dal Canton Antonio
Pasquale Esposito, Antonio Dal Canton, Unit of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
World J Nephrol. 2014 Nov 6;3(4):249-55. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v3.i4.249.
Evaluation and improvement of quality of care provided to the patients are of crucial importance in the daily clinical practice and in the health policy planning and financing. Different tools have been developed, including incident analysis, health technology assessment and clinical audit. The clinical audit consist of measuring a clinical outcome or a process, against well-defined standards set on the principles of evidence-based medicine in order to identify the changes needed to improve the quality of care. In particular, patients suffering from chronic renal diseases, present many problems that have been set as topics for clinical audit projects, such as hypertension, anaemia and mineral metabolism management. Although the results of these studies have been encouraging, demonstrating the effectiveness of audit, overall the present evidence is not clearly in favour of clinical audit. These findings call attention to the need to further studies to validate this methodology in different operating scenarios. This review examines the principle of clinical audit, focusing on experiences performed in nephrology settings.
在日常临床实践以及卫生政策规划与筹资中,评估和改善提供给患者的医疗质量至关重要。已经开发了不同的工具,包括事件分析、卫生技术评估和临床审计。临床审计包括根据基于循证医学原则设定的明确标准来衡量临床结果或过程,以便确定提高医疗质量所需的改进措施。特别是,患有慢性肾病的患者存在许多已被设定为临床审计项目主题的问题,如高血压、贫血和矿物质代谢管理。尽管这些研究的结果令人鼓舞,证明了审计的有效性,但总体而言,目前的证据并不明确支持临床审计。这些发现提醒人们需要进一步研究,以在不同的操作场景中验证这种方法。本综述探讨了临床审计的原则,重点关注在肾脏病领域开展的经验。