Suppr超能文献

骨质疏松症治疗方面的差异。

Disparities in osteoporosis treatments.

作者信息

Liu Z, Weaver J, de Papp A, Li Z, Martin J, Allen K, Hui S, Imel E A

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Health Information and Translational Sciences Building, 410 W 10th Street, Suite 3000, Indianapolis, IN, 46202-5111, USA.

Merck & Co, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, NJ, 08889, USA.

出版信息

Osteoporos Int. 2016 Feb;27(2):509-19. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3249-0. Epub 2015 Jul 28.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Osteoporosis treatment rates within 2 years following an index event (fragility fracture, osteoporotic bone mineral density (BMD) T-score, or osteoporosis ICD-9 codes) were determined from 2005 to 2011. Most patients were not treated. Fracture patients had the lowest treatment rate. Low treatment rates also occurred in patients that were male, black, or had non-commercial insurance.

INTRODUCTION

Clinical recognition of osteoporosis (osteoporotic BMD, assignment of an ICD-9 code, or the occurrence of fragility fractures) provides opportunities to treat patients at risk for future fracture.

METHODS

A cohort of 36,965 patients was identified from 2005 to 2011 in the Indiana Health Information Exchange, with index events after age 50 of either non-traumatic fractures, an osteoporosis ICD-9 code, or a BMD T-score ≤ -2.5. Patients with osteoporosis treatment in the preceding year were excluded. Medication records during the ensuing 2 years were extracted to identify osteoporosis treatments, demographics, comorbidities, and co-medications. Predictors of treatment were evaluated in a multivariable logistic regression model.

RESULTS

The cohort was 78 % female, 11 % black, 91 % urban-dwelling, and 53 % commercially insured. The index events were as follows: osteoporosis diagnosis (47 % of patients), fragility fracture (44 %), and osteoporotic T-scores (9 %). Within 2 years after the index event, 23.3 % received osteoporosis medications (of which, 82.2 % were oral bisphosphonates). Treatment rates were higher after osteoporosis diagnosis codes (29.3 %) or osteoporotic T-score (53.9 %) than after fracture index events (10.5 %) (p < 0.001). Age had an inverted U-shaped effect for women with highest odds around 60-65 years. Women (OR 1.86) and non-black patients (OR 1.52) were more likely to be treated (p < 0.001). Patients with public (versus commercial) insurance (OR 0.86, p < 0.001) or chronic comorbidities (ORs about 0.7-0.9, p < 0.001) were less likely to be treated.

CONCLUSION

Most osteoporosis treatment candidates remained untreated. Men, black patients, and patients with fracture or chronic comorbidities were less likely to receive treatment, representing disparity in the recognition and treatment of osteoporosis.

摘要

未标注

从2005年至2011年确定了在索引事件(脆性骨折、骨质疏松性骨密度(BMD)T评分或骨质疏松症ICD - 9编码)后2年内的骨质疏松症治疗率。大多数患者未接受治疗。骨折患者的治疗率最低。男性、黑人或拥有非商业保险的患者治疗率也较低。

引言

骨质疏松症的临床识别(骨质疏松性BMD、ICD - 9编码的指定或脆性骨折的发生)为治疗未来有骨折风险的患者提供了机会。

方法

2005年至2011年在印第安纳州健康信息交换中心识别出一组36965名患者,索引事件为50岁以后的非创伤性骨折、骨质疏松症ICD - 9编码或BMD T评分≤ - 2.5。排除前一年接受过骨质疏松症治疗的患者。提取随后2年内的用药记录以确定骨质疏松症治疗情况、人口统计学特征、合并症和联合用药情况。在多变量逻辑回归模型中评估治疗的预测因素。

结果

该队列中78%为女性,11%为黑人,91%居住在城市,53%拥有商业保险。索引事件如下:骨质疏松症诊断(47%的患者)、脆性骨折(44%)和骨质疏松性T评分(9%)。在索引事件后2年内,23.3%的患者接受了骨质疏松症药物治疗(其中82.2%为口服双膦酸盐)。骨质疏松症诊断编码(29.3%)或骨质疏松性T评分(53.9%)后的治疗率高于骨折索引事件后的治疗率(10.5%)(p < 0.001)。年龄对女性有倒U形影响,60 - 65岁左右几率最高。女性(优势比1.86)和非黑人患者(优势比1.52)更有可能接受治疗(p < 0.001)。拥有公共(相对于商业)保险的患者(优势比0.86,p < 0.001)或患有慢性合并症的患者(优势比约0.7 - 0.9,p < 0.001)接受治疗的可能性较小。

结论

大多数骨质疏松症治疗候选患者仍未接受治疗。男性、黑人患者以及骨折或患有慢性合并症的患者接受治疗的可能性较小,这代表了骨质疏松症在识别和治疗方面的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验