Barbara Melosky, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia; Quincy Chu, Cross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta; Rosalyn Juergens, McMaster University, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton; Natasha Leighl, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of Toronto; Deanna McLeod, Kaleidoscope Strategic, Toronto, Ontario; and Vera Hirsh, Montreal General Hospital, Royal Victoria Hospital, and McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 10;34(14):1676-88. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.8049. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is globally prevalent and associated with high rates of mortality. Immune checkpoint pathways are often exploited by tumors to evade immunity-mediated destruction, and checkpoint inhibitors can reactivate tumor-related immune responses. This review considers available clinical evidence for the use of checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of second-line advanced NSCLC.
Our systematic search revealed 20 clinical trials evaluating checkpoint inhibitors in the second-line setting, three of which were randomized trials comparing programmed cell death protein 1 and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors to docetaxel, the current standard of care in this setting.
A randomized phase II trial comparing the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab to docetaxel did not demonstrate improved survival for atezolizumab in patients overall, although a trend toward improved survival with increased PD-L1 expression was apparent. Twin phase III trials showed significantly improved survival for the programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor nivolumab compared with docetaxel in patients with both squamous and nonsquamous disease. PD-L1 expression correlated with improved survival in patients with nonsquamous disease, and patients with low levels of PD-L1 expression (< 10%) and those with EGFR mutations are unlikely to benefit. Checkpoint inhibitor therapy is generally well tolerated and associated with low rates of grade 3 or 4 adverse events compared with standard care.
Level 1 evidence exists to support the use of nivolumab as second-line treatment of patients with squamous advanced NSCLC, as well as in select patients with nonsquamous disease. Benefits remain unknown in patients with targetable driver mutations, and use of PD-L1 expression to guide therapy remains controversial. Results from ongoing randomized trials evaluating biomarkers and other checkpoint inhibitors will further our understanding of this rapidly evolving area of oncology.
非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)在全球范围内普遍存在,且死亡率较高。肿瘤经常利用免疫检查点途径来逃避免疫介导的破坏,而检查点抑制剂可以重新激活与肿瘤相关的免疫反应。本综述考虑了在二线治疗晚期 NSCLC 中使用检查点抑制剂的现有临床证据。
我们的系统搜索显示了 20 项评估二线治疗中检查点抑制剂的临床试验,其中 3 项是比较程序性死亡蛋白 1 和程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)抑制剂与多西他赛的随机试验,后者是该治疗环境下的当前标准治疗方法。
一项比较 PD-L1 抑制剂阿替利珠单抗与多西他赛的随机 II 期试验并未显示阿替利珠单抗在总体患者中改善了生存,尽管随着 PD-L1 表达的增加,生存改善的趋势明显。两项双 III 期试验显示,与多西他赛相比,程序性死亡蛋白 1 抑制剂纳武利尤单抗在鳞状和非鳞状疾病患者中均显著改善了生存。PD-L1 表达与非鳞状疾病患者的生存改善相关,而 PD-L1 表达水平低(<10%)和 EGFR 突变的患者可能无法受益。与标准治疗相比,检查点抑制剂治疗通常耐受性良好,且发生 3 级或 4 级不良事件的几率较低。
有一级证据支持将纳武利尤单抗作为鳞状晚期 NSCLC 二线治疗的选择,以及在选择的非鳞状疾病患者中使用。在有可靶向驱动突变的患者中获益情况仍不清楚,且使用 PD-L1 表达来指导治疗仍存在争议。正在进行的评估生物标志物和其他检查点抑制剂的随机试验的结果将进一步加深我们对这一快速发展的肿瘤学领域的理解。