Suppr超能文献

在南加州太平洋岛民进行的一项子宫颈抹片检查随机研究中,基于社区参与式研究法的招募与保留策略调整

CBPR-Informed Recruitment and Retention Adaptations in a Randomized Study of Pap Testing Among Pacific Islanders in Southern California.

作者信息

Tanjasiri Sora Park, Weiss Jie W, Santos Lola, Flores Peter, Flores Preciosa, Lacsamana Jasmine DeGuzman, Paige Ciara, Mouttapa Michele, Quitugua Lourdes, Taito Peniamina, May Vanessa Tui, Tupua Marina, Vaikona Elenoa, Vaivao Dorothy, Vunileva Isileli

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Autumn;9(3):389-96. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0067.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pacific Islanders (PIs) experience high cervical cancer rates in the United States. Stage of diagnosis is also later for PIs than non-Hispanic Whites. The Pap test is severely underutilized among PIs: only 71% of Asian American and Pacific Islander women age 25 years or older received a Pap test within the last 3 years (U.S. average, 82%). Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is increasingly seen as an essential approach in designing and conducting culturally relevant and appropriate studies that reduce cancer incidence and other health disparities among minority and other medically underserved populations.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to describe the lessons learned thus far regarding the identification, recruitment, and retention of PI community organizations and members into a CBPR-informed, randomized, community trial promoting Pap testing.

METHODS

This 5-year study used CBPR to develop and test the efficacy of a social support intervention for Chamorro, Samoan, and Tongan women to increase Pap testing in southern California. Eligible women were between the ages of 21 and 65, and married or in a long-term relationship with a man for at least 5 years. Women and their husbands or significant others received a 2-hour, culturally tailored workshop that include a group activity, information on Pap testing, a video, and corresponding materials. Comparison participants received a brochure about Pap testing. Three waves of data are collected from all participants: pretest (before workshop or brochure), posttest 1 (immediately after workshop or brochure), and posttest 2 (6 months follow-up).

RESULTS

Of the 76 organizations approached to participate in the study, 67 (88.2%) eventually agreed to participate. Thus far, 473 women and 419 men completed the study pretest, post-test, education, and 6-month follow-up. Only 242 women and 204 men of the eligible participants have completed the follow-up survey (63.5% of women and 60.5% of men retained after 6 months).

LESSONS LEARNED

The main strategy to overcome initial recruitment challenges was study staff persistence, because they averaged five contacts with each church or clan leader before receiving confirmation that an educational session can be scheduled. Personal connections provided an introduction to the most appropriate church or clan leader. Other efforts for retention include creation of an online version of the survey, re-attending church services, and creating special events organized around clan activities.

CONCLUSIONS

Although CBPR improves the cultural competence and relevance of study activities for ethnically diverse populations, selected past research shows that it does not ensure that such designs overcome all of the unique challenges in ethnically diverse communities. PI-specific organizational recruitment and individual retention is influenced by study issues and cultural factors in each community.

摘要

背景

太平洋岛民(PI)在美国患宫颈癌的比例很高。与非西班牙裔白人相比,PI被诊断出患癌时的阶段也更晚。巴氏试验在PI人群中严重未得到充分利用:在过去3年里,年龄在25岁及以上的亚裔美国人和太平洋岛民女性中,只有71%接受了巴氏试验(美国平均水平为82%)。基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)越来越被视为设计和开展具有文化相关性和适当性的研究的重要方法,这些研究可降低少数族裔和其他医疗服务不足人群的癌症发病率及其他健康差距。

目的

本文旨在描述到目前为止在将PI社区组织和成员识别、招募并保留到一项基于CBPR的、促进巴氏试验的随机社区试验中所吸取的经验教训。

方法

这项为期5年的研究采用CBPR来开发和测试一种社会支持干预措施对查莫罗、萨摩亚和汤加女性的效果,以增加南加州的巴氏试验参与率。符合条件的女性年龄在21至65岁之间,已婚或与男性保持长期关系至少5年。女性及其丈夫或重要他人参加了一个为期2小时、根据文化定制的工作坊,其中包括小组活动、巴氏试验信息、视频及相应材料。对照组参与者收到了一份关于巴氏试验的宣传册。从所有参与者那里收集了三轮数据:预测试(工作坊或宣传册之前)、后测试1(工作坊或宣传册之后立即进行)和后测试2(6个月随访)。

结果

在被邀请参与该研究的76个组织中,67个(88.2%)最终同意参与。到目前为止,473名女性和419名男性完成了研究的预测试、后测试、教育及6个月随访。在符合条件的参与者中,只有242名女性和204名男性完成了随访调查(6个月后女性保留率为63.5%,男性为60.5%)。

经验教训

克服最初招募挑战的主要策略是研究人员的坚持不懈,因为他们平均与每位教会或氏族领袖联系了5次才得到可以安排教育课程的确认。人际关系为介绍最合适的教会或氏族领袖提供了途径。其他保留参与者的努力包括创建在线调查问卷版本、再次参加教会服务以及围绕氏族活动组织特别活动。

结论

尽管CBPR提高了针对不同种族人群的研究活动的文化能力和相关性,但以往的部分研究表明,它并不能确保此类设计克服不同种族社区中的所有独特挑战。特定于PI的组织招募和个人保留受到每个社区的研究问题和文化因素的影响。

相似文献

2
Design and Outcomes of a Community Trial to Increase Pap Testing in Pacific Islander Women.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Sep;28(9):1435-1442. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-1306. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
3
Associations Between Women's Perception of Their Husbands'/Partners' Social Support and Pap Screening in Pacific Islander Communities.
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2016 Jan;28(1):61-71. doi: 10.1177/1010539515613412. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
4
Biospecimen Education Among Pacific Islanders in Southern California.
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Aug;34(4):658-665. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1352-6.
5
Increasing pap smear utilization among Samoan women: results from a community based participatory randomized trial.
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009 May;20(2 Suppl):85-101. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0160.
7
Breast and cervical cancer screening among Latinas attending culturally specific educational programs.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2008 Fall;2(3):195-204. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0034.
8
Awareness of and Support for HPV Vaccination Among Pacific Islander Women in Southern California.
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Oct;37(5):1372-1377. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-01965-9. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
9
Balancing community and university aims in community-based participatory research: a Pacific Islander youth study.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2011 Spring;5(1):19-25. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2011.0001.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of interventions aimed at reducing inequalities along the cancer continuum: A scoping review.
Int J Cancer. 2025 Sep 15;157(6):1043-1054. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35478. Epub 2025 May 26.
2
Traditional and new lifestyle interventions to prevent breast cancer recurrence (TANICA): a qualitative study.
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Mar 17;31(4):218. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07663-0.
3
Recruitment and retention of underrepresented and vulnerable populations to research.
Public Health Nurs. 2021 Nov;38(6):1102-1115. doi: 10.1111/phn.12943. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
4
Best Practices for Community-Engaged Research with Pacific Islander Communities in the US and USAPI: A Scoping Review.
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2019;30(4):1302-1330. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2019.0101.
5
New directions for diabetes prevention and management in behavioral medicine.
J Behav Med. 2017 Feb;40(1):127-144. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9802-2. Epub 2016 Oct 14.

本文引用的文献

3
The Peru cervical cancer prevention study (PERCAPS): community-based participatory research in Manchay, Peru.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Jan;23(1):141-7. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e318275b007.
4
What promotes cervical cancer screening among Chamorro women in California?
J Cancer Educ. 2012 Dec;27(4):725-30. doi: 10.1007/s13187-012-0394-4.
7
Results of a community-based randomized trial to increase colorectal cancer screening among Filipino Americans.
Am J Public Health. 2010 Nov;100(11):2228-34. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.176230. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
10
Linking science and policy through community-based participatory research to study and address health disparities.
Am J Public Health. 2010 Apr 1;100 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S81-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.165720. Epub 2010 Feb 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验