Silva M, Pham N, Lewis C, Iyer S, Kwok E, Solomon G, Zeise L
Department of Pesticide Regulation, California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA), Sacramento, California.
CalEPA's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), Sacramento, California.
Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2015 Apr;104(2):71-89. doi: 10.1002/bdrb.21140. Epub 2015 May 27.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Toxicity Forecaster (ToxCast) is a potential tool for chemical prioritization, hazard identification, and risk assessment. We conducted a case study to compare ToxCast data with endpoints from other in vitro and in vivo studies for two data-rich pesticides: endosulfan and methidathion.
ToxCast assays for endocrine disruption, development (zebrafish), and neurotoxicity were qualitatively compared to traditional neurotoxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity findings. We also used in vitro-in vivo extrapolation to convert half-maximal activity concentrations in active ToxCast assays to rat oral equivalent doses, and quantitatively compared these to the lowest observable effect level (LOEL) from in vivo studies.
Endosulfan was inactive for GABAA R, unlike in vivo; but active with dopamine transporter assays and was neurotoxic in zebrafish as expected. Methidathion was not active for these endpoints in vivo or in vitro. Acetylcholinesterase inhibition was ToxCast-inactive, although both pesticides are inhibitors in vivo. ToxCast results were generally inactive for endosulfan estrogen receptor agonism and androgen receptor antagonism unlike in vivo. Calculated oral equivalent doses for estrogen receptor and androgen receptor pathways and for zebrafish assays for both compounds were generally consistent with in vivo LOELs. Endosulfan showed neurotoxicity and both pesticides showed developmental effects in the zebrafish assays, although methidathion is not developmentally toxic in vivo.
ToxCast's predictions showed concordance on some endpoints and nonconcordance, consisting mainly of false inactives, in several critical endpoints, likely due to a lack of metabolic activation and limitations in assay design. Zebrafish assays were good predictors of developmental toxicity and neurotoxicity for endosulfan.
美国环境保护局(EPA)的毒性预测器(ToxCast)是一种用于化学物质优先级排序、危害识别和风险评估的潜在工具。我们进行了一项案例研究,以比较ToxCast数据与其他体外和体内研究中针对两种数据丰富的农药(硫丹和杀扑磷)的终点指标。
将ToxCast内分泌干扰、发育(斑马鱼)和神经毒性检测与传统神经毒性、发育和生殖毒性研究结果进行定性比较。我们还使用体外-体内外推法将活性ToxCast检测中的半数最大活性浓度转换为大鼠口服等效剂量,并将这些剂量与体内研究中的最低可观察到效应水平(LOEL)进行定量比较。
硫丹在体内对GABAA R无活性,但在多巴胺转运体检测中呈活性,且如预期在斑马鱼中具有神经毒性。杀扑磷在体内或体外对这些终点指标均无活性。乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制在ToxCast检测中无活性,尽管这两种农药在体内均为抑制剂。与体内情况不同,ToxCast结果在硫丹雌激素受体激动和雄激素受体拮抗方面通常无活性。两种化合物的雌激素受体和雄激素受体途径以及斑马鱼检测的计算口服等效剂量通常与体内LOEL一致。硫丹在斑马鱼检测中显示出神经毒性,两种农药在斑马鱼检测中均显示出发育影响,尽管杀扑磷在体内无发育毒性。
ToxCast的预测在一些终点指标上显示出一致性,而在几个关键终点指标上存在不一致,主要表现为假阴性,这可能是由于缺乏代谢活化和检测设计的局限性。斑马鱼检测是硫丹发育毒性和神经毒性的良好预测指标。