Suppr超能文献

一项II/III期随机研究,比较瑞戈非尼联合吉西他滨与单用吉西他滨治疗既往未治疗的转移性胰腺癌患者的疗效和安全性。

A phase II/III randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of rigosertib plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer.

作者信息

O'Neil B H, Scott A J, Ma W W, Cohen S J, Aisner D L, Menter A R, Tejani M A, Cho J K, Granfortuna J, Coveler L, Olowokure O O, Baranda J C, Cusnir M, Phillip P, Boles J, Nazemzadeh R, Rarick M, Cohen D J, Radford J, Fehrenbacher L, Bajaj R, Bathini V, Fanta P, Berlin J, McRee A J, Maguire R, Wilhelm F, Maniar M, Jimeno A, Gomes C L, Messersmith W A

机构信息

Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.

University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26(9):1923-1929. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv264. Epub 2015 Jun 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rigosertib (ON 01910.Na), a first-in-class Ras mimetic and small-molecule inhibitor of multiple signaling pathways including polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), has shown efficacy in preclinical pancreatic cancer models. In this study, rigosertib was assessed in combination with gemcitabine in patients with treatment-naïve metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle plus rigosertib 1800 mg/m(2) via 2-h continuous IV infusions given twice weekly for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle (RIG + GEM) versus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 weeks in a 4-week cycle (GEM).

RESULTS

A total of 160 patients were enrolled globally and randomly assigned to RIG + GEM (106 patients) or GEM (54). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were neutropenia (8% in the RIG + GEM group versus 6% in the GEM group), hyponatremia (17% versus 4%), and anemia (8% versus 4%). The median overall survival was 6.1 months for RIG + GEM versus 6.4 months for GEM [hazard ratio (HR), 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85-1.81]. The median progression-free survival was 3.4 months for both groups (HR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.68-1.36). The partial response rate was 19% versus 13% for RIG + GEM versus GEM, respectively. Of 64 tumor samples sent for molecular analysis, 47 were adequate for multiplex genetic testing and 41 were positive for mutations. The majority of cases had KRAS gene mutations (40 cases). Other mutations detected included TP53 (13 cases) and PIK3CA (1 case). No correlation between mutational status and efficacy was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of RIG + GEM failed to demonstrate an improvement in survival or response compared with GEM in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Rigosertib showed a similar safety profile to that seen in previous trials using the IV formulation.

摘要

背景

瑞戈非尼(ON 01910.Na)是一种一流的Ras模拟物以及包括polo样激酶1(PLK1)和磷酸肌醇3激酶(PI3K)在内的多种信号通路的小分子抑制剂,已在临床前胰腺癌模型中显示出疗效。在本研究中,对初治转移性胰腺腺癌患者评估了瑞戈非尼与吉西他滨联合用药的效果。

材料与方法

转移性胰腺腺癌患者按2:1的比例随机分组,一组接受吉西他滨1000mg/m²,每周一次,共3周,每4周为一个周期,同时瑞戈非尼1800mg/m²,通过2小时持续静脉输注,每周两次,共3周,每4周为一个周期(RIG + GEM);另一组接受吉西他滨1000mg/m²,每周一次,共3周,每4周为一个周期(GEM)。

结果

全球共有160例患者入组并随机分配至RIG + GEM组(106例患者)或GEM组(54例)。最常见的3级或更高等级不良事件为中性粒细胞减少(RIG + GEM组为8%,GEM组为6%)、低钠血症(17%对4%)和贫血(8%对4%)。RIG + GEM组的中位总生存期为6.1个月,GEM组为6.4个月[风险比(HR),1.24;95%置信区间(CI)0.85 - 1.81]。两组的中位无进展生存期均为3.4个月(HR = 0.96;95% CI 0.68 - 1.36)。RIG + GEM组和GEM组的部分缓解率分别为19%和13%。在送去进行分子分析的64份肿瘤样本中,47份适合进行多重基因检测,41份检测到突变呈阳性。大多数病例存在KRAS基因突变(40例)。检测到的其他突变包括TP53(13例)和PIK3CA(1例)。未检测到突变状态与疗效之间的相关性。

结论

在转移性胰腺腺癌患者中,与GEM相比,RIG + GEM联合用药未能显示出生存率或缓解率的改善。瑞戈非尼的安全性与之前使用静脉制剂的试验中观察到的相似。

相似文献

10
Gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (GEMOXEL) compared with gemcitabine alone in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a randomized phase II study.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2015 Apr;75(4):683-90. doi: 10.1007/s00280-015-2683-1. Epub 2015 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
PLK1 inhibitors for the treatment of colorectal cancer.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 May 20;87(7):4165-4172. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003373. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Molecular insights into immune evasion and therapeutic paradigms in pancreatic cancer.
Chin J Cancer Res. 2025 Jun 30;37(3):466-486. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2025.03.13.
3
Unlocking the therapeutic potential of rigosertib as a selective therapy for ovarian cancer.
Cell Rep Med. 2025 Jul 15;6(7):102218. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.102218. Epub 2025 Jul 7.
4
SUMOylation substrate encoding genes as prognostic biomarkers in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with functional assessment of .
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Apr 16;16:1532658. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1532658. eCollection 2025.
5
Chemotherapy and radiotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 5;12(12):CD011044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011044.pub3.
6
Consensus, debate, and prospective on pancreatic cancer treatments.
J Hematol Oncol. 2024 Oct 10;17(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s13045-024-01613-x.
7
Drug screening in human physiologic medium identifies uric acid as an inhibitor of rigosertib efficacy.
JCI Insight. 2024 May 30;9(13):e174329. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.174329.
8
Centrosomes and associated proteins in pathogenesis and treatment of breast cancer.
Front Oncol. 2024 Mar 28;14:1370565. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1370565. eCollection 2024.
9
ESCO2's oncogenic role in human tumors: a pan-cancer analysis and experimental validation.
BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 11;24(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12213-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Rigosertib induces cell death of a myelodysplastic syndrome-derived cell line by DNA damage-induced G2/M arrest.
Cancer Sci. 2015 Mar;106(3):287-93. doi: 10.1111/cas.12605. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
3
Oncogenic KRAS signalling in pancreatic cancer.
Br J Cancer. 2014 Aug 26;111(5):817-22. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.215. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
4
Nab-paclitaxel: potential for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.
Onco Targets Ther. 2014 Feb 4;7:187-92. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S40705. eCollection 2014.
5
Phase I clinical trial of oral rigosertib in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.
Br J Haematol. 2013 Aug;162(4):517-24. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12436. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
7
FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1817-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011923.
8
Subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and their differing responses to therapy.
Nat Med. 2011 Apr;17(4):500-3. doi: 10.1038/nm.2344. Epub 2011 Apr 3.
9
New phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors for cancer.
Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2011 Apr;20(4):507-18. doi: 10.1517/13543784.2011.562192.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验