University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA.
Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):959-64. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.049. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
Using a selective α-blocker for medical expulsive therapy (MET) is a cost-effective treatment approach widely used for ureteral stones.
To evaluate the efficacy of silodosin, a selective α-1a receptor antagonist, in this setting.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a multicenter, phase 2 study conducted in adult patients with a unilateral ureteral calculus of 4-10mm. Of 239 patients in the safety population, six discontinued due to adverse events.
Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive silodosin 8 mg or placebo for up to 4 wk.
The primary outcome was spontaneous stone passage, analyzed using logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included time to stone passage, emergency room (ER) visits, hospital admissions, analgesic use, and incidence and severity of pain.
No significant differences between the silodosin and placebo groups were observed for passage rate of all stones (52% vs 44%, respectively; p=0.2). However, silodosin achieved a significantly greater rate of distal ureter stone passage than placebo (p=0.01). Significant differences were not observed for ER visits, hospital admission, or use of analgesics. The number of patients in the intent-to-treat population was slightly below the calculated sample size (232 vs 240) and sample sizes were not calculated for subgroup analyses.
This is among the first prospective, randomized, multi-institutional trials to examine the efficacy of a selective α-1a antagonist as MET in patients with ureteral calculi and did not demonstrate a benefit to the entire ureter. However, silodosin was found to be well tolerated and beneficial in facilitating the passage of distal ureteral stones, warranting additional future studies on distal stone elimination.
In this report, we looked at the efficacy of silodosin for the treatment of ureteral stones. We found that silodosin increased passage of distal ureteral stones.
使用选择性 α 阻断剂进行医学排石疗法(MET)是一种广泛用于输尿管结石的具有成本效益的治疗方法。
评估选择性 α-1a 受体拮抗剂西洛多辛在这种情况下的疗效。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项多中心、2 期研究,纳入了 239 名单侧输尿管结石 4-10mm 的成年患者。在安全性人群中,有 6 名患者因不良事件而退出。
患者随机接受西洛多辛 8mg 或安慰剂治疗,为期 4 周。
主要结局是自发结石排出,采用逻辑回归进行分析。次要结局包括结石排出时间、急诊就诊、住院、镇痛药使用以及疼痛的发生率和严重程度。
西洛多辛组和安慰剂组的所有结石排出率无显著差异(分别为 52%和 44%,p=0.2)。然而,西洛多辛组远端输尿管结石排出率显著高于安慰剂组(p=0.01)。两组在急诊就诊、住院或镇痛药使用方面无显著差异。意向治疗人群的患者数量略低于计算的样本量(232 与 240),且未为亚组分析计算样本量。
这是首次前瞻性、随机、多机构试验,旨在检查选择性 α-1a 拮抗剂作为 MET 在输尿管结石患者中的疗效,并未显示对整个输尿管有益。然而,西洛多辛被发现具有良好的耐受性,并有助于促进远端输尿管结石的排出,值得进一步研究。
在本报告中,我们研究了西洛多辛治疗输尿管结石的疗效。我们发现西洛多辛增加了远端输尿管结石的排出率。