Goldenberg Don L, Clauw Daniel J, Palmer Roy E, Clair Andrew G
Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 May;91(5):640-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
Multiple pharmacotherapies are available for the treatment of fibromyalgia (FM), including opioid analgesics. We postulate that the mechanism of action of traditional opioids predicts their lack of efficacy in FM. Literature searches of the MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases were conducted using the search term opioid AND fibromyalgia to identify relevant articles, with no date limitations set. Citation lists in returned articles and personal archives of references were also examined for additional relevant items, and articles were selected based on the expert opinions of the authors. We found no evidence from clinical trials that opioids are effective for the treatment of FM. Observational studies have found that patients with FM receiving opioids have poorer outcomes than patients receiving nonopioids, and FM guidelines recommend against the use of opioid analgesics. Despite this, and despite the availability of alternative Food and Drug Administration-approved pharmacotherapies and the efficacy of nonpharmacologic therapies, opioids are commonly used in the treatment of FM. Factors associated with opioid use include female sex; geographic variation; psychological factors; a history of opioid use, misuse, or abuse; and patient or physician preference. The long-term use of opioid analgesics is of particular concern in the United States given the ongoing public health emergency relating to excess prescription opioid consumption. The continued use of opioids to treat FM despite a proven lack of efficacy, lack of support from treatment guidelines, and the availability of approved pharmacotherapy options provides a cautionary tale for their use in other chronic pain conditions.
有多种药物疗法可用于治疗纤维肌痛(FM),包括阿片类镇痛药。我们推测传统阿片类药物的作用机制预示了它们在FM治疗中缺乏疗效。使用搜索词“阿片类药物”和“纤维肌痛”对MEDLINE和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行文献检索,以识别相关文章,未设置日期限制。还检查了返回文章中的参考文献列表和个人参考文献档案以获取其他相关条目,并根据作者的专家意见选择文章。我们没有从临床试验中发现阿片类药物对FM治疗有效的证据。观察性研究发现,接受阿片类药物治疗的FM患者比接受非阿片类药物治疗的患者预后更差,并且FM治疗指南不建议使用阿片类镇痛剂。尽管如此,尽管有美国食品药品监督管理局批准的替代药物疗法可供使用,并且非药物疗法也有疗效,但阿片类药物仍常用于FM的治疗。与使用阿片类药物相关的因素包括女性性别;地域差异;心理因素;有阿片类药物使用、滥用或成瘾史;以及患者或医生的偏好。鉴于与过量处方阿片类药物消费相关的持续公共卫生紧急情况,在美国,阿片类镇痛剂的长期使用尤其令人担忧。尽管已证实缺乏疗效、缺乏治疗指南的支持且有批准的药物治疗选择,但仍继续使用阿片类药物治疗FM,这为其在其他慢性疼痛病症中的使用提供了一个警示案例。