Livingstone Nuala, Hanratty Jennifer, McShane Rupert, Macdonald Geraldine
School of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, 6 College Park, Belfast, UK, BT7 1LP.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 29;2015(10):CD011546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011546.pub2.
People with Down syndrome are vulnerable to developing dementia at an earlier age than the general population. Alzheimer's disease and cognitive decline in people with Down syndrome can place a significant burden on both the person with Down syndrome and their family and carers. Various pharmacological interventions, including donepezil, galantamine, memantine and rivastigmine, appear to have some effect in treating cognitive decline in people without Down syndrome, but their effectiveness for those with Down syndrome remains unclear.
To assess the effectiveness of anti-dementia pharmacological interventions and nutritional supplements for treating cognitive decline in people with Down syndrome.
In January 2015, we searched CENTRAL, ALOIS (the Specialised Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group), Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, seven other databases, and two trials registers. In addition, we checked the references of relevant reviews and studies and contacted study authors, other researchers and relevant drug manufacturers to identify additional studies.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-dementia pharmacological interventions or nutritional supplements for adults (aged 18 years and older) with Down syndrome, in which treatment was administered and compared with either placebo or no treatment.
Two review authors independently assessed the risk of bias of included trials and extracted the relevant data. Review authors contacted study authors to obtain missing information where necessary.
Only nine studies (427 participants) met the inclusion criteria for this review. Four of these (192 participants) assessed the effectiveness of donepezil, two (139 participants) assessed memantine, one (21 participants) assessed simvastatin, one study (35 participants) assessed antioxidants, and one study (40 participants) assessed acetyl-L-carnitine.Five studies focused on adults aged 45 to 55 years, while the remaining four studies focused on adults aged 20 to 29 years. Seven studies were conducted in either the USA or UK, one between Norway and the UK, and one in Japan. Follow-up periods in studies ranged from four weeks to two years. The reviewers judged all included studies to be at low or unclear risk of bias.Analyses indicate that for participants who received donepezil, scores in measures of cognitive functioning (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.27 to 1.13) and measures of behaviour (SMD 0.42, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.89) were similar to those who received placebo. However, participants who received donepezil were significantly more likely to experience an adverse event (odds ratio (OR) 0.32, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.62). The quality of this body of evidence was low. None of the included donepezil studies reported data for carer stress, institutional/home care, or death.For participants who received memantine, scores in measures of cognitive functioning (SMD 0.05, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.52), behaviour (SMD -0.17, 95% CI -0.46 to 0.11), and occurrence of adverse events (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.17) were similar to those who received placebo. The quality of this body of evidence was low. None of the included memantine studies reported data for carer stress, institutional/home care, or death.Due to insufficient data, it was possible to provide a narrative account only of the outcomes for simvastatin, antioxidants, and acetyl-L-carnitine. Results from one pilot study suggest that participants who received simvastatin may have shown a slight improvement in cognitive measures.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Due to the low quality of the body of evidence in this review, it is difficult to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of any pharmacological intervention for cognitive decline in people with Down syndrome.
唐氏综合征患者比普通人群更容易在较早年龄患上痴呆症。唐氏综合征患者的阿尔茨海默病和认知能力下降会给患者本人及其家庭和照顾者带来沉重负担。各种药物干预措施,包括多奈哌齐、加兰他敏、美金刚和 rivastigmine,似乎对治疗非唐氏综合征患者的认知能力下降有一定效果,但它们对唐氏综合征患者的有效性仍不明确。
评估抗痴呆药物干预和营养补充剂对治疗唐氏综合征患者认知能力下降的有效性。
2015 年 1 月,我们检索了 CENTRAL、ALOIS(Cochrane 痴呆与认知改善小组的专业注册库)、Ovid MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、其他七个数据库以及两个试验注册库。此外,我们检查了相关综述和研究的参考文献,并联系了研究作者、其他研究人员和相关药物制造商以识别其他研究。
针对 18 岁及以上唐氏综合征成年人的抗痴呆药物干预或营养补充剂的随机对照试验(RCT),其中进行了治疗并与安慰剂或不治疗进行比较。
两位综述作者独立评估纳入试验的偏倚风险并提取相关数据。必要时,综述作者联系研究作者以获取缺失信息。
只有九项研究(427 名参与者)符合本综述的纳入标准。其中四项(192 名参与者)评估了多奈哌齐的有效性,两项(139 名参与者)评估了美金刚,一项(21 名参与者)评估了辛伐他汀,一项研究(35 名参与者)评估了抗氧化剂,一项研究(40 名参与者)评估了乙酰左旋肉碱。五项研究关注 45 至 55 岁的成年人,其余四项研究关注 20 至 29 岁的成年人。七项研究在美国或英国进行,一项在挪威和英国之间进行,一项在日本进行。研究的随访期从四周到两年不等。综述作者判断所有纳入研究的偏倚风险为低或不明确。分析表明,对于接受多奈哌齐治疗的参与者,认知功能测量得分(标准化均值差(SMD)0.52,95%置信区间(CI)-0.27 至 1.13)和行为测量得分(SMD 0.42,95%CI -0.06 至 0.89)与接受安慰剂的参与者相似。然而,接受多奈哌齐治疗的参与者发生不良事件的可能性显著更高(优势比(OR)0.