Boyce John M
J.M. Boyce Consulting, LLC, 62 Sonoma Lane, Middletown, CT 06457 USA.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016 Apr 11;5:10. doi: 10.1186/s13756-016-0111-x. eCollection 2016.
Experts agree that careful cleaning and disinfection of environmental surfaces are essential elements of effective infection prevention programs. However, traditional manual cleaning and disinfection practices in hospitals are often suboptimal. This is often due in part to a variety of personnel issues that many Environmental Services departments encounter. Failure to follow manufacturer's recommendations for disinfectant use and lack of antimicrobial activity of some disinfectants against healthcare-associated pathogens may also affect the efficacy of disinfection practices. Improved hydrogen peroxide-based liquid surface disinfectants and a combination product containing peracetic acid and hydrogen peroxide are effective alternatives to disinfectants currently in widespread use, and electrolyzed water (hypochlorous acid) and cold atmospheric pressure plasma show potential for use in hospitals. Creating "self-disinfecting" surfaces by coating medical equipment with metals such as copper or silver, or applying liquid compounds that have persistent antimicrobial activity surfaces are additional strategies that require further investigation. Newer "no-touch" (automated) decontamination technologies include aerosol and vaporized hydrogen peroxide, mobile devices that emit continuous ultraviolet (UV-C) light, a pulsed-xenon UV light system, and use of high-intensity narrow-spectrum (405 nm) light. These "no-touch" technologies have been shown to reduce bacterial contamination of surfaces. A micro-condensation hydrogen peroxide system has been associated in multiple studies with reductions in healthcare-associated colonization or infection, while there is more limited evidence of infection reduction by the pulsed-xenon system. A recently completed prospective, randomized controlled trial of continuous UV-C light should help determine the extent to which this technology can reduce healthcare-associated colonization and infections. In conclusion, continued efforts to improve traditional manual disinfection of surfaces are needed. In addition, Environmental Services departments should consider the use of newer disinfectants and no-touch decontamination technologies to improve disinfection of surfaces in healthcare.
专家们一致认为,对环境表面进行仔细清洁和消毒是有效感染预防计划的基本要素。然而,医院传统的手动清洁和消毒做法往往并不理想。这部分原因通常是许多环境服务部门遇到的各种人员问题。未遵循消毒剂使用的制造商建议以及一些消毒剂对医疗保健相关病原体缺乏抗菌活性,也可能影响消毒做法的效果。改进的基于过氧化氢的液体表面消毒剂以及含有过氧乙酸和过氧化氢的复合产品是目前广泛使用的消毒剂的有效替代品,而电解水(次氯酸)和冷大气压力等离子体在医院使用方面显示出潜力。通过用铜或银等金属涂覆医疗设备,或应用具有持久抗菌活性表面的液体化合物来创建“自消毒”表面是需要进一步研究的额外策略。更新的“无接触”(自动化)去污技术包括气溶胶和汽化过氧化氢、发射连续紫外线(UV-C)光的移动设备、脉冲氙气紫外线灯系统以及使用高强度窄谱(405纳米)光。这些“无接触”技术已被证明可减少表面的细菌污染。多项研究表明,微冷凝过氧化氢系统与减少医疗保健相关的定植或感染有关,而脉冲氙气系统减少感染的证据则较为有限。最近完成的一项关于连续UV-C光的前瞻性随机对照试验应有助于确定该技术在多大程度上可减少医疗保健相关的定植和感染。总之,需要继续努力改进传统的表面手动消毒。此外,环境服务部门应考虑使用更新的消毒剂和无接触去污技术,以改善医疗保健机构中表面的消毒。