O'Neil B H, Scott A J, Ma W W, Cohen S J, Aisner D L, Menter A R, Tejani M A, Cho J K, Granfortuna J, Coveler L, Olowokure O O, Baranda J C, Cusnir M, Phillip P, Boles J, Nazemzadeh R, Rarick M, Cohen D J, Radford J, Fehrenbacher L, Bajaj R, Bathini V, Fanta P, Berlin J, McRee A J, Maguire R, Wilhelm F, Maniar M, Jimeno A, Gomes C L, Messersmith W A
Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora.
Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26(9):1923-1929. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv264. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
Rigosertib (ON 01910.Na), a first-in-class Ras mimetic and small-molecule inhibitor of multiple signaling pathways including polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), has shown efficacy in preclinical pancreatic cancer models. In this study, rigosertib was assessed in combination with gemcitabine in patients with treatment-naïve metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle plus rigosertib 1800 mg/m(2) via 2-h continuous IV infusions given twice weekly for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle (RIG + GEM) versus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 weeks in a 4-week cycle (GEM).
A total of 160 patients were enrolled globally and randomly assigned to RIG + GEM (106 patients) or GEM (54). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were neutropenia (8% in the RIG + GEM group versus 6% in the GEM group), hyponatremia (17% versus 4%), and anemia (8% versus 4%). The median overall survival was 6.1 months for RIG + GEM versus 6.4 months for GEM [hazard ratio (HR), 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85-1.81]. The median progression-free survival was 3.4 months for both groups (HR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.68-1.36). The partial response rate was 19% versus 13% for RIG + GEM versus GEM, respectively. Of 64 tumor samples sent for molecular analysis, 47 were adequate for multiplex genetic testing and 41 were positive for mutations. The majority of cases had KRAS gene mutations (40 cases). Other mutations detected included TP53 (13 cases) and PIK3CA (1 case). No correlation between mutational status and efficacy was detected.
The combination of RIG + GEM failed to demonstrate an improvement in survival or response compared with GEM in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Rigosertib showed a similar safety profile to that seen in previous trials using the IV formulation.
瑞戈非尼(ON 01910.Na)是一种一流的Ras模拟物以及包括polo样激酶1(PLK1)和磷酸肌醇3激酶(PI3K)在内的多种信号通路的小分子抑制剂,已在临床前胰腺癌模型中显示出疗效。在本研究中,对初治转移性胰腺腺癌患者评估了瑞戈非尼与吉西他滨联合用药的效果。
转移性胰腺腺癌患者按2:1的比例随机分组,一组接受吉西他滨1000mg/m²,每周一次,共3周,每4周为一个周期,同时瑞戈非尼1800mg/m²,通过2小时持续静脉输注,每周两次,共3周,每4周为一个周期(RIG + GEM);另一组接受吉西他滨1000mg/m²,每周一次,共3周,每4周为一个周期(GEM)。
全球共有160例患者入组并随机分配至RIG + GEM组(106例患者)或GEM组(54例)。最常见的3级或更高等级不良事件为中性粒细胞减少(RIG + GEM组为8%,GEM组为6%)、低钠血症(17%对4%)和贫血(8%对4%)。RIG + GEM组的中位总生存期为6.1个月,GEM组为6.4个月[风险比(HR),1.24;95%置信区间(CI)0.85 - 1.81]。两组的中位无进展生存期均为3.4个月(HR = 0.96;95% CI 0.68 - 1.36)。RIG + GEM组和GEM组的部分缓解率分别为19%和13%。在送去进行分子分析的64份肿瘤样本中,47份适合进行多重基因检测,41份检测到突变呈阳性。大多数病例存在KRAS基因突变(40例)。检测到的其他突变包括TP53(13例)和PIK3CA(1例)。未检测到突变状态与疗效之间的相关性。
在转移性胰腺腺癌患者中,与GEM相比,RIG + GEM联合用药未能显示出生存率或缓解率的改善。瑞戈非尼的安全性与之前使用静脉制剂的试验中观察到的相似。