Kim Miseon, Ishioka Shinichi, Endo Toshiaki, Baba Tsuyoshi, Saito Tsuyoshi
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sapporo Medical University, Minami 1 jo, Nishi 16 chome, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8543, Japan.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Mar;293(3):651-7. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3860-5. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
Uterine cervical conization is related to adverse pregnancy outcomes in subsequent pregnancies. To deal with this problem, we started conservative coin-shaped conization for reproductive-aged patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Here we report both the obstetrical and oncological impacts of this operation in comparison with the standard cone-shaped resection.
A total of 401 women 44 years old or younger were treated in our hospital by CO2 laser conization between 2003 and 2012, and subsequently 50 patients became pregnant. The patients were divided into two groups, a standard cone-shaped conization group (until 2008) and a shallow coin-shaped conization group (beginning in 2008). The pregnancy courses and oncological prognoses of these two groups were studied.
Cone height reduction of about 3 mm was done. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to the occurrence of oncological complications. In the standard conization group, 18 of the 25 patients delivered at term. In the coin-shaped conization group, 20 of the 25 patients delivered at term. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to the occurrence of various obstetrical complications. However, the reduction rate of cervical length over the pregnancy was smaller in the coin-shaped group and the number of patients with a short cervix length of 2 cm or less was smaller in the coin-shaped group.
Although conservative coin-shaped conization did not markedly improve the obstetrical prognosis, this operative procedure improved the reduction rate of uterine cervical length over the pregnancy without any increase in oncological complications.
子宫颈锥切术与后续妊娠的不良妊娠结局相关。为解决这一问题,我们开始对患有宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)的育龄患者进行保守的盘状锥切术。在此,我们报告该手术与标准锥形切除术相比在产科和肿瘤学方面的影响。
2003年至2012年间,我院共对401名44岁及以下的女性进行了二氧化碳激光锥切术,随后有50名患者怀孕。患者分为两组,标准锥形锥切术组(截至2008年)和浅盘状锥切术组(从2008年开始)。研究了这两组的妊娠过程和肿瘤学预后。
锥形高度降低了约3毫米。然而,两组在肿瘤学并发症的发生方面没有显著差异。在标准锥切术组中,25名患者中有18名足月分娩。在盘状锥切术组中,25名患者中有20名足月分娩。两组在各种产科并发症的发生方面没有显著差异。然而,盘状组妊娠期间宫颈长度的缩短率较小,宫颈长度小于或等于2厘米的患者数量在盘状组中较少。
尽管保守的盘状锥切术没有明显改善产科预后,但该手术方法提高了妊娠期间子宫颈长度的缩短率,且肿瘤学并发症没有增加。