Suppr超能文献

大象抗癌的潜在机制及人类细胞对DNA损伤的比较反应

Potential Mechanisms for Cancer Resistance in Elephants and Comparative Cellular Response to DNA Damage in Humans.

作者信息

Abegglen Lisa M, Caulin Aleah F, Chan Ashley, Lee Kristy, Robinson Rosann, Campbell Michael S, Kiso Wendy K, Schmitt Dennis L, Waddell Peter J, Bhaskara Srividya, Jensen Shane T, Maley Carlo C, Schiffman Joshua D

机构信息

Departments of Pediatrics (Hematology/Oncology) and Oncological Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.

Genomics and Computational Biology Program, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

出版信息

JAMA. 2015 Nov 3;314(17):1850-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13134.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Evolutionary medicine may provide insights into human physiology and pathophysiology, including tumor biology.

OBJECTIVE

To identify mechanisms for cancer resistance in elephants and compare cellular response to DNA damage among elephants, healthy human controls, and cancer-prone patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A comprehensive survey of necropsy data was performed across 36 mammalian species to validate cancer resistance in large and long-lived organisms, including elephants (n = 644). The African and Asian elephant genomes were analyzed for potential mechanisms of cancer resistance. Peripheral blood lymphocytes from elephants, healthy human controls, and patients with LFS were tested in vitro in the laboratory for DNA damage response. The study included African and Asian elephants (n = 8), patients with LFS (n = 10), and age-matched human controls (n = 11). Human samples were collected at the University of Utah between June 2014 and July 2015.

EXPOSURES

Ionizing radiation and doxorubicin.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Cancer mortality across species was calculated and compared by body size and life span. The elephant genome was investigated for alterations in cancer-related genes. DNA repair and apoptosis were compared in elephant vs human peripheral blood lymphocytes.

RESULTS

Across mammals, cancer mortality did not increase with body size and/or maximum life span (eg, for rock hyrax, 1% [95% CI, 0%-5%]; African wild dog, 8% [95% CI, 0%-16%]; lion, 2% [95% CI, 0%-7%]). Despite their large body size and long life span, elephants remain cancer resistant, with an estimated cancer mortality of 4.81% (95% CI, 3.14%-6.49%), compared with humans, who have 11% to 25% cancer mortality. While humans have 1 copy (2 alleles) of TP53, African elephants have at least 20 copies (40 alleles), including 19 retrogenes (38 alleles) with evidence of transcriptional activity measured by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. In response to DNA damage, elephant lymphocytes underwent p53-mediated apoptosis at higher rates than human lymphocytes proportional to TP53 status (ionizing radiation exposure: patients with LFS, 2.71% [95% CI, 1.93%-3.48%] vs human controls, 7.17% [95% CI, 5.91%-8.44%] vs elephants, 14.64% [95% CI, 10.91%-18.37%]; P < .001; doxorubicin exposure: human controls, 8.10% [95% CI, 6.55%-9.66%] vs elephants, 24.77% [95% CI, 23.0%-26.53%]; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Compared with other mammalian species, elephants appeared to have a lower-than-expected rate of cancer, potentially related to multiple copies of TP53. Compared with human cells, elephant cells demonstrated increased apoptotic response following DNA damage. These findings, if replicated, could represent an evolutionary-based approach for understanding mechanisms related to cancer suppression.

摘要

重要性

进化医学可能为人类生理学和病理生理学,包括肿瘤生物学,提供见解。

目的

确定大象抗癌的机制,并比较大象、健康人类对照以及患李-弗劳梅尼综合征(LFS)的癌症易感患者对DNA损伤的细胞反应。

设计、设置和参与者:对36种哺乳动物的尸检数据进行了全面调查,以验证大型长寿生物(包括大象,n = 644)中的抗癌能力。分析了非洲象和亚洲象的基因组以寻找抗癌的潜在机制。在实验室中对大象、健康人类对照和LFS患者的外周血淋巴细胞进行体外DNA损伤反应测试。该研究包括非洲象和亚洲象(n = 8)、LFS患者(n = 10)以及年龄匹配的人类对照(n = 11)。人类样本于2014年6月至2015年7月在犹他大学采集。

暴露因素

电离辐射和阿霉素。

主要结局和测量指标

计算并比较不同物种间按体型和寿命划分的癌症死亡率。研究大象基因组中癌症相关基因的改变。比较大象与人类外周血淋巴细胞中的DNA修复和凋亡情况。

结果

在哺乳动物中,癌症死亡率并未随体型和/或最大寿命增加(例如,岩蹄兔为1%[95%CI,0%-5%];非洲野犬为8%[95%CI,0%-16%];狮子为2%[95%CI,0%-7%])。尽管大象体型巨大且寿命长,但它们仍具有抗癌能力,估计癌症死亡率为4.81%(95%CI,3.14%-6.49%),而人类的癌症死亡率为11%至25%。人类有1个TP53拷贝(2个等位基因),而非洲象至少有20个拷贝(40个等位基因),包括19个反转录基因(38个等位基因),通过逆转录聚合酶链反应测量有转录活性的证据。在DNA损伤反应中,与人类淋巴细胞相比,大象淋巴细胞以与TP53状态成比例的更高速率进行p53介导的凋亡(电离辐射暴露:LFS患者为2.71%[95%CI,1.93%-3.48%],人类对照为7.17%[95%CI,5.91%-8.44%],大象为14.64%[95%CI,10.91%-18.37%];P <.001;阿霉素暴露:人类对照为8.10%[95%CI,6.55%-9.66%],大象为24.77%[95%CI,23.0%-26.53%];P <.001)。

结论及相关性

与其他哺乳动物物种相比,大象的癌症发生率似乎低于预期,这可能与TP53的多个拷贝有关。与人类细胞相比,大象细胞在DNA损伤后表现出增强的凋亡反应。如果这些发现得到重复验证,可能代表一种基于进化的方法来理解与癌症抑制相关的机制。

相似文献

3
Illuminating Cancer Resistance in Elephants.
Cancer Discov. 2015 Dec;5(12):1229. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-NB2015-147. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
4
TP53 Gene and Cancer Resistance in Elephants.
JAMA. 2016 Apr 26;315(16):1789. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0449.
5
TP53 Gene and Cancer Resistance in Elephants.
JAMA. 2016 Apr 26;315(16):1789-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0446.
6
TP53 Gene and Cancer Resistance in Elephants.
JAMA. 2016 Apr 26;315(16):1788-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0440.
7
TP53 Gene and Cancer Resistance in Elephants--Reply.
JAMA. 2016 Apr 26;315(16):1790-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0457.
8
Evolutionary Adaptations to Risk of Cancer: Evidence From Cancer Resistance in Elephants.
JAMA. 2015 Nov 3;314(17):1806-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13153.
9
A Zombie LIF Gene in Elephants Is Upregulated by TP53 to Induce Apoptosis in Response to DNA Damage.
Cell Rep. 2018 Aug 14;24(7):1765-1776. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.07.042.
10
Younger age of cancer initiation is associated with shorter telomere length in Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
Cancer Res. 2007 Feb 15;67(4):1415-8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3682.

引用本文的文献

1
5
Advancing cancer research via comparative oncology.
Nat Rev Cancer. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1038/s41568-025-00841-8.
6
p53 prophylactic therapy for cancer prevention.
Cell Death Differ. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1038/s41418-025-01538-z.
7
Comparative reproductive pathology, a walk on the wild side.
F S Rep. 2025 Apr 15;6(Suppl 1):32-37. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2025.01.010. eCollection 2025 Apr.
8
Peto's paradox's relevance is off the scale.
Aging (Albany NY). 2025 May 29;17(6):1371-1374. doi: 10.18632/aging.206258.
9
Paradoxical indeed.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 May 13;122(19):e2504512122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2504512122. Epub 2025 May 5.
10
Reply to Compton et al.: Paradoxical misunderstanding.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 May 13;122(19):e2507210122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2507210122. Epub 2025 May 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Solutions to Peto's paradox revealed by mathematical modelling and cross-species cancer gene analysis.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Jul 19;370(1673). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0222.
3
Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
4
Li-Fraumeni syndrome: cancer risk assessment and clinical management.
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014 May;11(5):260-71. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.41. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
5
High-molecular-mass hyaluronan mediates the cancer resistance of the naked mole rat.
Nature. 2013 Jul 18;499(7458):346-9. doi: 10.1038/nature12234. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
6
Connecting molecular pathways to hereditary cancer risk syndromes.
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2013:81-90. doi: 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2013.33.81.
7
Cancer resistance in the blind mole rat is mediated by concerted necrotic cell death mechanism.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Nov 20;109(47):19392-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217211109. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
8
The GENCODE pseudogene resource.
Genome Biol. 2012 Sep 26;13(9):R51. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-9-r51.
9
Leadership in elephants: the adaptive value of age.
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Nov 7;278(1722):3270-6. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0168. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
10
Pseudogenes: pseudo-functional or key regulators in health and disease?
RNA. 2011 May;17(5):792-8. doi: 10.1261/rna.2658311. Epub 2011 Mar 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验