Suppr超能文献

使用容积钳夹法进行连续无创动脉压测量:对重症监护病房患者的CNAP设备的评估

Continuous noninvasive arterial pressure measurement using the volume clamp method: an evaluation of the CNAP device in intensive care unit patients.

作者信息

Wagner Julia Y, Negulescu Ileana, Schöfthaler Miriam, Hapfelmeier Alexander, Meidert Agnes S, Huber Wolfgang, Schmid Roland M, Saugel Bernd

机构信息

III. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.

Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Monit Comput. 2015 Dec;29(6):807-13. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9670-2. Epub 2015 Mar 1.

Abstract

The CNAP system allows continuous noninvasive arterial pressure measurement based on the volume clamp method using a finger cuff. We aimed to evaluate the agreement between arterial pressure measurements noninvasively obtained using the CNAP device and arterial catheter-derived arterial pressure measurements in intensive care unit patients. In 55 intensive care unit patients, we simultaneously recorded arterial pressure values obtained by an arterial catheter placed in the abdominal aorta through the femoral artery (criterion standard) and arterial pressure values determined noninvasively using CNAP. We performed Bland-Altman analysis and calculated the percentage error. The mean difference (±standard deviation, 95% limits of agreement, percentage error) between noninvasive (CNAP) and invasively assessed arterial pressure was for mean arterial pressure +1 mmHg (±9 mmHg, -16 to +19 mmHg, 22%), for systolic arterial pressure -10 mmHg (±16 mmHg, -42 to +21 mmHg, 27%), and for diastolic arterial pressure +7 mmHg (±9 mmHg, -10 to +24 mmHg, 28%). Our results indicate a reasonable accuracy and precision for the determination of mean and diastolic arterial pressure by noninvasive continuous arterial pressure measurements using the volume clamp method compared with the criterion standard (invasive arterial catheter). Systolic arterial pressure is determined less accurately and precisely.

摘要

CNAP系统允许基于容积钳夹法使用手指袖带进行连续无创动脉压测量。我们旨在评估使用CNAP设备无创获得的动脉压测量值与重症监护病房患者经动脉导管获得的动脉压测量值之间的一致性。在55例重症监护病房患者中,我们同时记录了通过经股动脉置于腹主动脉的动脉导管获得的动脉压值(标准对照)以及使用CNAP无创测定的动脉压值。我们进行了Bland-Altman分析并计算了百分比误差。无创(CNAP)和有创评估的动脉压之间的平均差异(±标准差、95%一致性界限、百分比误差),对于平均动脉压为+1 mmHg(±9 mmHg,-16至+19 mmHg,22%),对于收缩压为-10 mmHg(±16 mmHg,-42至+21 mmHg,27%),对于舒张压为+7 mmHg(±9 mmHg,-10至+24 mmHg,28%)。我们的结果表明,与标准对照(有创动脉导管)相比,使用容积钳夹法进行无创连续动脉压测量来测定平均动脉压和舒张压具有合理的准确性和精密度。收缩压的测定准确性和精密度较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验