Monahan Amanda M, Madison Sarah J, Loland Vanessa J, Sztain Jacklynn F, Bishop Michael L, Sandhu NavParkash S, Bellars Richard H, Khatibi Bahareh, Schwartz Alexandra K, Ahmed Sonya S, Donohue Michael C, Nomura Scott T, Wen Cindy H, Ilfeld Brian M
From the *Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California; †Department of Orthopedics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California; ‡Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California; §School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California; ‖Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California; and ¶OUTCOMES RESEARCH Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio.
Anesth Analg. 2016 May;122(5):1689-95. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001211.
Multiple studies have demonstrated that, for single-injection popliteal sciatic nerve blocks, block characteristics are dependent upon local anesthetic injection relative to the sciatic nerve bifurcation. In contrast, this relation remains unexamined for continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blocks. We, therefore, tested the hypothesis that postoperative analgesia is improved with the perineural catheter tip at the level of the bifurcation compared with 5 cm proximal to the bifurcation.
Preoperatively, subjects having moderately painful foot or ankle surgery were randomly assigned to receive an ultrasound-guided subepimyseal perineural catheter inserted either at or 5 cm proximal to the sciatic nerve bifurcation. Subjects received a single injection of mepivacaine 1.5% either via the insertion needle preoperatively or the perineural catheter postoperatively, followed by an infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% (6 mL/h basal, 4 mL bolus, and 30-min lockout) for the study duration. The primary end point was the average pain measured on a numeric rating scale (0-10) in the 3 hours before a data collection telephone call the morning after surgery.
The average numeric rating scale of subjects with a catheter inserted at the sciatic nerve bifurcation (n = 64) was a median (10th, 25th to 75th, and 90th quartiles) of 3.0 (0.0, 2.4-5.0, and 7.0) vs 2.0 (0.0, 1.0-4.0, and 5.0) for subjects with a catheter inserted proximal to the bifurcation (n = 64; P = 0.008). Similarly, maximum pain scores were greater in the group at the bifurcation: 6.0 (3.0, 4.4-8.0, and 9.0) vs 5.0 (0.0, 3.0-8.0, and 10.0) (P = 0.019). Differences between the groups for catheter insertion time, opioid rescue dose, degree of numbness in the foot/toes, catheter dislodgement, and fluid leakage did not reach statistical significance.
For continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blocks, a catheter inserted 5 cm proximal to the sciatic nerve bifurcation provides superior postoperative analgesia in subjects having moderately painful foot or ankle surgery compared with catheters located at the bifurcation. This is in marked contrast with single-injection popliteal sciatic nerve blocks for which benefits are afforded to local anesthetic injection distal, rather than proximal, to the bifurcation.
多项研究表明,对于单次注射腘窝坐骨神经阻滞,阻滞特征取决于局部麻醉药相对于坐骨神经分叉处的注射位置。相比之下,对于连续腘窝坐骨神经阻滞,这种关系尚未得到研究。因此,我们检验了这样一个假设:与位于分叉处近端5 cm处相比,将神经周围导管尖端置于分叉水平可改善术后镇痛效果。
术前,将接受中度疼痛的足部或踝部手术的受试者随机分配,接受超声引导下在坐骨神经分叉处或其近端5 cm处插入的皮下筋膜下神经周围导管。受试者在术前通过穿刺针或术后通过神经周围导管接受一次1.5%甲哌卡因注射,随后在研究期间输注0.2%罗哌卡因(基础量6 mL/h,推注量4 mL,锁定时间30分钟)。主要终点是术后次日上午数据收集电话前3小时用数字评分量表(0 - 10)测量的平均疼痛程度。
在坐骨神经分叉处插入导管组(n = 64)受试者的平均数字评分量表评分为中位数(第10、25至75以及第90四分位数)3.0(0.0,2.4 - 5.0,7.0),而在分叉处近端插入导管组(n = 64)受试者为2.0(0.0,1.0 - 4.0,5.0)(P = 0.008)。同样,分叉处组的最大疼痛评分更高:6.0(3.0,4.4 - 8.0,9.0)对比5.0(0.0,3.0 - 8.将神经周围导管尖端置于分叉水平可改善术后镇痛效果。
术前,将接受中度疼痛的足部或踝部手术的受试者随机分配,接受超声引导下在坐骨神经分叉处或其近端5 cm处插入的皮下筋膜下神经周围导管。受试者在术前通过穿刺针或术后通过神经周围导管接受一次1.5%甲哌卡因注射,随后在研究期间输注0.2%罗哌卡因(基础量6 mL/h,推注量4 mL,锁定时间30分钟)。主要终点是术后次日上午数据收集电话前3小时用数字评分量表(从0至10)测量的平均疼痛程度。
在坐骨神经分叉处插入导管组(n = 64)受试者的平均数字评分量表评分为中位数(第10、25至75以及第90四分位数)3.0(0.0,2.4至5.0,7.0),而在分叉处近端插入导管组(n = 64)受试者为2.0(0.0,1.0至4.0,5.0)(P = 0.008)。同样,分叉处组的最大疼痛评分更高:6.0(3.0,4.4至8.0,9.0)对比5.0(0.0,3.0至8.0,10.0)(P = 0.019)。两组在导管插入时间、阿片类药物解救剂量、足部/脚趾麻木程度、导管移位和液体渗漏方面的差异未达到统计学意义。
对于连续腘窝坐骨神经阻滞,在接受中度疼痛的足部或踝部手术的受试者中,与位于分叉处的导管相比,在坐骨神经分叉处近端5 cm处插入的导管可提供更好的术后镇痛效果。这与单次注射腘窝坐骨神经阻滞形成显著对比,对于单次注射腘窝坐骨神经阻滞,在分叉处远端而非近端注射局部麻醉药会带来益处。 0,10.0)(P = 0.019)。两组在导管插入时间、阿片类药物解救剂量、足部/脚趾麻木程度、导管移位和液体渗漏方面的差异未达到统计学意义。
对于连续腘窝坐骨神经阻滞,在接受中度疼痛的足部或踝部手术的受试者中,与位于分叉处的导管相比,在坐骨神经分叉处近端5 cm处插入的导管可提供更好的术后镇痛效果。这与单次注射腘窝坐骨神经阻滞形成显著对比,对于单次注射腘窝坐骨神经阻滞,在分叉处远端而非近端注射局部麻醉药会带来益处。