Sałat Kinga, Filipek Barbara
Department of Pharmacodynamics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University, Medyczna 9, 30-688 Cracow, Poland.
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2015 Mar;16(3):167-78. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1400189.
The aim of this research was to assess the antinociceptive activity of the transient receptor potential (TRP) channel TRPV1, TRPM8, and TRPA1 antagonists in neurogenic, tonic, and neuropathic pain models in mice. For this purpose, TRP channel antagonists were administered into the dorsal surface of a hind paw 15 min before capsaicin, allyl isothiocyanate (AITC), or formalin. Their antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic efficacies after intraperitoneal administration were also assessed in a paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain model. Motor coordination of paclitaxel-treated mice that received these TRP channel antagonists was investigated using the rotarod test. TRPV1 antagonists, capsazepine and SB-366791, attenuated capsaicin-induced nociceptive reaction in a concentration-dependent manner. At 8 µg/20 µl, this effect was 51% (P<0.001) for capsazepine and 37% (P<0.05) for SB-366791. A TRPA1 antagonist, A-967079, reduced pain reaction by 48% (P<0.05) in the AITC test and by 54% (P<0.001) in the early phase of the formalin test. The test compounds had no influence on the late phase of the formalin test. In paclitaxel-treated mice, they did not attenuate heat hyperalgesia but N-(3-aminopropyl)-2-{[(3-methylphenyl)methyl]oxy}-N-(2-thienylmethyl) benzamide hydrochloride salt (AMTB), a TRPM8 antagonist, reduced cold hyperalgesia and tactile allodynia by 31% (P<0.05) and 51% (P<0.01), respectively. HC-030031, a TRPA1 channel antagonist, attenuated tactile allodynia in the von Frey test (62%; P<0.001). In conclusion, distinct members of TRP channel family are involved in different pain models in mice. Antagonists of TRP channels attenuate nocifensive responses of neurogenic, tonic, and neuropathic pain, but their efficacies strongly depend on the pain model used.
本研究旨在评估瞬时受体电位(TRP)通道TRPV1、TRPM8和TRPA1拮抗剂在小鼠神经源性、紧张性和神经性疼痛模型中的抗伤害感受活性。为此,在给予辣椒素、异硫氰酸烯丙酯(AITC)或福尔马林前15分钟,将TRP通道拮抗剂注射到后爪的背表面。还在紫杉醇诱导的神经性疼痛模型中评估了腹腔注射后它们的抗痛觉过敏和抗痛觉超敏功效。使用转棒试验研究了接受这些TRP通道拮抗剂的紫杉醇处理小鼠的运动协调性。TRPV1拮抗剂辣椒平(capsazepine)和SB - 366791以浓度依赖性方式减弱辣椒素诱导的伤害性反应。在8 μg/20 μl时,辣椒平的这种作用为51%(P<0.001),SB - 366791为37%(P<0.05)。TRPA1拮抗剂A - 967079在AITC试验中使疼痛反应降低48%(P<0.05),在福尔马林试验早期使疼痛反应降低54%(P<0.001)。受试化合物对福尔马林试验的后期阶段没有影响。在紫杉醇处理的小鼠中,它们没有减轻热痛觉过敏,但TRPM8拮抗剂盐酸N -(3 - 氨丙基)- 2 - {[(3 - 甲基苯基)甲基]氧基}- N -(2 - 噻吩基甲基)苯甲酰胺(AMTB)分别使冷痛觉过敏和触觉异常性疼痛降低31%(P<0.05)和51%(P<0.01)。TRPA1通道拮抗剂HC - 030031在von Frey试验中减弱了触觉异常性疼痛(62%;P<0.001)。总之,TRP通道家族的不同成员参与了小鼠不同的疼痛模型。TRP通道拮抗剂减弱神经源性、紧张性和神经性疼痛的伤害性反应,但其功效强烈依赖于所使用的疼痛模型。