Ndegwa Eunice N, Bartlett Samantha N, Toro Haroldo, Joiner Kellye S, van Santen Vicky L
a Department of Pathobiology, 264 Greene Hall , College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University , Auburn AL , 36849-5519 , USA.
Avian Pathol. 2015 Oct;44(5):408-20. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2015.1077928.
Polyvalent infectious bronchitis virus vaccination is common worldwide. The possibility of vaccine interference after simultaneous combined vaccination with Arkansas (Ark) and Massachusetts (Mass)-type vaccines was evaluated in an effort to explain the high prevalence of Ark-type infectious bronchitis virus in vaccinated chickens. Chickens ocularly vaccinated with combinations of Ark and Mass showed predominance of Mass vaccine virus before 9 days post-vaccination (DPV) in tears. Even when Mass and Ark vaccines were inoculated into separate eyes, Mass vaccine virus was able to outcompete Ark vaccine virus. Although Mass vaccine virus apparently had a replication advantage over Ark vaccine in ocular tissues, Ark vaccine virus appeared to have an advantage in spreading to and/or replicating in the trachea. When chickens vaccinated with Ark or Mass vaccine were housed together, Mass vaccine virus was able to spread to Ark-vaccinated chickens, but the Ark vaccine was not detected in Mass-vaccinated chickens. Only Mass vaccine was detected in tears of sentinel birds introduced into groups receiving both vaccines. Furthermore, Ark vaccine virus RNA was not detectable until 10 DPV in most tear samples from chickens vaccinated with both Ark and Mass vaccines at varying Ark vaccine doses, while high concentrations of Mass virus RNA were detectable at 3-7 DPV. In contrast, Ark vaccine virus replicated effectively early after vaccination in chickens vaccinated with Ark vaccine alone. The different replication dynamics of Ark and Mass viruses in chickens vaccinated with combined vaccines did not result in reduced protection against Ark challenge at 21 DPV. Further studies are needed to clarify if the viral interference detected determines differences in protection against challenge at other time points after vaccination.
多价传染性支气管炎病毒疫苗接种在全球范围内很常见。为了解释接种疫苗的鸡群中阿肯色州(Ark)型传染性支气管炎病毒的高流行率,评估了同时联合接种Ark和马萨诸塞州(Mass)型疫苗后疫苗干扰的可能性。用Ark和Mass组合疫苗进行眼内接种的鸡,在接种后9天(DPV)之前,泪液中Mass疫苗病毒占优势。即使将Mass和Ark疫苗接种到不同的眼睛中,Mass疫苗病毒也能够胜过Ark疫苗病毒。虽然Mass疫苗病毒在眼组织中显然比Ark疫苗具有复制优势,但Ark疫苗病毒似乎在扩散到气管和/或在气管中复制方面具有优势。当接种Ark或Mass疫苗的鸡饲养在一起时,Mass疫苗病毒能够传播到接种Ark疫苗的鸡,但在接种Mass疫苗的鸡中未检测到Ark疫苗。在引入接受两种疫苗的鸡群中的哨兵鸡的泪液中仅检测到Mass疫苗。此外,在接种不同Ark疫苗剂量的Ark和Mass两种疫苗的鸡的大多数泪液样本中,直到10 DPV才能检测到Ark疫苗病毒RNA,而在3 - 7 DPV时可检测到高浓度的Mass病毒RNA。相比之下,单独接种Ark疫苗的鸡在接种后早期Ark疫苗病毒有效复制。联合疫苗接种的鸡中Ark和Mass病毒的不同复制动态并未导致在21 DPV时对Ark攻击的保护作用降低。需要进一步研究以阐明检测到的病毒干扰是否决定了接种疫苗后其他时间点对攻击的保护差异。