Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Swim Across America Laboratory, Immunology Program, Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, New York, NY 10065, USA; Ludwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College Cornell University, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Melanoma and Immunotherapeutics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College Cornell University, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Jun;150:23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
Immune recognition and elimination of malignant cells require a series of steps orchestrated by the innate and the adaptive arms of the immune system. The majority of tumors have evolved mechanisms that allow for successful evasion of these immune responses. Recognition of these evasive processes led to the development of immunotherapeutic antibodies targeting the co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory receptors on T cells, with the goal of enhancement of T cell activation or reversal of tumor-induced T cell inhibition. Several of these agents, such as antibodies targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) have already demonstrated significant promise in clinical trials. Clinical benefit of these antibodies as single agents, however, has been limited to a subset of patients and has not been observed in all tumor types. These limitations call for the development of rational combination strategies aiming to extend therapeutic benefit to a broader range of patients. These include: 1) modalities that enhance antigen presentation, such as radiation, cryotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted agents, vaccines, toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists, type I interferon, and oncolytic viruses; 2) additional agents aiming to reverse T cell dysfunction, such as other immune checkpoint inhibitors; and 3) agents targeting other immune inhibitory mechanisms, such as inhibitors of indoleamine dioxygenase (IDO), regulatory T cells, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). It is becoming increasingly evident that the efficacy of specific combinations will likely not be universal and that the choice of a treatment modality may need to be tailored to fit the needs of each individual patient.
恶性细胞的免疫识别和消除需要一系列由先天免疫和适应性免疫系统协调的步骤。大多数肿瘤已经进化出了允许成功逃避这些免疫反应的机制。对这些逃避过程的认识导致了针对 T 细胞共刺激和共抑制受体的免疫治疗抗体的发展,其目的是增强 T 细胞的激活或逆转肿瘤诱导的 T 细胞抑制。这些药物中的一些,如靶向细胞毒性 T 淋巴细胞抗原 4(CTLA-4)和程序性死亡受体 1(PD-1)的抗体,已经在临床试验中显示出了显著的前景。然而,这些抗体作为单一药物的临床获益仅限于一部分患者,并且在所有肿瘤类型中都没有观察到。这些限制要求制定合理的联合策略,旨在将治疗效益扩展到更广泛的患者群体。这些策略包括:1)增强抗原呈递的方式,如放射治疗、冷冻疗法、化疗、靶向药物、疫苗、Toll 样受体(TLR)激动剂、I 型干扰素和溶瘤病毒;2)旨在逆转 T 细胞功能障碍的其他药物,如其他免疫检查点抑制剂;3)靶向其他免疫抑制机制的药物,如吲哚胺 2,3-双加氧酶(IDO)抑制剂、调节性 T 细胞和髓源抑制细胞(MDSC)。越来越明显的是,特定组合的疗效可能不是普遍的,并且治疗方式的选择可能需要根据每个患者的具体需求进行调整。