Geiss Otmar, Bianchi Ivana, Barahona Francisco, Barrero-Moreno Josefa
European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, VA, Italy.
European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, VA, Italy.
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2015 Jan;218(1):169-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
Electronic cigarettes have achieved growing popularity since their introduction onto the European market. They are promoted by manufacturers as healthier alternatives to tobacco cigarettes, however debate among scientists and public health experts about their possible impact on health and indoor air quality means further research into the product is required to ensure decisions of policymakers, health care providers and consumers are based on sound science. This study investigated and characterised the impact of 'vaping' (using electronic cigarettes) on indoor environments under controlled conditions using a 30m(3) emission chamber. The study determined the composition of e-cigarette mainstream vapour in terms of propylene glycol, glycerol, carbonyls and nicotine emissions using a smoking machine with adapted smoking parameters. Two different base recipes for refill liquids, with three different amounts of nicotine each, were tested using two models of e-cigarettes. Refill liquids were analysed on their content of propylene glycol, glycerol, nicotine and qualitatively on their principal flavourings. Possible health effects of e-cigarette use are not discussed in this work. Electronic cigarettes tested in this study proved to be sources for propylene glycol, glycerol, nicotine, carbonyls and aerosol particulates. The extent of exposure differs significantly for active and passive 'vapers' (users of electronic cigarettes). Extrapolating from the average amounts of propylene glycol and glycerol condensed on the smoking machine filter pad to the resulting lung-concentration, estimated lung concentrations of 160 and 220mgm(-3) for propylene glycol and glycerol were obtained, respectively. Vaping refill liquids with nicotine concentrations of 9mgmL(-1) led to vapour condensate nicotine amounts comparable to those of low-nicotine regular cigarettes (0.15-0.2mg). In chamber studies, peak concentrations of 2200μgm(-3) for propylene glycol, 136μgm(-3) for glycerol and 0.6μgm(-3) for nicotine were reached. Carbonyls were not detected above the detection limits in chamber studies. Particles in the size range of 20nm to 300nm constantly increased during vaping activity and reached final peak concentrations of 7×10(6)particlesL(-1). Moreover, the tested products showed design flaws such as leakages from the cartridge reservoirs. Possible long term effects of e-cigarettes on health are not yet known. E-cigarettes, the impact of vaping on health and the composition of refill liquids require therefore further research into the product characteristics. The consumers would benefit from harmonised quality and safety improvements of e-cigarettes and refill liquids.
自电子烟进入欧洲市场以来,其受欢迎程度不断提高。制造商将其宣传为比传统香烟更健康的替代品,然而,科学家和公共卫生专家之间关于电子烟对健康和室内空气质量可能产生的影响的争论意味着,需要对该产品进行进一步研究,以确保政策制定者、医疗保健提供者和消费者的决策基于可靠的科学依据。本研究使用一个30立方米的排放舱,在受控条件下调查并描述了“吸电子烟”(使用电子烟)对室内环境的影响。该研究使用一台调整了吸烟参数的吸烟机,确定了电子烟主流烟雾中丙二醇、甘油、羰基化合物和尼古丁排放物的成分。使用两种型号的电子烟,测试了两种不同的烟弹补充液基础配方,每种配方含有三种不同含量的尼古丁。分析了烟弹补充液中丙二醇、甘油、尼古丁的含量,并对其主要调味剂进行了定性分析。本研究未讨论使用电子烟可能对健康产生的影响。在本研究中测试的电子烟被证明是丙二醇、甘油、尼古丁、羰基化合物和气溶胶颗粒的来源。主动和被动“吸电子烟者”(电子烟使用者)的接触程度有显著差异。根据吸烟机滤嘴上冷凝的丙二醇和甘油的平均量推断出肺部的浓度,估计丙二醇和甘油在肺部的浓度分别为160毫克/立方米和220毫克/立方米。使用尼古丁浓度为9毫克/毫升的烟弹补充液产生的烟雾冷凝物中的尼古丁含量与低尼古丁普通香烟(0.15 - 0.2毫克)相当。在舱室研究中,丙二醇的峰值浓度达到2200微克/立方米,甘油为136微克/立方米,尼古丁为0.6微克/立方米。在舱室研究中,羰基化合物未检测到超过检测限的情况。在吸电子烟活动期间,粒径范围在20纳米至300纳米的颗粒持续增加,最终峰值浓度达到7×10⁶个/升。此外,测试的产品存在设计缺陷,如烟弹储存器泄漏。电子烟对健康可能产生的长期影响尚不清楚。因此,电子烟、吸电子烟对健康的影响以及烟弹补充液的成分需要对产品特性进行进一步研究。消费者将受益于电子烟和烟弹补充液质量和安全性的统一改进。