Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
JAMA. 2016 Apr 19;315(15):1624-45. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.1464.
Primary care clinicians find managing chronic pain challenging. Evidence of long-term efficacy of opioids for chronic pain is limited. Opioid use is associated with serious risks, including opioid use disorder and overdose.
To provide recommendations about opioid prescribing for primary care clinicians treating adult patients with chronic pain outside of active cancer treatment, palliative care, and end-of-life care.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) updated a 2014 systematic review on effectiveness and risks of opioids and conducted a supplemental review on benefits and harms, values and preferences, and costs. CDC used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework to assess evidence type and determine the recommendation category.
Evidence consisted of observational studies or randomized clinical trials with notable limitations, characterized as low quality using GRADE methodology. Meta-analysis was not attempted due to the limited number of studies, variability in study designs and clinical heterogeneity, and methodological shortcomings of studies. No study evaluated long-term (≥1 year) benefit of opioids for chronic pain. Opioids were associated with increased risks, including opioid use disorder, overdose, and death, with dose-dependent effects.
There are 12 recommendations. Of primary importance, nonopioid therapy is preferred for treatment of chronic pain. Opioids should be used only when benefits for pain and function are expected to outweigh risks. Before starting opioids, clinicians should establish treatment goals with patients and consider how opioids will be discontinued if benefits do not outweigh risks. When opioids are used, clinicians should prescribe the lowest effective dosage, carefully reassess benefits and risks when considering increasing dosage to 50 morphine milligram equivalents or more per day, and avoid concurrent opioids and benzodiazepines whenever possible. Clinicians should evaluate benefits and harms of continued opioid therapy with patients every 3 months or more frequently and review prescription drug monitoring program data, when available, for high-risk combinations or dosages. For patients with opioid use disorder, clinicians should offer or arrange evidence-based treatment, such as medication-assisted treatment with buprenorphine or methadone.
The guideline is intended to improve communication about benefits and risks of opioids for chronic pain, improve safety and effectiveness of pain treatment, and reduce risks associated with long-term opioid therapy.
初级保健临床医生发现管理慢性疼痛具有挑战性。阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛长期疗效的证据有限。阿片类药物的使用与严重风险相关,包括阿片类药物使用障碍和过量用药。
为初级保健临床医生治疗接受癌症治疗、姑息治疗和临终关怀以外的慢性疼痛的成年患者提供有关阿片类药物处方的建议。
疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)更新了 2014 年关于阿片类药物有效性和风险的系统评价,并进行了一项补充评价,评估了益处和危害、价值观和偏好以及成本。CDC 使用了推荐评估、制定和评估(GRADE)框架来评估证据类型,并确定建议类别。
证据包括观察性研究或随机临床试验,但存在显著局限性,使用 GRADE 方法学评估为低质量。由于研究数量有限、研究设计和临床异质性的变化以及研究方法上的缺陷,因此没有尝试进行荟萃分析。没有研究评估阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛的长期(≥1 年)益处。阿片类药物与包括阿片类药物使用障碍、过量用药和死亡在内的风险增加有关,具有剂量依赖性效应。
共有 12 项建议。最重要的是,治疗慢性疼痛首选非阿片类药物治疗。只有当疼痛和功能的益处预计超过风险时,才应使用阿片类药物。在开始使用阿片类药物之前,临床医生应与患者设定治疗目标,并考虑如果益处不超过风险,如何停止使用阿片类药物。当使用阿片类药物时,临床医生应开最低有效剂量,在考虑将剂量增加到每天 50 毫克吗啡当量或更高剂量时,仔细重新评估益处和风险,并尽可能避免同时使用阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物。临床医生应每 3 个月或更频繁地与患者一起评估继续使用阿片类药物治疗的益处和危害,并在有处方药物监测计划数据时,审查高风险组合或剂量。对于阿片类药物使用障碍患者,临床医生应为患者提供或安排基于证据的治疗,例如丁丙诺啡或美沙酮药物辅助治疗。
本指南旨在改善有关慢性疼痛阿片类药物益处和风险的沟通,提高疼痛治疗的安全性和有效性,并降低长期阿片类药物治疗相关的风险。