Amoaku W M K, Saker S, Stewart E A
Academic Ophthalmology, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Eye (Lond). 2015 Sep;29(9):1115-30. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.110. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
Diabetic macular oedema (DMO) is responsible for significant visual impairment in diabetic patients. The primary cause of DMO is fluid leakage resulting from increased vascular permeability through contributory anatomical and biochemical changes. These include endothelial cell (EC) death or dysfunction, pericyte loss or dysfunction, thickened basement membrane, loss or dysfunction of glial cells, and loss/change of EC Glycocalyx. The molecular changes include increased reactive oxygen species, pro-inflammatory changes: advanced glycation end products, intracellular adhesion molecule-1, Complement 5-9 deposition and cytokines, which result in increased paracellular permeability, tight junction disruption, and increased transcellular permeability. Laser photocoagulation has been the mainstay of treatment until recently when pharmacological treatments were introduced. The current treatments for DMO target reducing vascular leak in the macula once it has occurred, they do not attempt to treat the underlying pathology. These pharmacological treatments are aimed at antagonising vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or non-VEGF inflammatory pathways, and include intravitreal injections of anti-VEGFs (ranibizumab, aflibercept or bevacizumab) or steroids (fluocinolone, dexamethasone or triamcinolone) as single therapies. The available evidence suggests that each individual treatment modality in DMO does not result in a completely dry macula in most cases. The ideal treatment for DMO should improve vision and improve morphological changes in the macular (eg, reduce macular oedema) for a significant duration, reduced adverse events, reduced treatment burden and costs, and be well tolerated by patients. This review evaluates the individual treatments available as monotherapies, and discusses the rationale and potential for combination therapy in DMO. A comprehensive review of clinical trials related to DMO and their outcomes was completed. Where phase III randomised control trials were available, these were referenced, if not available, phase II trials have been included.
糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DMO)是导致糖尿病患者视力严重受损的原因。DMO的主要病因是血管通透性增加导致的液体渗漏,这是由相关的解剖学和生化变化引起的。这些变化包括内皮细胞(EC)死亡或功能障碍、周细胞丢失或功能障碍、基底膜增厚、神经胶质细胞丢失或功能障碍以及EC糖萼的丢失/改变。分子变化包括活性氧增加、促炎变化:晚期糖基化终产物、细胞间黏附分子-1、补体5-9沉积和细胞因子,这些导致细胞旁通透性增加、紧密连接破坏和跨细胞通透性增加。直到最近引入药物治疗之前,激光光凝一直是主要的治疗方法。目前治疗DMO的方法是在黄斑出现血管渗漏后,旨在减少黄斑区的血管渗漏,而不是试图治疗潜在的病理状况。这些药物治疗旨在拮抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)或非VEGF炎症途径,包括玻璃体内注射抗VEGF药物(雷珠单抗、阿柏西普或贝伐单抗)或类固醇(氟轻松、地塞米松或曲安奈德)作为单一疗法。现有证据表明,在大多数情况下,DMO的每种单独治疗方式都不能使黄斑完全干涸。DMO的理想治疗方法应在较长时间内改善视力并改善黄斑的形态变化(例如,减轻黄斑水肿),减少不良事件,减轻治疗负担和成本,并且患者耐受性良好。本综述评估了作为单一疗法可用的各种治疗方法,并讨论了DMO联合治疗的基本原理和潜力。完成了对与DMO相关临床试验及其结果的全面综述。如果有III期随机对照试验,则引用这些试验;如果没有,则纳入II期试验。