Vallabhaneni Raghuveer, Kalbaugh Corey A, Kouri Ana, Farber Mark A, Marston William A
Division of Vascular Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Division of Vascular Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC.
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jan;63(1):105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.07.095. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
Critical limb ischemia (CLI) has been defined as rest pain or tissue loss in patients who have an ankle-brachial index (ABI) ≤0.50, ankle pressure (AP) <70 mm Hg, or toe pressure (TP) <50 mm Hg. Data suggesting that these patients are at high risk for limb loss without successful revascularization are limited. This study was designed to identify limb loss and mortality rates in patients who did not respond to revascularization or who were not revascularized to determine whether CLI hemodynamic criteria accurately identify patients at high risk for limb loss.
Between 2008 and 2010, all patients undergoing lower extremity arterial duplex ultrasound testing at our hospital were identified. Those with ABI <0.50, AP <70 mm Hg, or TP <50 mm Hg were retrospectively reviewed to determine whether they had symptoms of rest pain, ischemic ulceration, or gangrene qualifying them for analysis in the database. Patients who underwent revascularization and subsequently had postrevascularization ABI, AP, or TP greater than the CLI criteria were removed from the cohort. Demographic factors, wound healing, amputation rates, and mortality were obtained and analyzed in relation to the initial APs and TPs. Outcomes were measured by Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis and Cox proportional hazards models.
In 381 patients identified in the study, 443 limbs met CLI criteria. After revascularization, 98 limbs with ABI or TP that improved to >0.5 and >50 mm Hg, respectively, were removed from the study cohort. In 45 limbs, patients did not respond to initial revascularization as their ABI, AP, or TP remained within CLI criteria. These limbs remained in the patient cohort, yielding a final group of 296 patients and 345 limbs. Mean follow-up was 2 years. In the entire patient cohort, limb loss occurred in 24% at 1 year and in 31% at 3 years. Mortality was 32% at 1 year and 56% at 3 years. Amputation-free survival was 54% at 1 year and 28% at 3 years. Lower TPs were associated with a statistically higher incidence of amputation. Among those with an initial TP ≤10 mm Hg (n = 85), limb loss occurred in 46% at 1 year and 60% at 3 years. This limb loss was significantly greater than limb loss among those with a TP of 31 to 50 mm Hg (n = 115; 18% at 3 years; P < .001) Amputation-free survival in patients with a TP ≤10 mm Hg was 8% at 3 years.
CLI is associated with a high mortality, but not all patients with currently defined hemodynamic criteria for CLI are at high risk of limb loss. Patients with a TP between 31 and 50 mm Hg (41% of the cohort) and not receiving revascularization or not responding hemodynamically to revascularization experienced a low risk of limb loss. We recommend revising the hemodynamic criteria for CLI to better identify patients at high risk for limb loss who require intervention to improve outcomes.
严重肢体缺血(CLI)被定义为踝肱指数(ABI)≤0.50、踝压(AP)<70 mmHg或趾压(TP)<50 mmHg的患者出现静息痛或组织缺失。关于这些患者在未成功进行血运重建的情况下肢体丧失风险很高的数据有限。本研究旨在确定对血运重建无反应或未接受血运重建的患者的肢体丧失和死亡率,以确定CLI血流动力学标准是否能准确识别肢体丧失高风险患者。
在2008年至2010年期间,识别出我院所有接受下肢动脉双功超声检查的患者。对ABI<0.50、AP<70 mmHg或TP<50 mmHg的患者进行回顾性分析,以确定他们是否有静息痛、缺血性溃疡或坏疽症状,从而有资格纳入数据库分析。接受血运重建且术后ABI、AP或TP大于CLI标准的患者被排除在队列之外。获取并分析人口统计学因素、伤口愈合情况、截肢率和死亡率与初始AP和TP的关系。通过Kaplan-Meier生存表分析和Cox比例风险模型测量结果。
在本研究中识别出的381例患者中,443条肢体符合CLI标准。血运重建后,98条ABI或TP分别改善至>0.5和>50 mmHg的肢体被排除在研究队列之外。在45条肢体中,患者对初始血运重建无反应,因为他们的ABI、AP或TP仍在CLI标准范围内。这些肢体仍留在患者队列中,最终形成了296例患者和345条肢体的组。平均随访时间为2年。在整个患者队列中,1年时肢体丧失发生率为24%,3年时为31%。1年时死亡率为32%,3年时为56%。无截肢生存率1年时为54%,3年时为28%。较低的TP与截肢发生率在统计学上的显著升高相关。在初始TP≤10 mmHg的患者(n = 85)中,1年时肢体丧失发生率为46%,3年时为60%。这种肢体丧失明显高于TP为31至50 mmHg的患者(n = 115;3年时为18%;P <.001)。TP≤10 mmHg的患者3年时无截肢生存率为8%。
CLI与高死亡率相关,但并非所有目前定义的CLI血流动力学标准患者都有高肢体丧失风险。TP在31至50 mmHg之间(占队列的41%)且未接受血运重建或对血运重建无血流动力学反应的患者,肢体丧失风险较低。我们建议修订CLI的血流动力学标准,以更好地识别需要干预以改善预后的肢体丧失高风险患者。