Speakman John R, Blount Jonathan D, Bronikowski Anne M, Buffenstein Rochelle, Isaksson Caroline, Kirkwood Tom B L, Monaghan Pat, Ozanne Susan E, Beaulieu Michaël, Briga Michael, Carr Sarah K, Christensen Louise L, Cochemé Helena M, Cram Dominic L, Dantzer Ben, Harper Jim M, Jurk Diana, King Annette, Noguera Jose C, Salin Karine, Sild Elin, Simons Mirre J P, Smith Shona, Stier Antoine, Tobler Michael, Vitikainen Emma, Peaker Malcolm, Selman Colin
Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of Aberdeen Tillydrone Avenue Aberdeen AB24 2TZ UK; State Key Laboratory of Molecular Developmental Biology Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China.
Centre for Ecology and Conservation University of Exeter Penryn Campus Cornwall TR10 9FE UK.
Ecol Evol. 2015 Nov 17;5(24):5745-57. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1790. eCollection 2015 Dec.
Life-history theory concerns the trade-offs that mold the patterns of investment by animals between reproduction, growth, and survival. It is widely recognized that physiology plays a role in the mediation of life-history trade-offs, but the details remain obscure. As life-history theory concerns aspects of investment in the soma that influence survival, understanding the physiological basis of life histories is related, but not identical, to understanding the process of aging. One idea from the field of aging that has gained considerable traction in the area of life histories is that life-history trade-offs may be mediated by free radical production and oxidative stress. We outline here developments in this field and summarize a number of important unresolved issues that may guide future research efforts. The issues are as follows. First, different tissues and macromolecular targets of oxidative stress respond differently during reproduction. The functional significance of these changes, however, remains uncertain. Consequently there is a need for studies that link oxidative stress measurements to functional outcomes, such as survival. Second, measurements of oxidative stress are often highly invasive or terminal. Terminal studies of oxidative stress in wild animals, where detailed life-history information is available, cannot generally be performed without compromising the aims of the studies that generated the life-history data. There is a need therefore for novel non-invasive measurements of multi-tissue oxidative stress. Third, laboratory studies provide unrivaled opportunities for experimental manipulation but may fail to expose the physiology underpinning life-history effects, because of the benign laboratory environment. Fourth, the idea that oxidative stress might underlie life-history trade-offs does not make specific enough predictions that are amenable to testing. Moreover, there is a paucity of good alternative theoretical models on which contrasting predictions might be based. Fifth, there is an enormous diversity of life-history variation to test the idea that oxidative stress may be a key mediator. So far we have only scratched the surface. Broadening the scope may reveal new strategies linked to the processes of oxidative damage and repair. Finally, understanding the trade-offs in life histories and understanding the process of aging are related but not identical questions. Scientists inhabiting these two spheres of activity seldom collide, yet they have much to learn from each other.
生活史理论关注塑造动物在繁殖、生长和生存之间投资模式的权衡取舍。人们普遍认识到生理学在生活史权衡的调节中发挥作用,但具体细节仍不清楚。由于生活史理论涉及影响生存的躯体投资方面,理解生活史的生理基础与理解衰老过程相关但并不相同。衰老领域的一个在生活史领域获得了相当大关注的观点是,生活史权衡可能由自由基产生和氧化应激介导。我们在此概述该领域的进展,并总结一些可能指导未来研究工作的重要未解决问题。这些问题如下。首先,氧化应激的不同组织和大分子靶点在繁殖过程中的反应不同。然而,这些变化的功能意义仍不确定。因此,需要开展将氧化应激测量与功能结果(如生存)联系起来的研究。其次,氧化应激的测量通常具有高度侵入性或为终末测量。在可获得详细生活史信息的野生动物中进行氧化应激的终末研究,通常在不损害生成生活史数据的研究目标的情况下无法进行。因此,需要新颖的多组织氧化应激非侵入性测量方法。第三,实验室研究提供了无与伦比的实验操作机会,但由于实验室环境良好,可能无法揭示支撑生活史效应的生理学机制。第四,氧化应激可能是生活史权衡基础的观点没有做出足够具体的、可检验的预测。此外,缺乏可供对比预测的良好替代理论模型。第五,生活史变异极其多样,以检验氧化应激可能是关键调节因子这一观点。到目前为止,我们只是触及了表面。拓宽研究范围可能会揭示与氧化损伤和修复过程相关的新策略。最后,理解生活史中的权衡与理解衰老过程是相关但不同的问题。从事这两个活动领域研究的科学家很少相互交流,但他们有很多可以相互学习的地方。