Fathi Marzieh, Zare Mohammad Amin, Bahmani Hamid Reza, Zehtabchi Shahriar
Emergency Medicine Department, Rasoul Akram Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
Emergency Medicine Department, Rasoul Akram Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;33(9):1205-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.05.021. Epub 2015 May 29.
This randomized clinical trial compares the efficacy and safety of oral oxycodone (an oral opioid) with naproxen (a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug) in acute pain control in patients with soft tissue injury. It also evaluates the need for additional doses of analgesics in the first 24 hours of discharge from emergency department (ED).
Adult (>18 years old) patients with soft tissue injuries were enrolled in a teaching urban ED. Subjects were randomly allocated to receive a single dose of oral oxycodone (5 mg) or oral naproxen (250 mg). Pain scores and drugs' adverse effects were assessed before, 30 minutes, and 60 minutes after medication.
efficacy in pain control (reduction in pain scale >2 points) and safety (rate of side effects). The need for additional pain medication after discharge was assessed by follow-up phone call 24 hours after discharge.
A total of 150 patients were enrolled. Pain scores were similar in oxycodone vs naproxen groups before (6.21 ± 0.9 in vs 6.0 ± 1.0), 30 minutes (4.5 ± 1.4 vs 4.4 ± 1.2), and 60 minutes (2.5 ± 1.3 in vs 2.6 ± 1.3) after medication, respectively. Twelve (16.0%) patients in oral oxycodone group and 5 (6.6%) patients in naproxen group needed more analgesics in first 24 hours after ED discharge. Adverse effects were more common in oxycodone group (statistically significant difference). The most common adverse effects in oxycodone group were nausea, (13.3%); vomiting, (8.0%); dizziness, (5.3%); drowsiness, 3 (4.0%); and pruritis, (2.7%).
Oral oxycodone is as effective as naproxen in soft tissue injury pain control but has a less favorable safety profile.
本随机临床试验比较口服羟考酮(一种口服阿片类药物)与萘普生(一种非甾体抗炎药)在控制软组织损伤患者急性疼痛方面的疗效和安全性。它还评估了从急诊科(ED)出院后的头24小时内额外使用镇痛剂的必要性。
成年(>18岁)软组织损伤患者被纳入一家城市教学急诊科。受试者被随机分配接受单剂量口服羟考酮(5毫克)或口服萘普生(250毫克)。在用药前、用药后30分钟和60分钟评估疼痛评分和药物不良反应。
共纳入150名患者。羟考酮组和萘普生组用药前(分别为6.21±0.9和6.0±1.0)、用药后30分钟(分别为4.5±1.4和4.4±1.2)和60分钟(分别为2.5±1.3和2.6±1.3)的疼痛评分相似。口服羟考酮组有12名(16.0%)患者,萘普生组有5名(6.6%)患者在ED出院后的头24小时内需要更多的镇痛剂。不良反应在羟考酮组更常见(有统计学显著差异)。羟考酮组最常见的不良反应为恶心(13.3%)、呕吐(8.0%)、头晕(5.3%)、嗜睡(4.0%)以及瘙痒(2.7%)。
口服羟考酮在控制软组织损伤疼痛方面与萘普生效果相当,但安全性较差。