Hiraoka Regina, Crouch Julie L, Reo Gim, Wagner Michael F, Milner Joel S, Skowronski John J
Center for the Study of Family Violence and Sexual Assault Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA.
Child Abuse Negl. 2016 Feb;52:177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.10.023. Epub 2016 Jan 2.
The present study extends prior research examining the association between borderline personality disorder (BPD) features and child physical abuse (CPA) risk. We hypothesized that: (1) high CPA risk parents (compared to low CPA risk parents) would more often report clinically elevated levels of BPD features; (2) high CPA risk parents with elevated BPD features would represent a particularly high-risk subgroup; and (3) the association between elevated BPD features and CPA risk would be partially explained by emotion regulation difficulties. General population parents (N=106; 41.5% fathers) completed self-report measures of BPD features, CPA risk, and emotion regulation difficulties. Results support the prediction that BPD features are more prevalent among high (compared to low) CPA risk parents. Among the parents classified as high CPA risk (n=45), one out of three (33.3%) had elevated BPD features. In contrast, none of the 61 low CPA risk parents reported elevated BPD symptoms. Moreover, 100% of the parents with elevated BPD features (n=15) were classified as high-risk for CPA. As expected, high CPA risk parents with elevated BPD features (compared to high CPA risk parents with low BPD features) obtained significantly higher scores on several Child Abuse Potential Inventory scales, including the overall abuse scale (d=1.03). As predicted, emotion regulation difficulties partially explained the association between BPD features and CPA risk. Findings from the present study suggest that a subset of high CPA risk parents in the general population possess clinically significant levels of BPD symptoms and these parents represent an especially high-risk subgroup. Interventions designed to address BPD symptoms, including emotion regulation difficulties, appear to be warranted in these cases.
本研究扩展了先前关于边缘型人格障碍(BPD)特征与儿童身体虐待(CPA)风险之间关联的研究。我们假设:(1)高CPA风险的父母(与低CPA风险的父母相比)更常报告临床水平升高的BPD特征;(2)具有升高的BPD特征的高CPA风险父母将代表一个特别高风险的亚组;(3)升高的BPD特征与CPA风险之间的关联将部分由情绪调节困难来解释。一般人群中的父母(N = 106;41.5%为父亲)完成了关于BPD特征、CPA风险和情绪调节困难的自我报告测量。结果支持了以下预测:BPD特征在高(与低相比)CPA风险的父母中更为普遍。在被归类为高CPA风险的父母(n = 45)中,三分之一(33.3%)具有升高的BPD特征。相比之下,61名低CPA风险父母中没有一人报告有升高的BPD症状。此外,具有升高的BPD特征的父母(n = 15)中有100%被归类为CPA高风险。正如预期的那样,具有升高的BPD特征的高CPA风险父母(与具有低BPD特征的高CPA风险父母相比)在几个儿童虐待潜在性量表上获得了显著更高的分数,包括总体虐待量表(d = 1.03)。正如预测的那样,情绪调节困难部分解释了BPD特征与CPA风险之间的关联。本研究的结果表明,一般人群中一部分高CPA风险的父母具有临床上显著水平的BPD症状,这些父母代表了一个特别高风险的亚组。在这些情况下,旨在解决BPD症状(包括情绪调节困难)的干预措施似乎是必要的。