Kolte A M, Olsen L R, Mikkelsen E M, Christiansen O B, Nielsen H S
Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Unit, Fertility Clinic 4071, University Hospital Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Child and Adolescent Mental Health Center, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hum Reprod. 2015 Apr;30(4):777-82. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev014. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
Is the prevalence of psychological stress and moderate/severe depression higher for women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) than pregnancy planners trying to conceive naturally?
Both psychological stress and major depression are significantly more common among women with RPL than in those trying to conceive naturally.
RPL has a significant emotional impact on couples, especially the woman. Previous studies have shown inconclusive results.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: In this cross-sectional study, we compared the prevalence of stress and depression among 301 women with RPL and 1813 women attempting to conceive naturally. We defined RPL as three or more pregnancy losses before 12 weeks' gestation. RPL patients were enrolled from 2010 to 2013 and the comparison group from 2011 to 2014.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: RPL patients completed an online questionnaire before their first consultation at the Danish RPL Unit. In addition, we included data from a comparison group of 1813 women who participated in the Soon Parents Study (www.SnartForældre.dk). The Major Depression Index (MDI) was used to assess symptoms of depression, and Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) was used to measure stress. Relevant demographic data were also retrieved.
Of the RPL patients, 26 (8.6%) had a score on the MDI corresponding to moderate/severe depression, as did 40 (2.2%) of the women in Soon Parents Study (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 5.53 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.09; 14.61)). A high stress level, defined as ≥19 on the PSS scale, was reported by 124 (41.2%) of the patients and 420 (23.2%) in the comparison group (adjusted OR 1.59 (95% CI 1.03; 2.44)).
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: We used online questionnaires, and have no interview data. We were unaware if any of the women in the comparison group suffer from RPL.
This study should entail a heightened awareness of mental distress among care providers for women with RPL.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No specific funding was sought for this study. The Soon Parents Study is funded by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD060680-01A4). No authors have competing interests to declare.
N/A.
复发性流产(RPL)女性的心理压力和中度/重度抑郁患病率是否高于自然受孕的备孕女性?
RPL女性的心理压力和重度抑郁均显著高于自然受孕的女性。
RPL对夫妻尤其是女性有重大情感影响。既往研究结果尚无定论。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:在这项横断面研究中,我们比较了301例RPL女性和1813例自然受孕女性的压力和抑郁患病率。我们将RPL定义为妊娠12周前发生三次或更多次流产。RPL患者于2010年至2013年入组,对照组于2011年至2014年入组。
参与者/材料、环境、方法:RPL患者在丹麦RPL诊疗中心首次咨询前完成一份在线问卷。此外,我们纳入了来自1813例参与“准父母研究”(www.SnartForældre.dk)女性的对照组数据。使用重度抑郁指数(MDI)评估抑郁症状,使用科恩感知压力量表(PSS)测量压力。还收集了相关人口统计学数据。
RPL患者中,26例(8.6%)MDI评分对应中度/重度抑郁,“准父母研究”中的女性有40例(2.2%)如此(调整优势比(OR)5.53(95%置信区间(CI):2.09;14.61))。PSS量表评分≥19定义为高压力水平,患者中有124例(41.2%)报告有高压力水平,对照组中有420例(23.2%)(调整OR 1.59(95%CI 1.03;2.44))。
局限性、谨慎理由:我们使用了在线问卷,没有访谈数据。我们不知道对照组中的女性是否患有RPL。
本研究应使护理人员提高对RPL女性心理困扰的认识。
研究资金/利益冲突:本研究未寻求特定资金。“准父母研究”由美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所资助(R01 HD060680 - 01A4)。作者均无利益冲突声明。
无。