Suppr超能文献

采用基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱和Vitek 2系统对阳性血培养瓶中的细菌进行直接鉴定和药敏试验。

Direct Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria From Positive Blood Culture Bottles by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry and the Vitek 2 System.

作者信息

Jo Sung Jin, Park Kang Gyun, Han Kyungja, Park Dong Jin, Park Yeon-Joon

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Lab Med. 2016 Mar;36(2):117-23. doi: 10.3343/alm.2016.36.2.117.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the reliability and accuracy of the combined use of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) bacterial identification and Vitek 2 antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for bacteria from positive blood culture bottles.

METHODS

Direct identification and AST were performed in parallel to the standard methods in monomicrobial positive blood culture bottles. In total, 254 isolates grown on aerobic and/or anaerobic bottles were identified with MALDI-TOF Vitek MS (bioMérieux, France), and 1,978 microorganism/antimicrobial agent combinations were assessed. For isolates from anaerobic bottles, an aliquot of the culture broth was centrifuged, washed, and filtered through a nylon mesh. For isolates from aerobic/pediatric bottles, a lysis step using 9.26% ammonium chloride solution and 2% saponin solution was included.

RESULTS

The overall correct identification rate was 81.8% (208/254) and that for gram-positive/gram-negative isolates was 73.9%/92.6%, respectively, and it was 81.8%, 87.6%, and 57.9% for isolates from aerobic, anaerobic, and pediatric bottles, respectively. Identification was not possible in 45 cases, and most of these isolates were streptococci (N=14) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (N=11). Misidentification occurred only in one case. Compared with standard methods, direct AST showed 97.9% (1,936/1,978) agreement with very major error of 0.25%, major error of 0.05%, and minor error of 1.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

This simple and cost-effective sample preparation method gives reliable results for the direct identification and AST of bacteria. For the identification of streptococci and coagulase-negative staphylococci, the method should be further improved.

摘要

背景

我们评估了将基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)细菌鉴定与Vitek 2抗菌药物敏感性试验(AST)联合用于阳性血培养瓶中细菌检测的可靠性和准确性。

方法

在单微生物阳性血培养瓶中,与标准方法并行进行直接鉴定和AST。总共用MALDI-TOF Vitek MS(法国生物梅里埃公司)对在需氧和/或厌氧瓶中生长的254株分离菌进行了鉴定,并评估了1978种微生物/抗菌药物组合。对于厌氧瓶中的分离菌,取一份培养液离心、洗涤并通过尼龙网过滤。对于需氧/儿科瓶中的分离菌,加入使用9.26%氯化铵溶液和2%皂苷溶液的裂解步骤。

结果

总体正确鉴定率为81.8%(208/254),革兰氏阳性/革兰氏阴性分离菌的正确鉴定率分别为73.9%/92.6%,需氧瓶、厌氧瓶和儿科瓶中分离菌的正确鉴定率分别为81.8%、87.6%和57.9%。45例无法进行鉴定,这些分离菌大多为链球菌(N = 14)和凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(N = 11)。仅1例出现错误鉴定。与标准方法相比,直接AST显示一致性为97.9%(1936/1978),极重大误差为0.25%,重大误差为0.05%,微小误差为1.8%。

结论

这种简单且经济高效的样品制备方法可为细菌的直接鉴定和AST提供可靠结果。对于链球菌和凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌的鉴定,该方法应进一步改进。

相似文献

5
Microbial identification and automated antibiotic susceptibility testing directly from positive blood cultures using MALDI-TOF MS and VITEK 2.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 Jan;35(1):75-82. doi: 10.1007/s10096-015-2510-y. Epub 2015 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

2
Detection of the Level of Interleukin-8 in the Serum of Burn Patients by ELISA Technique.
Arch Razi Inst. 2023 Jun 30;78(3):1087-1093. doi: 10.22092/ARI.2022.359993.2529. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
On the Etiological Relevance of and in Superficial and Deep Infections - A Hypothesis-Forming, Retrospective Assessment.
Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2019 Oct 16;9(4):124-130. doi: 10.1556/1886.2019.00021. eCollection 2019 Dec 25.
10
Application of MALDI-TOF MS to rapid identification of anaerobic bacteria.
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Nov 7;19(1):941. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4584-0.

本文引用的文献

5
Advancement in the routine identification of anaerobic bacteria by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 Sep;32(9):1183-92. doi: 10.1007/s10096-013-1865-1. Epub 2013 Apr 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验