Brach Jennifer S, Lowry Kristin, Perera Subashan, Hornyak Victoria, Wert David, Studenski Stephanie A, VanSwearingen Jessie M
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Department of Physical Therapy, Des Moines University, Des Moines, IA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Mar;96(3):388-94. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.018. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
To test the proposed mechanism of action of a task-specific motor learning intervention by examining its effect on measures of the motor control of gait.
Single-blinded randomized clinical trial.
University research laboratory.
Adults (N=40) aged ≥65 years with gait speed >1.0m/s and impaired motor skill (figure-of-8 walk time >8s).
The 2 interventions included a task-oriented motor learning and a standard exercise program; both interventions included strength training. Both lasted 12 weeks, with twice-weekly, 1-hour, physical therapist-supervised sessions.
Two measures of the motor control of gait, gait variability and smoothness of walking, were assessed pre- and postintervention by assessors masked to the treatment arm.
Of 40 randomized subjects, 38 completed the trial (mean age ± SD, 77.1±6.0y). The motor learning group improved more than the standard group in double-support time variability (.13m/s vs .05m/s; adjusted difference [AD]=.006, P=.03). Smoothness of walking in the anteroposterior direction improved more in the motor learning than standard group for all conditions (usual: AD=.53, P=.05; narrow: AD=.56, P=.01; dual task: AD=.57, P=.04). Smoothness of walking in the vertical direction also improved more in the motor learning than standard group for the narrow-path (AD=.71, P=.01) and dual-task (AD=.89, P=.01) conditions.
Among older adults with subclinical walking difficulty, there is initial evidence that task-oriented motor learning exercise results in gains in the motor control of walking, while standard exercise does not. Task-oriented motor learning exercise is a promising intervention for improving timing and coordination deficits related to mobility difficulties in older adults, and needs to be evaluated in a definitive larger trial.
通过研究特定任务的运动学习干预对步态运动控制指标的影响,来验证其提出的作用机制。
单盲随机临床试验。
大学研究实验室。
年龄≥65岁、步态速度>1.0m/s且运动技能受损(8字步行时间>8秒)的成年人(N=40)。
两种干预措施包括以任务为导向的运动学习和标准锻炼计划;两种干预措施均包括力量训练。两者均持续12周,每周两次,每次1小时,由物理治疗师监督。
由对治疗组不知情的评估人员在干预前后评估步态运动控制的两项指标,即步态变异性和步行平稳性。
40名随机分组的受试者中,38名完成了试验(平均年龄±标准差,77.1±6.0岁)。运动学习组在双支撑时间变异性方面的改善比标准组更大(0.13m/s对0.05m/s;调整差异[AD]=0.006,P=0.03)。在所有条件下,运动学习组在前后方向的步行平稳性改善均比标准组更大(正常:AD=0.53,P=0.05;狭窄:AD=0.56,P=0.01;双重任务:AD=0.57,P=0.04)。在狭窄路径(AD=0.71,P=0.01)和双重任务(AD=0.89,P=0.01)条件下,运动学习组在垂直方向的步行平稳性改善也比标准组更大。
在有亚临床步行困难的老年人中,初步证据表明以任务为导向的运动学习锻炼能改善步行的运动控制,而标准锻炼则不能。以任务为导向的运动学习锻炼是一种有前景的干预措施,可改善与老年人行动困难相关的时间和协调缺陷,需要在更大规模的确证性试验中进行评估。