Dumville Jo C, Owens Gemma L, Crosbie Emma J, Peinemann Frank, Liu Zhenmi
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, M13 9PL.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 4;2015(6):CD011278. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011278.pub2.
Following surgery, incisions are usually closed by fixing the edges together with sutures (stitches), staples, adhesive glue or clips. This process helps the cut edges heal together and is called 'healing by primary intention'. However, not all incised wounds are closed in this way: where there is high risk of infection, or when there has been significant tissue loss, wounds may be left open to heal from the 'bottom up'. This delayed healing is known as 'healing by secondary intention'. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is one treatment option for surgical wounds that are healing by secondary intention.
To assess the effects of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) on the healing of surgical wounds healing by secondary intention (SWHSI) in any care setting.
For this review, in May 2015 we searched the following databases: the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register; The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations; Ovid EMBASE; and EBSCO CINAHL. There were no restrictions based on language or date of publication.
Published or unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of NPWT with alternative treatments or different types of NPWT in the treatment of SWHSI. We excluded open abdominal wounds from this review as they are the subject of a separate Cochrane review that is in draft.
Two review authors independently performed study selection, risk of bias assessment and data extraction.
We located two studies (69 participants) for inclusion in this review. One study compared NPWT with an alginate dressing in the treatment of open, infected groin wounds. and one study compared NPWT with a silicone dressing in the treatment of excised pilonidal sinus. The trials reported limited outcome data on healing, adverse events and resource use.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is currently no rigorous RCT evidence available regarding the clinical effectiveness of NPWT in the treatment of surgical wounds healing by secondary intention as defined in this review. The potential benefits and harms of using this treatment for this wound type remain largely uncertain.
手术后,切口通常通过用缝线(针脚)、吻合钉、胶水或夹子固定边缘来闭合。这个过程有助于切口边缘愈合在一起,被称为“一期愈合”。然而,并非所有切开的伤口都以这种方式闭合:在感染风险高的情况下,或者当组织有大量缺失时,伤口可能会敞开,从“底部向上”愈合。这种延迟愈合被称为“二期愈合”。负压伤口治疗(NPWT)是二期愈合的手术伤口的一种治疗选择。
评估负压伤口治疗(NPWT)在任何护理环境中对二期愈合的手术伤口(SWHSI)愈合的影响。
对于本综述,我们在2015年5月检索了以下数据库:Cochrane伤口小组专业注册库;Cochrane对照试验中央注册库;Ovid MEDLINE;Ovid MEDLINE(在研及其他非索引引文);Ovid EMBASE;以及EBSCO CINAHL。没有基于语言或出版日期的限制。
比较NPWT与替代治疗或不同类型的NPWT在治疗SWHSI中的效果的已发表或未发表的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们将开放性腹部伤口排除在本综述之外,因为它们是一项单独的处于草稿阶段的Cochrane综述的主题。
两位综述作者独立进行研究选择、偏倚风险评估和数据提取。
我们找到了两项研究(69名参与者)纳入本综述。一项研究比较了NPWT与藻酸盐敷料在治疗开放性感染腹股沟伤口中的效果,另一项研究比较了NPWT与硅胶敷料在治疗切除后的藏毛窦中的效果。试验报告了关于愈合、不良事件和资源使用的有限结果数据。
目前没有关于NPWT在治疗本综述所定义的二期愈合的手术伤口方面的临床有效性的严格RCT证据。使用这种治疗方法对这种伤口类型的潜在益处和危害在很大程度上仍然不确定。