Suppr超能文献

益生菌在肠易激综合征中的有效性:更新的系统评价与荟萃分析

Effectiveness of probiotics in irritable bowel syndrome: Updated systematic review with meta-analysis.

作者信息

Didari Tina, Mozaffari Shilan, Nikfar Shekoufeh, Abdollahi Mohammad

机构信息

Tina Didari, Shilan Mozaffari, Mohammad Abdollahi, Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar 14;21(10):3072-84. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i10.3072.

Abstract

AIM

To investigate the efficacy of probiotics in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane library, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Clinicaltrial.gov databases were searched for literature published between September 2007 and December 2013. The applied Mesh terms were "probiotics," "irritable bowel syndrome," and "irritable bowel syndrome treatment." The collected data contained24 clinical trials, of which 15 were eligible for meta-analysis and nine were reviewed systematically. All studies were randomized placebo-controlled trials in patients with IBS that investigated the efficacy of probiotics in IBS improvement. The Jadad score was used to assess the methodological quality of trials. The quality scale ranges from 0 to 5 points, with a score ≤ 2 indicating a low quality report, and a score of ≥ 3 indicating a high quality report. Relative risk (RR), standardized effect size, and 95%CI were calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird method. The Cochran Q test was used to test heterogeneity with P < 0.05. Funnel plots were constructed and Egger's and Begg-Mazumdar tests were performed to assess publication bias.

RESULTS

A total of 1793 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The RR of responders to therapies based on abdominal pain score in IBS patients for two included trials comparing probiotics to placebo was 1.96 (95%CI: 1.14-3.36; P = 0.01). RR of responders to therapies based on a global symptom score in IBS patients for two included trials comparing probiotics with placebo was 2.43 (95%CI: 1.13-5.21; P = 0.02). For adequate improvement of general symptoms in IBS patients, the RR of seven included trials (six studies) comparing probiotics with placebo was 2.14 (95%CI: 1.08-4.26; P = 0.03). Distension, bloating, and flatulence were evaluated using an IBS severity scoring system in three trials (two studies) to compare the effect of probiotic therapy in IBS patients with placebo, the standardized effect size of mean differences for probiotics therapy was -2.57 (95%CI: -13.05--7.92).

CONCLUSION

Probiotics reduce pain and symptom severity scores. The results demonstrate the beneficial effects of probiotics in IBS patients in comparison with placebo.

摘要

目的

探讨益生菌对肠易激综合征(IBS)患者的疗效。

方法

检索PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Scopus、谷歌学术和Clinicaltrial.gov数据库中2007年9月至2013年12月发表的文献。应用的医学主题词为“益生菌”“肠易激综合征”和“肠易激综合征治疗”。收集到24项临床试验,其中15项符合荟萃分析条件,9项进行了系统评价。所有研究均为IBS患者的随机安慰剂对照试验,旨在研究益生菌改善IBS的疗效。采用Jadad评分评估试验的方法学质量。质量量表范围为0至5分,评分≤2表明报告质量低,评分≥3表明报告质量高。使用DerSimonian-Laird方法计算相对风险(RR)、标准化效应量和95%置信区间(CI)。采用Cochran Q检验检测异质性,P<0.05。构建漏斗图并进行Egger检验和Begg-Mazumdar检验以评估发表偏倚。

结果

荟萃分析共纳入1793例患者。两项纳入试验比较益生菌与安慰剂,基于IBS患者腹痛评分的治疗反应者RR为1.96(95%CI:1.14 - 3.36;P = 0.01)。两项纳入试验比较益生菌与安慰剂,基于IBS患者总体症状评分的治疗反应者RR为2.43(95%CI:1.13 - 5.21;P = 0.02)。对于IBS患者总体症状的充分改善,七项纳入试验(六项研究)比较益生菌与安慰剂的RR为2.14(95%CI:1.08 - 4.26;P = 0.03)。在三项试验(两项研究)中使用IBS严重程度评分系统评估腹胀、腹部膨胀和肠胃气胀,以比较益生菌疗法对IBS患者与安慰剂的效果,益生菌疗法平均差异的标准化效应量为 - 2.57(95%CI: - 13.05 - - 7.92)。

结论

益生菌可降低疼痛和症状严重程度评分。结果表明与安慰剂相比,益生菌对IBS患者有有益作用。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of probiotics in irritable bowel syndrome: Updated systematic review with meta-analysis.
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar 14;21(10):3072-84. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i10.3072.
2
Bulking agents, antispasmodics and antidepressants for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Aug 10;2011(8):CD003460. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003460.pub3.
3
Physical activity for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 29;6(6):CD011497. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011497.pub2.
4
Dietary interventions for recurrent abdominal pain in childhood.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 23;3(3):CD010972. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010972.pub2.
5
Probiotics for management of functional abdominal pain disorders in children.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 17;2(2):CD012849. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012849.pub2.
6
Acupuncture for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD005111. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005111.pub3.
7
Efficacy of Bifidobacterium infantis 35624 in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-analysis.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Jul;33(7):1191-1197. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1292230. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
8
Acupuncture for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD005111. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005111.pub2.
9
Efficacy of Probiotics for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Apr 1;12:859967. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.859967. eCollection 2022.
10
Bulking agents, antispasmodic and antidepressant medication for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18(2):CD003460. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003460.pub2.

引用本文的文献

2
Probiotic bacteria vs. yeast for gastrointestinal diseases treatment: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 24;20(6):e0324926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324926. eCollection 2025.
3
Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis and Its Role in the Development of Irritable Bowel Syndrome.
Cureus. 2025 Apr 27;17(4):e83084. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83084. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
Association between trimethylamine N-oxide and prognosis of patients with myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 10;11:1334730. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1334730. eCollection 2024.
8
Vaginal and rectal microbiome contribute to genital inflammation in chronic pelvic pain.
BMC Med. 2024 Jul 8;22(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03500-1.

本文引用的文献

1
The safety of novel drugs used to treat irritable bowel syndrome.
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014 May;13(5):625-38. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2014.902932. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
3
Regulation of Intestinal Immune Responses through TLR Activation: Implications for Pro- and Prebiotics.
Front Immunol. 2014 Feb 18;5:60. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00060. eCollection 2014.
4
A systematic review of the safety of probiotics.
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014 Feb;13(2):227-39. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2014.872627. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
5
Irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease and the microbiome.
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2014 Feb;21(1):15-21. doi: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000032.
6
Probiotics for childhood functional gastrointestinal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Acta Paediatr. 2014 Apr;103(4):365-72. doi: 10.1111/apa.12513. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
7
Probiotics and irritable bowel syndrome.
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep 28;19(36):5973-80. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i36.5973.
8
Intestinal microbiota and immune function in the pathogenesis of irritable bowel syndrome.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2013 Oct 15;305(8):G529-41. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00207.2012. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
9
Current and future pharmacological treatments for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2013 Jun;14(9):1151-60. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2013.794223. Epub 2013 Apr 27.
10
Effect of probiotic species on irritable bowel syndrome symptoms: A bring up to date meta-analysis.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2013 Jan;105(1):19-36. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082013000100005.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验