Gungor Nur Zeynep, Yamamoto Ryo, Paré Denis
Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University-Newark, Newark, New Jersey.
Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University-Newark, Newark, New Jersey
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Nov;114(5):2903-11. doi: 10.1152/jn.00677.2015. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
It has been proposed that the central amygdala (CeA), particularly its medial sector (CeM), generates brief fear responses to discrete conditioned cues, whereas the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) promotes long-lasting, anxiety-like states in response to more diffuse contingencies. Although it is believed that BNST-CeA interactions determine the transition between short- and long-duration responses, the nature of these interactions remains unknown. To shed light on this question, we used a double viral strategy to drive the expression of channelrhodopsin (ChR2) in BNST cells that project to CeA. Next, using patch-clamp recordings in vitro, we investigated the connectivity of infected cells to noninfected cells in BNST and compared the influence of BNST axons on neurons in the medial and lateral (CeL) parts of CeA. CeA-projecting BNST cells were concentrated in the anterolateral (AL) and anteroventral (AV) sectors of BNST. Dense plexuses of BNST axons were observed throughout CeA. In CeA and BNST, light-evoked excitatory postsynaptic potentials accounted for a minority of responses (0-9% of tested cells); inhibition prevailed. The incidence of inhibitory responses was higher in CeM than in CeL (66% and 43% of tested cells, respectively). Within BNST, the connections from CeA-projecting to non-CeA-targeting cells varied as a function of the BNST sector: 50% vs. 9% of tested cells exhibited light-evoked responses in BNST-AL vs. BNST-AV, respectively. Overall, these results suggest that via its projection to CeA, BNST exerts an inhibitory influence over cued fear and that BNST neurons projecting to CeA form contrasting connections in different BNST subnuclei.
有人提出,中央杏仁核(CeA),特别是其内侧部分(CeM),会对离散的条件线索产生短暂的恐惧反应,而终纹床核(BNST)则会对更弥散的意外情况做出反应,从而促进持久的、类似焦虑的状态。尽管人们认为BNST-CeA相互作用决定了短期和长期反应之间的转换,但这些相互作用的性质仍然未知。为了阐明这个问题,我们使用了双重病毒策略来驱动视紫红质通道蛋白(ChR2)在投射到CeA的BNST细胞中表达。接下来,我们在体外使用膜片钳记录,研究了受感染细胞与BNST中未受感染细胞的连接性,并比较了BNST轴突对CeA内侧和外侧(CeL)部分神经元的影响。投射到CeA的BNST细胞集中在BNST的前外侧(AL)和前腹侧(AV)部分。在整个CeA中都观察到了BNST轴突的密集丛。在CeA和BNST中,光诱发的兴奋性突触后电位占反应的少数(占测试细胞的0-9%);抑制作用占主导。CeM中抑制性反应的发生率高于CeL(分别为测试细胞的66%和43%)。在BNST内,从投射到CeA的细胞到非CeA靶向细胞的连接根据BNST部分而变化:在BNST-AL与BNST-AV中,分别有50%和9%的测试细胞表现出光诱发反应。总体而言,这些结果表明,通过其投射到CeA,BNST对线索性恐惧施加抑制性影响,并且投射到CeA的BNST神经元在不同的BNST亚核中形成对比性连接。