Suppr超能文献

医疗保健使用者就患有危及生命疾病的儿童与医疗保健专业人员沟通的经历:一项定性系统评价方案

Healthcare users' experiences of communicating with healthcare professionals about children who have life-limiting conditions: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

作者信息

Ekberg Stuart, Bradford Natalie, Herbert Anthony, Danby Susan, Yates Patsy

机构信息

1 School of Nursing and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia2 School of Early Childhood and Health and Wellbeing and Happiness Program, Child and Youth Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia3 Center for Evidence Based Healthy Ageing: an Affiliate Center of the Joanna Briggs Institute, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia4 Center for Online Health, University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia5 Pediatric Palliative Care Service, Lady Cilento Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):33-42. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2413.

Abstract

REVIEW QUESTION/OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to identify and synthesize the best international qualitative evidence on healthcare users' experiences of communication with healthcare professionals about children who have life-limiting conditions. For the purposes of this review, "healthcare users" will be taken to include children who have life-limiting conditions and their families. The question to be addressed is:What are healthcare users' experiences of communicating with healthcare professionals about children who have life-limiting conditions?

BACKGROUND

The prospect of the death of a child from an incurable medical condition is harrowing, yet finding a way to discuss this prospect is crucial to maximize the quality of life for such children and their families. High-quality communication is well recognized as a core skill health care professionals need to maximize the quality of care they provide. This skill is valued by service users, who consistently rate it as one of the highest priorities for the care they receive. Evidence suggests, however, that healthcare professionals can feel ill-equipped or uncomfortable communicating with and about such children. Therefore, it is important to understand what represents high-quality communication and what is involved in accomplishing this within pediatric palliative care.In recent decades there has been an increased focus on providing palliative care for children who have life-limiting conditions. These are conditions for which no cure is available and for which the probable outcome is premature death. Palliative care may also be appropriate for children who have life-threatening conditions; these are conditions where there is not only a high probability of premature death but also a chance of long-term survival into adulthood Although pediatric palliative care is underpinned by the same philosophy as adult palliative care, children who have life-limiting conditions and their families have particular needs that distinguish them from users of adult palliative care. For example, at a physical level children are more likely than adults to have non-malignant conditions that follow trajectories in which children oscillate between feeling relatively well and acutely unwell. The social dynamic of their care is also radically different, particularly given the role of parents or guardians in making surrogate decisions about their child's care. Such factors warrant considering pediatric palliative care as distinct from palliative care more generally.Although the particular circumstances of children who have life-limiting conditions have led to development of pediatric palliative care, the particular provisions of this care differs among countries. One aspect of variation is the age range of patients. Pediatric palliative care is usually provided to neonates, infants, children, adolescents and young adults, but international variations in the definitions of these age ranges, particularly for adolescents and young adults, means pediatric palliative care is provided to different age groups in different countries. This review therefore adopts a pragmatic rather than an age-based definition of a pediatric palliative care, considering all studies relating to service users who are being cared for by pediatric rather than adult healthcare services.In catering for the unique needs of children who have life-limiting conditions and their families, pediatric palliative care aims to achieve pain and symptom management, enhanced dignity and quality of life, and psychosocial and spiritual care. It also seeks to incorporate care for patients' broader families and facilitating access to appropriate services and support. High-quality communication is crucial for achieving these aims. It enables healthcare users and providers to make decisions that underpin the care that is provided and the quality of the life that is possible for patients and their families.Although both users and providers recognize the value of high-quality communication with and about children who have life-limiting conditions, this does not mean that these stakeholders necessarily share the same perspective of what constitutes high-quality communication and the best way of accomplishing this. Focusing on healthcare users' experiences of communication with healthcare professionals about children who have life-limiting conditions, the present review will explore the subjective impact of professionals' communication on the people for whom they provide care.It may be necessary to consider a range of contextual factors to understand healthcare users' experiences of communicating with healthcare professionals about children who have life-limiting conditions. For instance, age, developmental stage, cognitive capacity, emotional and social strengths, and family dynamics can influence a child's level of involvement in discussions about their condition and care. Although there are factors that appear more consistent across the range of pediatric palliative care users, such as parents' preferences for being treated by healthcare professionals as partners in making decisions about the care of their child, there is not always such consistency. Nor is it clear whether such findings can be generalized across different cultural contexts. In appraising existing research, this systematic review will therefore consider the relationship between the context of individual studies and their reported findings.The primary aim of this review is to identify, appraise and synthesize existing qualitative evidence of healthcare users' experiences of communicating with healthcare professionals about children who have life-limiting conditions. The review will consider relevant details of these findings, particularly whether factors like age are relevant for understanding particular experiences of communication. An outcome of this review will be the identification of best available qualitative evidence that can be used to inform professional practice, as well as an identification of priorities for future research in pediatric palliative care.A preliminary search in MEDLINE and CINAHL found primary studies exploring healthcare users' experiences of aspects of communicating with healthcare professionals about children who have life-limiting conditions. A search was also conducted for existing systematic reviews in PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, and PROSPERO. No systematic reviews on this topic were found.

摘要

综述问题/目标:本综述的目的是识别并综合关于医疗保健使用者与医疗保健专业人员就患有危及生命疾病的儿童进行沟通的最佳国际定性证据。就本综述而言,“医疗保健使用者”将包括患有危及生命疾病的儿童及其家庭。要解决的问题是:医疗保健使用者与医疗保健专业人员就患有危及生命疾病的儿童进行沟通的体验是怎样的?

背景

儿童因无法治愈的疾病而死亡的前景令人痛苦,但找到讨论这一前景的方法对于最大限度提高此类儿童及其家庭的生活质量至关重要。高质量沟通是医疗保健专业人员提高所提供护理质量所需的一项核心技能,这一点已得到广泛认可。服务使用者重视这项技能,他们一直将其列为所接受护理的最高优先事项之一。然而,有证据表明,医疗保健专业人员在与这类儿童沟通以及谈论这类儿童时可能会感到准备不足或不自在。因此,了解什么是高质量沟通以及在儿科姑息治疗中实现高质量沟通涉及哪些方面很重要。近几十年来,人们越来越关注为患有危及生命疾病的儿童提供姑息治疗。这些疾病无法治愈,可能的结果是过早死亡。姑息治疗也可能适用于患有危及生命疾病的儿童;这些疾病不仅有很高的过早死亡可能性,而且有长期存活至成年的机会。虽然儿科姑息治疗与成人姑息治疗基于相同的理念,但患有危及生命疾病的儿童及其家庭有特殊需求,这使他们有别于成人姑息治疗的使用者。例如,在身体层面,儿童比成人更有可能患有非恶性疾病,其病情发展轨迹是儿童在感觉相对良好和极度不适之间波动。他们护理的社会动态也截然不同,特别是考虑到父母或监护人在为孩子的护理做出替代决策方面的作用。这些因素使得有必要将儿科姑息治疗与更一般的姑息治疗区分开来。尽管患有危及生命疾病的儿童的特殊情况促使了儿科姑息治疗的发展,但这种护理的具体规定在不同国家有所不同。差异的一个方面是患者的年龄范围。儿科姑息治疗通常提供给新生儿、婴儿、儿童、青少年和年轻人,但这些年龄范围的定义在国际上存在差异,特别是对于青少年和年轻人,这意味着不同国家为不同年龄组提供儿科姑息治疗。因此,本综述采用务实而非基于年龄的儿科姑息治疗定义,考虑所有与由儿科而非成人医疗保健服务照顾的服务使用者相关的研究。为了满足患有危及生命疾病的儿童及其家庭的独特需求,儿科姑息治疗旨在实现疼痛和症状管理、提高尊严和生活质量以及提供心理社会和精神护理。它还寻求为患者的更广泛家庭提供护理,并促进获得适当的服务和支持。高质量沟通对于实现这些目标至关重要。它使医疗保健使用者和提供者能够做出决策,这些决策是所提供护理以及患者及其家庭可能的生活质量的基础。虽然使用者和提供者都认识到与患有危及生命疾病的儿童进行高质量沟通的价值,但这并不意味着这些利益相关者对什么构成高质量沟通以及实现这一目标的最佳方式必然有相同的看法。本综述关注医疗保健使用者与医疗保健专业人员就患有危及生命疾病的儿童进行沟通的体验,将探讨专业人员沟通对他们所照顾的人的主观影响。可能有必要考虑一系列背景因素,以了解医疗保健使用者与医疗保健专业人员就患有危及生命疾病的儿童进行沟通的体验。例如,年龄、发育阶段、认知能力、情感和社会优势以及家庭动态会影响儿童参与关于其病情和护理讨论的程度。虽然在儿科姑息治疗使用者范围内有一些因素似乎更一致,例如父母希望医疗保健专业人员将他们视为参与孩子护理决策的伙伴,但情况并非总是如此一致。也不清楚这些发现是否可以在不同文化背景中推广。因此,在评估现有研究时,本系统综述将考虑个别研究的背景与其报告结果之间的关系。本综述的主要目的是识别、评估和综合关于医疗保健使用者与医疗保健专业人员就患有危及生命疾病的儿童进行沟通的现有定性证据。综述将考虑这些发现的相关细节,特别是年龄等因素是否与理解特定的沟通体验相关。本综述的一个结果将是识别可用于为专业实践提供信息的最佳现有定性证据,以及确定儿科姑息治疗未来研究的优先事项。在MEDLINE和CINAHL中进行的初步搜索发现了一些初步研究,这些研究探讨了医疗保健使用者与医疗保健专业人员就患有危及生命疾病的儿童进行沟通的各个方面的体验。还在PubMed、CINAHL、EMBASE、PsycINFO、Cochrane系统评价数据库、JBI系统评价与实施报告数据库和PROSPERO中搜索了现有的系统评价。未找到关于该主题的系统评价。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验