Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 20;162(2):123-32. doi: 10.7326/M14-1651.
The magnitude, consistency, and manner of association between sedentary time and outcomes independent of physical activity remain unclear.
To quantify the association between sedentary time and hospitalizations, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cancer in adults independent of physical activity.
English-language studies in MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Knowledge, and Google Scholar databases were searched through August 2014 with hand-searching of in-text citations and no publication date limitations.
Studies assessing sedentary behavior in adults, adjusted for physical activity and correlated to at least 1 outcome.
Two independent reviewers performed data abstraction and quality assessment, and a third reviewer resolved inconsistencies.
Forty-seven articles met our eligibility criteria. Meta-analyses were performed on outcomes for cardiovascular disease and diabetes (14 studies), cancer (14 studies), and all-cause mortality (13 studies). Prospective cohort designs were used in all but 3 studies; sedentary times were quantified using self-report in all but 1 study. Significant hazard ratio (HR) associations were found with all-cause mortality (HR, 1.240 [95% CI, 1.090 to 1.410]), cardiovascular disease mortality (HR, 1.179 [CI, 1.106 to 1.257]), cardiovascular disease incidence (HR, 1.143 [CI, 1.002 to 1.729]), cancer mortality (HR, 1.173 [CI, 1.108 to 1.242]), cancer incidence (HR, 1.130 [CI, 1.053 to 1.213]), and type 2 diabetes incidence (HR, 1.910 [CI, 1.642 to 2.222]). Hazard ratios associated with sedentary time and outcomes were generally more pronounced at lower levels of physical activity than at higher levels.
There was marked heterogeneity in research designs and the assessment of sedentary time and physical activity.
Prolonged sedentary time was independently associated with deleterious health outcomes regardless of physical activity.
None.
久坐时间与独立于体力活动的结果之间的关联的幅度、一致性和方式仍不清楚。
定量评估久坐时间与成年人住院、全因死亡率、心血管疾病、糖尿病和癌症之间的关联,而不考虑体力活动。
2014 年 8 月前通过 MEDLINE、PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL、 Cochrane Library、Web of Knowledge 和 Google Scholar 数据库以英文检索,并辅以手检文内参考文献,未设定出版日期限制。
评估成年人久坐行为的研究,调整了体力活动,并与至少 1 项结果相关。
两名独立的综述作者进行了数据提取和质量评估,第三位作者解决了意见不一致的问题。
符合入选标准的文章有 47 篇。对心血管疾病和糖尿病(14 项研究)、癌症(14 项研究)和全因死亡率(13 项研究)的结局进行了荟萃分析。除 3 项研究外,所有研究均采用前瞻性队列设计;除 1 项研究外,所有研究均采用自我报告量化久坐时间。与全因死亡率(HR,1.240[95%CI,1.090 至 1.410])、心血管疾病死亡率(HR,1.179[CI,1.106 至 1.257])、心血管疾病发病率(HR,1.143[CI,1.002 至 1.729])、癌症死亡率(HR,1.173[CI,1.108 至 1.242])、癌症发病率(HR,1.130[CI,1.053 至 1.213])和 2 型糖尿病发病率(HR,1.910[CI,1.642 至 2.222])显著相关。与久坐时间和结局相关的 HR 通常在体力活动水平较低时比在较高时更为明显。
研究设计和久坐时间及体力活动的评估存在明显的异质性。
久坐时间延长与不良健康结局独立相关,而与体力活动无关。
无。