Suppr超能文献

采用BAP1免疫组化和p16荧光原位杂交技术区分良性与恶性间皮增生。

BAP1 immunohistochemistry and p16 FISH to separate benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations.

作者信息

Sheffield Brandon S, Hwang Harry C, Lee Anna F, Thompson Kim, Rodriguez Stephanie, Tse Christopher H, Gown Allen M, Churg Andrew

机构信息

*Division of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital ‡Division of Anatomical Pathology, Children's and Women's Hospital of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada †PhenoPath Laboratories, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 Jul;39(7):977-82. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000394.

Abstract

A variety of immunohistochemical (IHC) stains have been proposed to mark either benign or malignant mesothelial proliferations. Loss of the p16 tumor suppressor (CDKN2A), through homozygous deletions of 9p21, is a good marker of mesotheliomas but lacks sensitivity. Recent reports indicate that some mesotheliomas are associated with loss of BRCA-associated protein 1 (BAP1) expression. Here we investigate BAP1 and p16 as potential markers of malignancy and compare test characteristics with previously proposed markers using a well-characterized tissue microarray. BAP1 protein expression was interrogated by IHC. The p16 locus was examined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) directed toward chromosome 9p21. Loss of BAP1 was identified in 7/26 mesotheliomas and 0/49 benign proliferations. Loss of p16 was identified in 14/27 mesotheliomas and 0/40 benign proliferations, yielding 100% specificity and positive predictive value for each marker. Together, BAP1 IHC and p16 FISH were 58% sensitive for detecting malignancy. Various combinations of p53, EMA, IMP3, and GLUT1 showed reasonably high specificity (96% to 98%) but poor to extremely poor sensitivity. Combined BAP1 IHC/p16 FISH testing is a highly specific method of diagnosing malignant mesotheliomas when the question is whether a mesothelial proliferation is benign or malignant and is particularly useful when tissue invasion by mesothelial cells cannot be demonstrated. However, combined BAP1/p16 FISH testing is not highly sensitive, and negative results do not rule out a mesothelioma. The test characteristics of previously proposed markers EMA, p53, GLUT1, IMP3 suggest that, even in combination, these markers are not useful tools in this clinical setting.

摘要

已经提出了多种免疫组织化学(IHC)染色方法来标记良性或恶性间皮增生。通过9p21的纯合缺失导致的p16肿瘤抑制因子(CDKN2A)缺失是间皮瘤的一个良好标志物,但缺乏敏感性。最近的报告表明,一些间皮瘤与BRCA相关蛋白1(BAP1)表达缺失有关。在此,我们研究BAP1和p16作为恶性肿瘤的潜在标志物,并使用特征明确的组织微阵列将检测特征与先前提出的标志物进行比较。通过IHC检测BAP1蛋白表达。通过针对9号染色体p21的荧光原位杂交(FISH)检测p16基因座。在26例间皮瘤中有7例检测到BAP1缺失,49例良性增生中未检测到缺失。在27例间皮瘤中有14例检测到p16缺失,40例良性增生中未检测到缺失,每种标志物的特异性和阳性预测值均为100%。BAP1 IHC和p16 FISH联合检测对恶性肿瘤检测的敏感性为58%。p53、EMA、IMP3和GLUT1的各种组合显示出相当高的特异性(96%至98%),但敏感性较差至极差。当问题是间皮增生是良性还是恶性时,联合BAP1 IHC/p16 FISH检测是诊断恶性间皮瘤的一种高度特异性方法,当无法证明间皮细胞的组织浸润时尤其有用。然而,联合BAP1/p16 FISH检测的敏感性不高,阴性结果不能排除间皮瘤。先前提出的标志物EMA、p53、GLUT1、IMP3的检测特征表明,即使联合使用,这些标志物在这种临床情况下也不是有用的工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验