Al-Itejawi Hoda H M, van Uden-Kraan Cornelia F, Vis André N, Nieuwenhuijzen Jakko A, Hofstee Myrna J A, van Moorselaar Reindert Jeroen A, Verdonck-de Leeuw Irma M
Department of Urology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Apr;25(7-8):1131-44. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13120. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
To develop a patient decision aid and to prepare an overview of requirements for implementation.
We developed a decision aid that fits the preferences of patients and health care professionals to ensure adequate uptake in clinical practice.
A participatory design approach was used to acquire insight into preferences regarding the content and design of a decision aid and into barriers and aspects of the decision aid that facilitate implementation in clinical practice.
Three focus group interviews with patients, their partners and health care professionals were conducted. A prototype of the decision aid was developed and presented to patients (n = 14) and health care professionals (n = 13) in semi-structured interviews. Patients (n = 5) participated in a usability study. Data were analysed by two independent coders.
Health care professionals considered medical information on treatments and side effects as the most important aspect to be included in the decision aid. Patients also focused on nonmedical considerations, such as location. Both expected the decision aid to support patients in making a treatment choice. According to health care professionals, the oncology nurse was the most suitable to discuss the decision aid with patients, while some patients preferred to discuss the patient decision aid with the urologist. The main barrier to implementation of the decision aid was said to be the expectation that it is time and money consuming, while the incorporation of the decision aid into clinical guidelines and basing the content on these guidelines, would promote implementation.
By using a participatory design approach a patient decision aid was designed to meet patients' and health care professionals' needs. Insight was also gained on requirements for implementation.
Wide-scale implementation of decision aids is desirable. An overview is provided of requirements for implementation to successfully incorporate a decision aid into clinical practice.
开发一种患者决策辅助工具,并准备一份实施要求概述。
我们开发了一种符合患者和医护人员偏好的决策辅助工具,以确保在临床实践中得到充分应用。
采用参与式设计方法,以深入了解对决策辅助工具内容和设计的偏好,以及决策辅助工具在临床实践中实施的障碍和促进因素。
对患者、其伴侣和医护人员进行了三次焦点小组访谈。开发了决策辅助工具的原型,并在半结构化访谈中向患者(n = 14)和医护人员(n = 13)展示。5名患者参与了可用性研究。由两名独立编码员对数据进行分析。
医护人员认为关于治疗和副作用的医学信息是决策辅助工具中最重要的方面。患者也关注非医学因素,如地点。双方都期望决策辅助工具能帮助患者做出治疗选择。据医护人员称,肿瘤学护士最适合与患者讨论决策辅助工具,而一些患者更喜欢与泌尿科医生讨论患者决策辅助工具。决策辅助工具实施的主要障碍据说是人们认为它既耗时又费钱,而将决策辅助工具纳入临床指南并以这些指南为基础确定内容,将促进其实施。
通过采用参与式设计方法,设计了一种满足患者和医护人员需求的患者决策辅助工具。还获得了关于实施要求的见解。
决策辅助工具的广泛实施是可取的。提供了一份实施要求概述,以成功地将决策辅助工具纳入临床实践。