Suppr超能文献

非裔美国男性参与组织研究的障碍与策略

Barriers and Strategies to Participation in Tissue Research Among African-American Men.

作者信息

Drake Bettina F, Boyd Danielle, Carter Kimberly, Gehlert Sarah, Thompson Vetta Sanders

机构信息

Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.

Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2017 Mar;32(1):51-58. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0905-1.

Abstract

Before the burgeoning field of biospecimen collection can advance prevention and treatment methods, researchers must access diverse molecular data samples. However, minorities, especially African-American men, remain reticent to join these studies. This study, using theory-based approaches, investigated African-American men's barriers to participating in biorepository research. Fourteen focus groups were conducted among 70 African-American men (ages 40 to 80). The groups were stratified by prostate cancer history and educational attainment background. Participants identified perceived factors that promoted or hindered study participation when questioned about their knowledge and attitudes about biospecimen research. Ninety-four percent of participants indicated never participating in a study that collected biological samples. Barriers to their participation included lack of knowledge and understanding regarding biospecimen research practices and uses. In addition, they extensively cited a prevalent mistrust of the medical community and discomfort with study recruitment practices. African-American males were more willing to participate in biorepository studies with physician endorsement or if they understood that participation could benefit future generations. Men also wanted more recruitment and advertising done in familiar places.

摘要

在生物样本采集这个新兴领域能够推动预防和治疗方法的发展之前,研究人员必须获取多样的分子数据样本。然而,少数群体,尤其是非裔美国男性,仍然不愿参与这些研究。本研究采用基于理论的方法,调查了非裔美国男性参与生物样本库研究的障碍。对70名年龄在40至80岁之间的非裔美国男性进行了14个焦点小组访谈。这些小组按前列腺癌病史和教育程度背景进行分层。当被问及他们对生物样本研究的了解和态度时,参与者指出了促进或阻碍研究参与的因素。94%的参与者表示从未参与过收集生物样本的研究。他们参与的障碍包括对生物样本研究实践和用途缺乏了解。此外,他们广泛提及对医学界普遍存在的不信任以及对研究招募做法的不适。非裔美国男性更愿意在医生认可的情况下参与生物样本库研究,或者如果他们明白参与研究可能造福后代。男性还希望在熟悉的地方进行更多的招募和宣传活动。

相似文献

1
Barriers and Strategies to Participation in Tissue Research Among African-American Men.
J Cancer Educ. 2017 Mar;32(1):51-58. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0905-1.
2
Attitudes Toward Genomic Testing and Prostate Cancer Research Among Black Men.
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Nov;55(5 Suppl 1):S103-S111. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.05.028.
3
Recruiting Black/African American men for research on prostate cancer prevention.
Cancer. 2004 Mar 1;100(5):1017-25. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20029.
5
Recruiting and engaging African-American men in health research.
Nurse Res. 2018 Jun 7;26(1):8-12. doi: 10.7748/nr.2018.e1569. Epub 2018 May 8.
6
African American participation in health-related research studies: indicators for effective recruitment.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 Mar-Apr;19(2):110-8. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31825717ef.

引用本文的文献

2
The BabySeq Project: A clinical trial of genome sequencing in a diverse cohort of infants.
Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Oct 3;111(10):2094-2106. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.08.011. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
3
A toolkit for a modern gynecologic oncology tissue bank.
Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Oct;189:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.07.001. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
5
Bridging the Gap: Engaging Black Men in Lung Cancer Research Through Barbershop Collaboration.
Am J Mens Health. 2024 Jan-Feb;18(1):15579883241229417. doi: 10.1177/15579883241229417.
6
Community Trust, Attitudes and Preferences Related to Participation in Cancer Research in South Carolina.
J Community Health. 2024 Feb;49(1):100-107. doi: 10.1007/s10900-023-01251-3. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
7
Understanding men's beliefs and concerns about linking health data in the context of precision medicine.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Jun 7;7(1):e150. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.573. eCollection 2023.
9
Recruiting African American Prostate Cancer Survivors for a Population-based Biobank Study.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Jun 1;32(6):768-775. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-1157.

本文引用的文献

1
A Community Coalition to Address Cancer Disparities: Transitions, Successes and Challenges.
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Dec;30(4):616-22. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0746-3.
2
Disparities in knowledge and willingness to donate research biospecimens: a mixed-methods study in an underserved urban community.
J Community Genet. 2014 Oct;5(4):329-36. doi: 10.1007/s12687-014-0187-z. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
3
Why families choose not to participate in research: feedback from non-responders.
J Paediatr Child Health. 2013 Jan;49(1):57-62. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12020. Epub 2012 Dec 2.
4
Pilot intervention outcomes of an educational program for biospecimen research participation.
J Cancer Educ. 2013 Mar;28(1):52-9. doi: 10.1007/s13187-012-0434-0.
5
Attitudes of African-American parents about biobank participation and return of results for themselves and their children.
J Med Ethics. 2012 Sep;38(9):561-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100600. Epub 2012 May 9.
7
Biobank Recruitment: Motivations for Nonparticipation.
Biopreserv Biobank. 2009 Jun;7(2):119-121. doi: 10.1089/bio.2009.0006.
9
The role of race and trust in tissue/blood donation for genetic research.
Genet Med. 2010 Feb;12(2):116-21. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181cd6689.
10
Engaging the public on biobanks: outcomes of the BC biobank deliberation.
Public Health Genomics. 2009;12(4):203-15. doi: 10.1159/000167801. Epub 2008 Oct 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验