Suppr超能文献

全球十大健康研究公共及慈善资助者:他们资助的领域以及资金分配方式。

The 10 largest public and philanthropic funders of health research in the world: what they fund and how they distribute their funds.

作者信息

Viergever Roderik F, Hendriks Thom C C

机构信息

Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Metamedica, VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Feb 18;14:12. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0074-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about who the main public and philanthropic funders of health research are globally, what they fund and how they decide what gets funded. This study aims to identify the 10 largest public and philanthropic health research funding organizations in the world, to report on what they fund, and on how they distribute their funds.

METHODS

The world's key health research funding organizations were identified through a search strategy aimed at identifying different types of funding organizations. Organizations were ranked by their reported total annual health research expenditures. For the 10 largest funding organizations, data were collected on (1) funding amounts allocated towards 20 health areas, and (2) schemes employed for distributing funding (intramural/extramural, project/'people'/organizational and targeted/untargeted funding). Data collection consisted of a review of reports and websites and interviews with representatives of funding organizations. Data collection was challenging; data were often not reported or reported using different classification systems.

RESULTS

Overall, 55 key health research funding organizations were identified. The 10 largest funding organizations together funded research for $37.1 billion, constituting 40% of all public and philanthropic health research spending globally. The largest funder was the United States National Institutes of Health ($26.1 billion), followed by the European Commission ($3.7 billion), and the United Kingdom Medical Research Council ($1.3 billion). The largest philanthropic funder was the Wellcome Trust ($909.1 million), the largest funder of health research through official development assistance was USAID ($186.4 million), and the largest multilateral funder was the World Health Organization ($135.0 million). Funding distribution mechanisms and funding patterns varied substantially between the 10 largest funders.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for increased transparency about who the main funders of health research are globally, what they fund and how they decide on what gets funded, and for improving the evidence base for various funding models. Data on organizations' funding patterns and funding distribution mechanisms are often not available, and when they are, they are reported using different classification systems. To start increasing transparency in health research funding, we have established www.healthresearchfunders.org that lists health research funding organizations worldwide and their health research expenditures.

摘要

背景

对于全球健康研究的主要公共和慈善资助者是谁、他们资助什么以及如何决定资助对象,人们了解甚少。本研究旨在确定全球十大公共和慈善健康研究资助组织,报告它们的资助内容以及资金分配方式。

方法

通过旨在识别不同类型资助组织的搜索策略,确定了全球主要的健康研究资助组织。根据各组织报告的年度健康研究总支出对其进行排名。对于十大资助组织,收集了以下数据:(1)分配给20个健康领域的资金数额,以及(2)用于资金分配的方案(内部/外部、项目/人员/组织以及定向/非定向资助)。数据收集包括对报告和网站的审查以及对资助组织代表的访谈。数据收集具有挑战性;数据往往未被报告,或者报告时使用的分类系统不同。

结果

总体而言,共识别出55个主要的健康研究资助组织。十大资助组织总共为研究提供了371亿美元的资金,占全球所有公共和慈善健康研究支出的40%。最大的资助者是美国国立卫生研究院(261亿美元),其次是欧盟委员会(37亿美元)和英国医学研究理事会(13亿美元)。最大的慈善资助者是惠康信托基金会(9.091亿美元),通过官方发展援助提供健康研究资金最多的是美国国际开发署(1.864亿美元),最大的多边资助者是世界卫生组织(1.35亿美元)。十大资助者之间的资金分配机制和资助模式差异很大。

结论

有必要提高全球健康研究主要资助者的透明度,包括他们资助什么以及如何决定资助对象,并改善各种资助模式的证据基础。关于组织资助模式和资金分配机制的数据往往不可得,即便有,报告时使用的分类系统也各不相同。为了开始提高健康研究资助的透明度,我们创建了www.healthresearchfunders.org,该网站列出了全球健康研究资助组织及其健康研究支出情况。

相似文献

3
Mapping philanthropic support of science.
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 24;14(1):9397. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58367-2.
6
Global Fund investments in human resources for health: innovation and missed opportunities for health systems strengthening.
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Dec;29(8):986-97. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt080. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
8
Top health research funders' guidance on selecting journals for funded research.
F1000Res. 2021 Feb 11;10:100. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.27745.2. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging Health Disparity Gaps in Alzheimer's Disease among Marginalized Populations: Clinical Proteomics as a Case Study.
ACS Bio Med Chem Au. 2025 Jul 8;5(4):505-518. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomedchemau.5c00074. eCollection 2025 Aug 20.
2
Exit strategies for health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Jul 21;3(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00182-6.
3
The second Trump administration: A policy analysis of challenges and opportunities for European health policymakers.
Health Policy. 2025 Aug;158:105350. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105350. Epub 2025 May 18.
6
Faster and farther towards the abyss: global health accelerators instead of tangible changes.
Global Health. 2024 Aug 2;20(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12992-024-01050-y.
7
Two decades of research capacity strengthening and reciprocal learning on sexual and reproductive health in East Africa - a point of (no) return.
Glob Health Action. 2024 Dec 31;17(1):2353957. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2353957. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
9
Accounting for future populations in health research.
Bioethics. 2024 Jun;38(5):401-409. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13284. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
10
Consideration of sex as a biological variable in diabetes research across twenty years.
Biol Sex Differ. 2024 Feb 26;15(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13293-024-00595-2.

本文引用的文献

3
Wellcome Trust overhauls its funding framework.
Lancet. 2014 Nov 29;384(9958):1913. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)62264-9.
4
Lobbying sways NIH grants.
Nature. 2014 Nov 6;515(7525):19. doi: 10.1038/515019a.
6
A database on global health research in Africa.
Lancet Glob Health. 2013 Aug;1(2):e64-e65. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70012-3. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
7
Funding. NIH institute considers broad shift to 'people' awards.
Science. 2014 Jul 25;345(6195):366-7. doi: 10.1126/science.345.6195.366.
8
Funding transdisciplinary research. NIH Roadmap/Common Fund at 10 years.
Science. 2014 Jul 18;345(6194):274-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1255860. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
9
Global biomedical R&D expenditures.
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 19;370(25):2451. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1405176.
10
Chasing the money.
Science. 2014 Apr 4;344(6179):24-5. doi: 10.1126/science.344.6179.24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验