Huguelet P, Brandt P-Y, Mohr S
Département de santé mentale et de psychiatrie, hôpitaux universitaires de Genève, 8, rue du 31-Decembre, 1207 Genève, Suisse.
Faculty of Theology, Lausanne University, BFSH 2, 1015 Lausanne, Suisse.
Encephale. 2016 Jun;42(3):219-25. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2015.12.005. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
There is evidence that psychiatrists are rarely aware of how religion may intervene in their patient's life. That is particularly obvious concerning patients with psychosis. Yet, even for patients featuring delusions with religious content, religious activities and spiritual coping may have a favourable influence. Indeed, patients with psychosis can use religion to cope with life difficulties related to their psychotic condition, in a social perspective but also in order to gain meaning in their lives. Also, religion may be part of explanatory models about their disorder with, in some cases, a significant influence on treatment adhesion.
This paper describes a prospective randomized study about a spiritual assessment performed by the psychiatrists of patients with schizophrenia. The outpatient clinics in which the sample was collected are affiliated with the department of psychiatry at the university hospitals of Geneva. Eighty-four outpatients with psychosis were randomized into two groups: an experimental group receiving both traditional treatment and spiritual assessment with their psychiatrist and a control group of patients receiving only their usual treatment. Psychiatrists were supervised by a clinician (PH) and a psychologist of religions (PYB) for each patient in the spiritual assessment group. Data were collected from both groups before and after 3 months of clinical follow-up.
Spiritual assessment was well-tolerated by all patients. Moreover, their wish to discuss religious matters with their psychiatrist persisted following the spiritual assessment. Even though clinicians acknowledged the usefulness of the supervision for some patients, especially when religion was of importance for clinical care, they reported being moderately interested in applying spiritual assessments in clinical settings. Compared to the control group, there were no differences observed in the 3 months' outcome in terms of primary outcome measures for satisfaction with care, yet the attendance at the appointments was significantly increased in the group with spiritual assessment. The same result was found when restricting analyses to patients for whom an intervention was suggested or patients who invested more in religion. Areas of potential intervention were frequent both in a psychiatric and psychotherapeutical perspective.
Spiritual assessment appears to be useful for patients with psychosis. This is in accordance with the recommendations of the World Psychiatric Association which promotes considering the whole person in clinical care. Spiritual assessment is quite simple to perform, providing that clinicians do not prescribe or promote religion, and that no critical comments are made concerning religious issues. Clinicians do not need to know in depth the religious domains of each of their patients, as it appears that each patient accommodates his/her religious background his/her own way.
有证据表明,精神科医生很少意识到宗教可能如何干预患者的生活。这在患有精神病的患者中尤为明显。然而,即使对于具有宗教内容妄想的患者,宗教活动和精神应对可能也会产生有利影响。事实上,患有精神病的患者可以利用宗教来应对与其精神病状况相关的生活困难,从社会角度来看,也是为了在生活中获得意义。此外,宗教可能是关于其疾病的解释模型的一部分,在某些情况下,对治疗依从性有重大影响。
本文描述了一项关于精神科医生对精神分裂症患者进行精神评估的前瞻性随机研究。收集样本的门诊诊所隶属于日内瓦大学医院的精神科。84名患有精神病的门诊患者被随机分为两组:实验组接受传统治疗以及精神科医生进行的精神评估,对照组患者仅接受常规治疗。在精神评估组中,每位患者的精神科医生由一名临床医生(PH)和一名宗教学心理学家(PYB)进行监督。在3个月的临床随访前后,从两组收集数据。
所有患者对精神评估的耐受性良好。此外,在精神评估后,他们希望与精神科医生讨论宗教事务的意愿依然存在。尽管临床医生承认对一些患者进行监督是有用的,特别是当宗教对临床护理很重要时,但他们表示对在临床环境中应用精神评估的兴趣一般。与对照组相比,在对护理满意度的主要结局指标方面,3个月的结果没有差异,但在接受精神评估的组中,预约就诊的出勤率显著提高。当将分析限制在建议进行干预的患者或对宗教投入更多的患者时,也发现了相同的结果。从精神病学和心理治疗的角度来看,潜在干预领域都很常见。
精神评估似乎对患有精神病的患者有用。这与世界精神病学协会的建议一致,该协会提倡在临床护理中考虑患者的整体情况。精神评估执行起来相当简单,前提是临床医生不规定或宣扬宗教,并且不对宗教问题发表批判性评论。临床医生无需深入了解每位患者的宗教领域,因为似乎每位患者都以自己的方式适应其宗教背景。