Department of Biology, Behavioural Ecology & Ecophysiology Group, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Department of Biology, Behavioural Ecology & Ecophysiology Group, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610, Wilrijk, Belgium; Faculty of Social Sciences, Antwerp School of Education, University of Antwerp, Venusstraat 35, B-2000, Antwerp, Belgium.
Environ Pollut. 2016 Aug;215:125-134. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.100. Epub 2016 May 12.
Artificial light at night has been linked to a wide variety of physiological and behavioural consequences in humans and animals. Given that little is known about the impact of light pollution on sleep in wild animals, we tested how experimentally elevated light levels affected sleep behaviour of female songbirds rearing 10 day old chicks. Using a within-subject design, individual sleep behaviour was observed over three consecutive nights in great tits (Parus major), with females sleeping in a natural dark situation on the first and third night, whereas on the second night they were exposed to a light-emitting diode (1.6 lux). Artificial light in the nest box dramatically and significantly affected sleep behaviour, causing females to fall asleep later (95 min; while entry time was unaffected), wake up earlier (74 min) and sleep less (56%). Females spent a greater proportion of the night awake and the frequency of their sleep bouts decreased, while the length of their sleep bouts remained equal. Artificial light also increased begging of chicks at night, which may have contributed to the sleep disruption in females or vice versa. The night following the light treatment, females slept 25% more compared to the first night, which was mainly achieved by increasing the frequency of sleep bouts. Although there was a consistent pattern in how artificial light affected sleep, there was also large among-individual variation in how strongly females were affected. When comparing current results with a similar experiment during winter, our results highlight differences in effects between seasons and underscore the importance of studying light pollution during different seasons. Our study shows that light pollution may have a significant impact on sleep behaviour in free-living animals during the reproductive season, which may provide a potential mechanism by which artificial light affects fitness.
人造夜间光已被证实与人类和动物的多种生理和行为后果有关。鉴于人们对光污染对野生动物睡眠的影响知之甚少,我们测试了实验中提高光照水平如何影响正在育雏 10 天的雌性鸣禽的睡眠行为。我们采用了个体内设计,在连续三个晚上观察大蓝山雀(Parus major)的个体睡眠行为,第一晚和第三晚让雌性在自然黑暗的环境中睡觉,而第二晚它们则暴露在发光二极管(1.6 勒克斯)下。巢箱中的人造光显著且极大地影响了鸟类的睡眠行为,导致雌性入睡时间更晚(95 分钟;进入时间不受影响),更早醒来(74 分钟),睡眠时间更短(56%)。雌性在夜间醒来的比例更高,睡眠的频率下降,而睡眠时间则保持不变。人造光还增加了雏鸟夜间的乞食频率,这可能导致了雌性的睡眠中断,或者反之亦然。在光照处理后的夜晚,与第一晚相比,雌性的睡眠时间增加了 25%,这主要是通过增加睡眠的频率实现的。尽管人造光对睡眠的影响模式一致,但雌性受到的影响程度也存在很大的个体差异。当将当前的结果与冬季进行的类似实验进行比较时,我们的结果强调了季节之间的差异以及在不同季节研究光污染的重要性。我们的研究表明,光污染可能会对繁殖季节的自由生活动物的睡眠行为产生重大影响,这可能为人工光如何影响适应性提供了一个潜在的机制。