Kiyosuke Makiko, Kibe Yasushi, Oho Megumi, Kusaba Koji, Shimono Nobuyuki, Hotta Taeko, Kang Dongchon, Shoubuike Takeo, Miyamoto Hiroshi
Division of Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
J Med Microbiol. 2015 Oct;64(10):1144-1150. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000136. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
Microflex LT (Bruker Daltonics) and VITEK MS (bioMérieux) are bacterial identification systems that are based on matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). For VITEK MS, two identification softwares, VITEK MS IVD (IVD) and SARAMIS (SARAMIS), are available. Microflex LT is equipped with MALDI Biotyper RTC software (Biotyper). Although the identification accuracy of each instrument has been compared for various bacteria, no detailed examination has been conducted for the identification accuracy of Clostridium difficile. In this report, we compared the three identification softwares for identification reproducibility in three ATCC C. difficile strains and identification accuracy in 50 clinical C. difficile isolates. The results showed 100, 91.7 and 100 % identification reproducibility accuracy of ATCC strains when examined by IVD, SARAMIS and Biotyper software, respectively. For the identification of the clinical isolates, all three softwares exhibited satisfactory identification accuracy of C. difficile. Among the 50 clinical isolates, seven showed identical toxin genotype corresponding to the exact ribotype. However, MALDI-TOF MS failed to identify them as the identical type. Based on the above results, we concluded that both types of MALDI-TOF MS reproducibly identified C. difficile; however, they are currently not suitable for typing of C. difficile clones.
Microflex LT(布鲁克道尔顿公司)和VITEK MS(生物梅里埃公司)是基于基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)的细菌鉴定系统。对于VITEK MS,有两种鉴定软件可供使用,即VITEK MS IVD(IVD)和SARAMIS(SARAMIS)。Microflex LT配备了MALDI Biotyper RTC软件(Biotyper)。尽管已经比较了每种仪器对各种细菌的鉴定准确性,但尚未对艰难梭菌的鉴定准确性进行详细检查。在本报告中,我们比较了这三种鉴定软件对三株ATCC艰难梭菌菌株的鉴定重现性以及对50株临床艰难梭菌分离株的鉴定准确性。结果显示,分别使用IVD、SARAMIS和Biotyper软件检测时,ATCC菌株的鉴定重现性准确率分别为100%、91.7%和100%。对于临床分离株的鉴定,所有三种软件对艰难梭菌的鉴定准确性均令人满意。在50株临床分离株中,有7株显示出与确切核糖体分型相对应的相同毒素基因型。然而,MALDI-TOF MS未能将它们鉴定为同一类型。基于上述结果,我们得出结论,两种类型的MALDI-TOF MS均可重现性地鉴定艰难梭菌;然而,它们目前不适用于艰难梭菌克隆的分型。