Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Gut. 2015 Aug;64(8):1327-37. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308074. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
Although colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common cause of cancer-related death, it is fortunately amenable to screening with faecal tests for occult blood and endoscopic tests. Despite the evidence for the efficacy of guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests (gFOBT), they have not been popular with primary care providers in many jurisdictions, in part because of poor sensitivity for advanced colorectal neoplasms (advanced adenomas and CRC). In order to address this issue, high sensitivity gFOBT have been recommended, however, these tests are limited by a reduction in specificity compared with the traditional gFOBT. Where colonoscopy is available, some providers have opted to recommend screening colonoscopy to their patients instead of faecal testing, as they believe it to be a better test. Newer methods for detecting occult human blood in faeces have been developed. These tests, called faecal immunochemical tests (FIT), are immunoassays specific for human haemoglobin. FIT hold considerable promise over the traditional guaiac methods including improved analytical and clinical sensitivity for CRC, better detection of advanced adenomas, and greater screenee participation. In addition, the quantitative FIT are more flexible than gFOBT as a numerical result is reported, allowing customisation of the positivity threshold. When compared with endoscopy, FIT are less sensitive for the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasms when only one time testing is applied to a screening population; however, this is offset by improved participation in a programme of annual or biennial screens and a better safety profile. This review will describe how gFOBT and FIT work and will present the evidence that supports the use of FIT over gFOBT, including the cost-effectiveness of FIT relative to gFOBT. Finally, specific issues related to FIT implementation will be discussed, particularly with respect to organised CRC screening programmes.
虽然结直肠癌(CRC)是癌症相关死亡的常见原因,但幸运的是,它可以通过粪便潜血检测和内镜检查进行筛查。尽管基于愈创木脂的粪便潜血检测(gFOBT)的疗效有证据,但在许多司法管辖区,初级保健提供者并不喜欢它们,部分原因是它们对高级结直肠肿瘤(高级腺瘤和 CRC)的敏感性较差。为了解决这个问题,已经推荐了高灵敏度的 gFOBT,但这些测试的特异性与传统的 gFOBT 相比有所降低。在有结肠镜检查的情况下,一些提供者选择向患者推荐筛查结肠镜检查,而不是粪便检测,因为他们认为这是一种更好的检查方法。已经开发出了用于检测粪便中隐匿性人血的新方法。这些测试称为粪便免疫化学测试(FIT),是针对人血红蛋白的免疫测定。FIT 相对于传统的愈创木脂方法具有很大的优势,包括提高了对 CRC 的分析和临床敏感性,更好地检测高级腺瘤,以及提高了受检者的参与度。此外,定量 FIT 比 gFOBT 更灵活,因为它报告了一个数值结果,可以定制阳性阈值。与内镜检查相比,当仅对筛查人群进行一次检测时,FIT 对高级结直肠肿瘤的检测敏感性较低;然而,这被通过每年或每两年进行一次筛查的计划提高的参与度和更好的安全性所抵消。这篇综述将描述 gFOBT 和 FIT 的工作原理,并介绍支持 FIT 优于 gFOBT 的证据,包括 FIT 相对于 gFOBT 的成本效益。最后,将讨论与 FIT 实施相关的具体问题,特别是在有组织的 CRC 筛查计划方面。