Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK.
Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK.
Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):612-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.054. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
The prevalence of urolithiasis is increasing. Lower-pole stones (LPS) are the most common renal calculi and the most likely to require treatment. A systematic review comparing shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in the treatment of ≤20 mm LPS in adults was performed. Comprehensive searches revealed 2741 records; 7 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) recruiting 691 patients were included. Meta-analyses for stone-free rate (SFR) at ≤3 mo favoured PNL over SWL (risk ratio [RR]: 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50-2.77) and RIRS over SWL (RR: 1.31; 95% CI, 1.08-1.59). Stone size subgroup analyses revealed PNL and RIRS were considerably more effective than SWL for >10 mm stones, but the magnitude of benefit was markedly less for ≤10 mm stones. The quality of evidence (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation [GRADE]) for SFR was moderate for these comparisons. The median SFR from reported RCTs suggests PNL is more effective than RIRS. The findings regarding other outcomes were inconclusive because of limited and inconsistent data. Well-designed, prospective, comparative studies that measure these outcomes using standardised definitions are required, particularly for the direct comparison of PNL and RIRS. This systematic review, which used Cochrane methodology and GRADE quality-of-evidence assessment, provides the first level 1a evidence for the management of LPS.
We thoroughly examined the literature to compare the benefits and harms of the different ways of treating kidney stones located at the lower pole. PNL and RIRS were superior to SWL in clearing the stones within 3 mo, but we were unable to make any conclusions regarding other outcomes. More data is required from reliable studies before firm recommendations can be made.
尿石症的患病率正在上升。下极结石(LPS)是最常见的肾结石,也是最有可能需要治疗的结石。我们对比较冲击波碎石术(SWL)、逆行肾内手术(RIRS)和经皮肾镜取石术(PNL)治疗成人≤20mm LPS 的疗效的系统评价进行了综述。全面检索共发现 2741 条记录;纳入了 7 项随机对照试验(RCT),共招募了 691 名患者。荟萃分析显示,3 个月时的结石清除率(SFR)在 PNL 优于 SWL(风险比[RR]:2.04;95%置信区间[CI]:1.50-2.77)和 RIRS 优于 SWL(RR:1.31;95%CI:1.08-1.59)。结石大小亚组分析显示,PNL 和 RIRS 对>10mm 的结石比 SWL 更有效,但对≤10mm 的结石,获益幅度明显较小。这些比较的 SFR 证据质量(推荐评估、制定与评估[GRADE])为中等。从报告的 RCT 中得出的 SFR 中位数表明,PNL 比 RIRS 更有效。由于数据有限且不一致,其他结局的结论不确定。需要设计良好的前瞻性、比较性研究,使用标准化定义来衡量这些结局,特别是对于 PNL 和 RIRS 的直接比较。本系统评价使用 Cochrane 方法和 GRADE 证据质量评估,为 LPS 的治疗提供了首个 1a 级证据。
我们彻底查阅了文献,比较了治疗下极肾结石的不同方法的益处和危害。PNL 和 RIRS 在 3 个月内清除结石的效果优于 SWL,但我们无法就其他结局得出任何结论。在能够提出明确建议之前,需要来自可靠研究的更多数据。