Greatorex Zoe F, Olson Sarah H, Singhalath Sinpakone, Silithammavong Soubanh, Khammavong Kongsy, Fine Amanda E, Weisman Wendy, Douangngeun Bounlom, Theppangna Watthana, Keatts Lucy, Gilbert Martin, Karesh William B, Hansel Troy, Zimicki Susan, O'Rourke Kathleen, Joly Damien O, Mazet Jonna A K
Wildlife Conservation Society, Wildlife Health & Health Policy Program, Bronx, New York, United States of America.
University of Wisconsin Madison, Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 23;11(3):e0150666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150666. eCollection 2016.
Although the majority of emerging infectious diseases can be linked to wildlife sources, most pathogen spillover events to people could likely be avoided if transmission was better understood and practices adjusted to mitigate risk. Wildlife trade can facilitate zoonotic disease transmission and represents a threat to human health and economies in Asia, highlighted by the 2003 SARS coronavirus outbreak, where a Chinese wildlife market facilitated pathogen transmission. Additionally, wildlife trade poses a serious threat to biodiversity. Therefore, the combined impacts of Asian wildlife trade, sometimes termed bush meat trade, on public health and biodiversity need assessing. From 2010 to 2013, observational data were collected in Lao PDR from markets selling wildlife, including information on volume, form, species and price of wildlife; market biosafety and visitor origin. The potential for traded wildlife to host zoonotic diseases that pose a serious threat to human health was then evaluated at seven markets identified as having high volumes of trade. At the seven markets, during 21 observational surveys, 1,937 alive or fresh dead mammals (approximately 1,009 kg) were observed for sale, including mammals from 12 taxonomic families previously documented to be capable of hosting 36 zoonotic pathogens. In these seven markets, the combination of high wildlife volumes, high risk taxa for zoonoses and poor biosafety increases the potential for pathogen presence and transmission. To examine the potential conservation impact of trade in markets, we assessed the status of 33,752 animals observed during 375 visits to 93 markets, under the Lao PDR Wildlife and Aquatic Law. We observed 6,452 animals listed by Lao PDR as near extinct or threatened with extinction. The combined risks of wildlife trade in Lao PDR to human health and biodiversity highlight the need for a multi-sector approach to effectively protect public health, economic interests and biodiversity.
尽管大多数新发传染病都可追溯到野生动物源头,但如果能更好地了解疾病传播情况并调整相关做法以降低风险,那么大多数病原体传播给人类的事件很可能是可以避免的。野生动物贸易会促使人畜共患病传播,对亚洲的人类健康和经济构成威胁,2003年严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒(SARS-CoV)爆发就是一个例证,当时中国的一个野生动物市场助长了病原体传播。此外,野生动物贸易对生物多样性构成严重威胁。因此,需要评估亚洲野生动物贸易(有时称为丛林肉贸易)对公共卫生和生物多样性的综合影响。2010年至2013年期间,在老挝人民民主共和国收集了野生动物交易市场的观测数据,包括野生动物的交易量、形式、物种和价格信息;市场生物安全情况以及访客来源地。随后,对7个被确定为交易量较大的市场进行了评估,以了解交易野生动物携带对人类健康构成严重威胁的人畜共患病原体的可能性。在这7个市场进行的21次观测调查中,共观察到1937只活体或刚死亡的哺乳动物(约1009千克)在售,其中包括来自12个分类科的哺乳动物,此前有记录表明这些分类科能够携带36种人畜共患病原体。在这7个市场中,野生动物交易量高、人畜共患病高风险分类群以及生物安全措施不力,这些因素加在一起增加了病原体存在和传播的可能性。为了研究市场贸易对保护的潜在影响,我们根据老挝人民民主共和国的《野生动物和水生生物法》,对在93个市场进行375次走访期间观察到的33752只动物的状况进行了评估。我们观察到6452只被老挝人民民主共和国列为近危或濒危的动物。老挝人民民主共和国野生动物贸易对人类健康和生物多样性的综合风险凸显了采取多部门方法有效保护公共卫生、经济利益和生物多样性的必要性。