Suppr超能文献

帕博利珠单抗对比研究者选择的化疗用于伊匹单抗难治性黑色素瘤(KEYNOTE-002):一项随机、对照、2期试验

Pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for ipilimumab-refractory melanoma (KEYNOTE-002): a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial.

作者信息

Ribas Antoni, Puzanov Igor, Dummer Reinhard, Schadendorf Dirk, Hamid Omid, Robert Caroline, Hodi F Stephen, Schachter Jacob, Pavlick Anna C, Lewis Karl D, Cranmer Lee D, Blank Christian U, O'Day Steven J, Ascierto Paolo A, Salama April K S, Margolin Kim A, Loquai Carmen, Eigentler Thomas K, Gangadhar Tara C, Carlino Matteo S, Agarwala Sanjiv S, Moschos Stergios J, Sosman Jeffrey A, Goldinger Simone M, Shapira-Frommer Ronnie, Gonzalez Rene, Kirkwood John M, Wolchok Jedd D, Eggermont Alexander, Li Xiaoyun Nicole, Zhou Wei, Zernhelt Adriane M, Lis Joy, Ebbinghaus Scot, Kang S Peter, Daud Adil

机构信息

University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):908-18. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00083-2. Epub 2015 Jun 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with melanoma that progresses on ipilimumab and, if BRAF(V600) mutant-positive, a BRAF or MEK inhibitor or both, have few treatment options. We assessed the efficacy and safety of two pembrolizumab doses versus investigator-choice chemotherapy in patients with ipilimumab-refractory melanoma.

METHODS

We carried out a randomised phase 2 trial of patients aged 18 years or older from 73 hospitals, clinics, and academic medical centres in 12 countries who had confirmed progressive disease within 24 weeks after two or more ipilimumab doses and, if BRAF(V600) mutant-positive, previous treatment with a BRAF or MEK inhibitor or both. Patients had to have resolution of all ipilimumab-related adverse events to grade 0-1 and prednisone 10 mg/day or less for at least 2 weeks, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and at least one measurable lesion to be eligible. Using a centralised interactive voice response system, we randomly assigned (1:1:1) patients in a block size of six to receive intravenous pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks or investigator-choice chemotherapy (paclitaxel plus carboplatin, paclitaxel, carboplatin, dacarbazine, or oral temozolomide). Randomisation was stratified by ECOG performance status, lactate dehydrogenase concentration, and BRAF(V600) mutation status. Individual treatment assignment between pembrolizumab and chemotherapy was open label, but investigators and patients were masked to assignment of the dose of pembrolizumab. We present the primary endpoint at the prespecified second interim analysis of progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01704287. The study is closed to enrolment but continues to follow up and treat patients.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 30, 2012, and Nov 13, 2013, we enrolled 540 patients: 180 patients were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg, 181 to receive pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg, and 179 to receive chemotherapy. Based on 410 progression-free survival events, progression-free survival was improved in patients assigned to pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg (HR 0·57, 95% CI 0·45-0·73; p<0·0001) and those assigned to pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg (0·50, 0·39-0·64; p<0·0001) compared with those assigned to chemotherapy. 6-month progression-free survival was 34% (95% CI 27-41) in the pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg group, 38% (31-45) in the 10 mg/kg group, and 16% (10-22) in the chemotherapy group. Treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 20 (11%) patients in the pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg group, 25 (14%) in the pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg group, and 45 (26%) in the chemotherapy group. The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse event in the pembrolizumab groups was fatigue (two [1%] of 178 patients in the 2 mg/kg group and one [<1%] of 179 patients in the 10 mg/kg group, compared with eight [5%] of 171 in the chemotherapy group). Other treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events include generalised oedema and myalgia (each in two [1%] patients) in those given pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg; hypopituitarism, colitis, diarrhoea, decreased appetite, hyponatremia, and pneumonitis (each in two [1%]) in those given pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg; and anaemia (nine [5%]), fatigue (eight [5%]), neutropenia (six [4%]), and leucopenia (six [4%]) in those assigned to chemotherapy.

INTERPRETATION

These findings establish pembrolizumab as a new standard of care for the treatment of ipilimumab-refractory melanoma.

FUNDING

Merck Sharp & Dohme.

摘要

背景

接受伊匹单抗治疗后病情进展的黑色素瘤患者,若BRAF(V600)突变呈阳性,则此前接受过BRAF或MEK抑制剂治疗或二者均接受过治疗,这类患者的治疗选择有限。我们评估了两种派姆单抗剂量与研究者选择的化疗方案相比,在伊匹单抗难治性黑色素瘤患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们开展了一项2期随机试验,纳入来自12个国家73家医院、诊所和学术医疗中心的18岁及以上患者,这些患者在接受两剂或更多剂伊匹单抗后24周内病情确诊进展,且若BRAF(V600)突变呈阳性,则此前接受过BRAF或MEK抑制剂治疗或二者均接受过治疗。患者必须使所有伊匹单抗相关不良事件消退至0 - 1级,且泼尼松剂量为10 mg/天或更低至少2周,东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态为0或1,并且至少有一处可测量病灶才有资格入组。我们使用集中式交互式语音应答系统,将患者按1:1:1随机分配,每组6人,接受静脉注射派姆单抗2 mg/kg或10 mg/kg,每3周一次,或研究者选择的化疗方案(紫杉醇加卡铂、紫杉醇、卡铂、达卡巴嗪或口服替莫唑胺)。随机分组按ECOG体能状态、乳酸脱氢酶浓度和BRAF(V600)突变状态进行分层。派姆单抗与化疗之间的个体治疗分配为开放标签,但研究者和患者对派姆单抗剂量的分配不知情。我们在预先设定的意向性治疗人群无进展生存期的第二次中期分析中展示主要终点。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号为NCT01704287。该研究已停止入组,但继续对患者进行随访和治疗。

结果

2012年11月30日至2013年11月13日期间,我们共纳入540例患者:180例患者被随机分配接受派姆单抗2 mg/kg,181例接受派姆单抗10 mg/kg,179例接受化疗。基于410例无进展生存期事件,与接受化疗的患者相比,接受派姆单抗2 mg/kg的患者(HR 0·57,95% CI 0·45 - 0·73;p<0·0001)和接受派姆单抗10 mg/kg的患者(0·50,0·39 - 0·64;p<0·0001)的无进展生存期得到改善。派姆单抗2 mg/kg组6个月无进展生存率为34%(95% CI 27 - 41),10 mg/kg组为38%(31 - 45),化疗组为16%(10 - 22)。派姆单抗2 mg/kg组20例(11%)患者发生3 - 4级治疗相关不良事件,派姆单抗10 mg/kg组25例(14%),化疗组45例(26%)。派姆单抗组最常见的3 - 4级治疗相关不良事件是疲劳(2 mg/kg组178例患者中有2例[1%],10 mg/kg组179例患者中有1例[<1%],化疗组171例患者中有8例[5%])。其他3 - 4级治疗相关不良事件包括接受派姆单抗2 mg/kg治疗的患者出现全身性水肿和肌痛(各2例[1%]);接受派姆单抗10 mg/kg治疗的患者出现垂体功能减退、结肠炎、腹泻、食欲减退、低钠血症和肺炎(各2例[1%]);接受化疗的患者出现贫血(9例[5%])、疲劳(8例[5%])、中性粒细胞减少(6例[4%])和白细胞减少(6例[4%])。

解读

这些发现确立了派姆单抗作为伊匹单抗难治性黑色素瘤治疗的新护理标准。

资助

默克夏普&多贺美公司。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Reporting of immune-related adverse events in US Food and Drug Administration approvals of immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 13;15:1606599. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1606599. eCollection 2025.
3
Immunotherapy in advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer: earlier or later?
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 9;12:1524176. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1524176. eCollection 2025.
7
From pathogen to cure: exploring the antitumor potential of Toxoplasma gondii.
Infect Agent Cancer. 2025 Jun 18;20(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13027-025-00673-z.
8
Recent Advances in Molecular Research and Treatment for Melanoma in Asian Populations.
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jun 3;26(11):5370. doi: 10.3390/ijms26115370.

本文引用的文献

1
Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2521-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503093. Epub 2015 Apr 19.
3
PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance.
Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):568-71. doi: 10.1038/nature13954.
4
Predictive correlates of response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients.
Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):563-7. doi: 10.1038/nature14011.
5
MPDL3280A (anti-PD-L1) treatment leads to clinical activity in metastatic bladder cancer.
Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):558-62. doi: 10.1038/nature13904.
6
Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):320-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1412082. Epub 2014 Nov 16.
7
Anti-CTLA-4 therapy broadens the melanoma-reactive CD8+ T cell response.
Sci Transl Med. 2014 Sep 17;6(254):254ra128. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008918.
8
Distinct immunological mechanisms of CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade revealed by analyzing TCR usage in blood lymphocytes.
Oncoimmunology. 2014 Jun 25;3:e29244. doi: 10.4161/onci.29244. eCollection 2014.
10
Moving beyond the hazard ratio in quantifying the between-group difference in survival analysis.
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Aug 1;32(22):2380-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.2208. Epub 2014 Jun 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验