Morgan Kirsty, Lee Jessica, Sebar Bernadette
Population and Social Health Research Program, School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Population and Social Health Research Program, School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Apr;26(4):380-7. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
Although people who inject drugs (PWIDs) have increased healthcare needs, their poor access and utilisation of mainstream primary healthcare services is well documented. To address this situation, community health workers (CHWs) who have personal experience of drug injecting in addition to healthcare training or qualifications are sometimes utilised. However, the role peer workers play as members of clinical primary healthcare teams in Australia and how they manage the healthcare needs of PWID, has been poorly documented.
A qualitative ethnomethodological approach was used to study the methods used by CHWs. Data was collected using participant observation of CHWs in a PWID-targeted primary healthcare centre. CHW healthcare consultations with PWID were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts along with field notes were analysed using membership categorisation and conversation analysis techniques to reveal how CHWs' personal and professional experience shapes their healthcare interactions with PWID clients.
CHWs' personal experience of injecting drug use is an asset they utilise along with their knowledge of clinical practice and service systems. It provides them with specialised knowledge and language--resources that they draw upon to build trust with clients and accomplish transparent, non-judgmental interactions that enable PWID clients to be active participants in the management of their healthcare. Existing literature often discusses these principles at a theoretical level. This study demonstrates how CHWs achieve them at a micro-level through the use of indexical language and displays of the membership categories 'PWID' and 'healthcare worker'.
This research explicates how CHWs serve as an interface between PWID clients and conventional healthcare providers. CHWs deployment of IDU-specific language, membership knowledge, values and behaviours, enable them to interact in ways that foster transparent communication and client participation in healthcare consultations. The incorporation of community health workers into clinical healthcare teams working with IDU populations is a possible means for overcoming barriers to healthcare, such as mistrust and fear of stigma and discrimination, because CHWs are able to serve as an interface between PWID and other healthcare providers.
尽管注射毒品者(PWIDs)的医疗保健需求不断增加,但他们难以获得和利用主流初级医疗保健服务,这一点已有充分记录。为解决这一情况,有时会利用除医疗培训或资质外还具有注射毒品亲身经历的社区卫生工作者(CHWs)。然而,同伴工作者在澳大利亚临床初级医疗保健团队中所扮演的角色以及他们如何满足注射毒品者的医疗保健需求,相关记录却很少。
采用定性民族方法学方法研究社区卫生工作者所使用的方法。通过在以注射毒品者为目标的初级医疗保健中心对社区卫生工作者进行参与观察来收集数据。社区卫生工作者与注射毒品者的医疗咨询进行了录音并逐字转录。使用成员分类和对话分析技术对转录文本以及现场笔记进行分析,以揭示社区卫生工作者的个人和专业经验如何塑造他们与注射毒品者客户的医疗互动。
社区卫生工作者注射毒品的个人经历是他们与临床实践和服务系统知识一起利用的一项资产。这为他们提供了专业知识和语言——他们用以与客户建立信任并实现透明、无偏见互动的资源,从而使注射毒品者客户能够积极参与自身医疗保健管理。现有文献常常在理论层面讨论这些原则。本研究展示了社区卫生工作者如何通过使用索引性语言以及展示“注射毒品者”和“医疗工作者”的成员类别在微观层面实现这些原则。
本研究阐明了社区卫生工作者如何作为注射毒品者客户与传统医疗保健提供者之间的接口。社区卫生工作者对特定于注射吸毒者的语言、成员知识、价值观和行为的运用,使他们能够以促进透明沟通和客户参与医疗咨询的方式进行互动。将社区卫生工作者纳入针对注射吸毒者群体的临床医疗保健团队是克服医疗保健障碍(如不信任以及对污名和歧视的恐惧)的一种可能手段,因为社区卫生工作者能够充当注射毒品者与其他医疗保健提供者之间的接口。