Didari Tina, Mozaffari Shilan, Nikfar Shekoufeh, Abdollahi Mohammad
Tina Didari, Shilan Mozaffari, Mohammad Abdollahi, Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran.
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar 14;21(10):3072-84. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i10.3072.
To investigate the efficacy of probiotics in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients.
PubMed, Cochrane library, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Clinicaltrial.gov databases were searched for literature published between September 2007 and December 2013. The applied Mesh terms were "probiotics," "irritable bowel syndrome," and "irritable bowel syndrome treatment." The collected data contained24 clinical trials, of which 15 were eligible for meta-analysis and nine were reviewed systematically. All studies were randomized placebo-controlled trials in patients with IBS that investigated the efficacy of probiotics in IBS improvement. The Jadad score was used to assess the methodological quality of trials. The quality scale ranges from 0 to 5 points, with a score ≤ 2 indicating a low quality report, and a score of ≥ 3 indicating a high quality report. Relative risk (RR), standardized effect size, and 95%CI were calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird method. The Cochran Q test was used to test heterogeneity with P < 0.05. Funnel plots were constructed and Egger's and Begg-Mazumdar tests were performed to assess publication bias.
A total of 1793 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The RR of responders to therapies based on abdominal pain score in IBS patients for two included trials comparing probiotics to placebo was 1.96 (95%CI: 1.14-3.36; P = 0.01). RR of responders to therapies based on a global symptom score in IBS patients for two included trials comparing probiotics with placebo was 2.43 (95%CI: 1.13-5.21; P = 0.02). For adequate improvement of general symptoms in IBS patients, the RR of seven included trials (six studies) comparing probiotics with placebo was 2.14 (95%CI: 1.08-4.26; P = 0.03). Distension, bloating, and flatulence were evaluated using an IBS severity scoring system in three trials (two studies) to compare the effect of probiotic therapy in IBS patients with placebo, the standardized effect size of mean differences for probiotics therapy was -2.57 (95%CI: -13.05--7.92).
Probiotics reduce pain and symptom severity scores. The results demonstrate the beneficial effects of probiotics in IBS patients in comparison with placebo.
探讨益生菌对肠易激综合征(IBS)患者的疗效。
检索PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Scopus、谷歌学术和Clinicaltrial.gov数据库中2007年9月至2013年12月发表的文献。应用的医学主题词为“益生菌”“肠易激综合征”和“肠易激综合征治疗”。收集到24项临床试验,其中15项符合荟萃分析条件,9项进行了系统评价。所有研究均为IBS患者的随机安慰剂对照试验,旨在研究益生菌改善IBS的疗效。采用Jadad评分评估试验的方法学质量。质量量表范围为0至5分,评分≤2表明报告质量低,评分≥3表明报告质量高。使用DerSimonian-Laird方法计算相对风险(RR)、标准化效应量和95%置信区间(CI)。采用Cochran Q检验检测异质性,P<0.05。构建漏斗图并进行Egger检验和Begg-Mazumdar检验以评估发表偏倚。
荟萃分析共纳入1793例患者。两项纳入试验比较益生菌与安慰剂,基于IBS患者腹痛评分的治疗反应者RR为1.96(95%CI:1.14 - 3.36;P = 0.01)。两项纳入试验比较益生菌与安慰剂,基于IBS患者总体症状评分的治疗反应者RR为2.43(95%CI:1.13 - 5.21;P = 0.02)。对于IBS患者总体症状的充分改善,七项纳入试验(六项研究)比较益生菌与安慰剂的RR为2.14(95%CI:1.08 - 4.26;P = 0.03)。在三项试验(两项研究)中使用IBS严重程度评分系统评估腹胀、腹部膨胀和肠胃气胀,以比较益生菌疗法对IBS患者与安慰剂的效果,益生菌疗法平均差异的标准化效应量为 - 2.57(95%CI: - 13.05 - - 7.92)。
益生菌可降低疼痛和症状严重程度评分。结果表明与安慰剂相比,益生菌对IBS患者有有益作用。