Sholl Lynette M, Aisner Dara L, Allen Timothy Craig, Beasley Mary Beth, Cagle Philip T, Capelozzi Vera L, Dacic Sanja, Hariri Lida P, Kerr Keith M, Lantuejoul Sylvie, Mino-Kenudson Mari, Raparia Kirtee, Rekhtman Natasha, Roy-Chowdhuri Sinchita, Thunnissen Eric, Tsao Ming, Vivero Marina, Yatabe Yasushi
From the Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Drs Sholl and Vivero); the Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver (Dr Aisner); the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (Dr Allen); the Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York (Dr Beasley); the Department of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, and the Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas (Dr Cagle); the Department of Pathology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil (Dr Capelozzi); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston (Drs Hariri and Mino-Kenudson); the Department of Pathology, Aberdeen University Medical School and Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom (Dr Kerr); the Department of Biopathology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France, and J Fourier University-INSERM U 823-Institut A Bonniot, Grenoble, France (Dr Lantuejoul); the Department of Pathology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois (Dr Raparia); the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (Dr Rekhtman); the Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Roy-Chowdhuri); the Department of Pathology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Dr Thunnissen); the Department of Pathology, University Health Network/Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Dr Tsao); and the Department of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan (Dr Yatabe).
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016 Aug;140(8):825-9. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0163-SA. Epub 2016 May 19.
Liquid biopsy has received extensive media coverage and has been called the holy grail of cancer detection. Attempts at circulating tumor cell and genetic material capture have been progressing for several years, and recent financially and technically feasible improvements of cell capture devices, plasma isolation techniques, and highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction- and sequencing-based methods have advanced the possibility of liquid biopsy of solid tumors. Although practical use of circulating RNA-based testing has been hindered by the need to fractionate blood to enrich for RNAs, the detection of circulating tumor cells has profited from advances in cell capture technology. In fact, the US Food and Drug Administration has approved one circulating tumor cell selection platform, the CellSearch System. Although the use of liquid biopsy in a patient population with a genomically defined solid tumor may potentially be clinically useful, it currently does not supersede conventional pretreatment tissue diagnosis of lung cancer. Liquid biopsy has not been validated for lung cancer diagnosis, and its lower sensitivity could lead to significant diagnostic delay if liquid biopsy were to be used in lieu of tissue biopsy. Ultimately, notwithstanding the enthusiasm encompassing liquid biopsy, its clinical utility remains unproven.
液体活检已受到媒体的广泛报道,并被誉为癌症检测的圣杯。循环肿瘤细胞和遗传物质捕获的研究已进行多年,近年来,细胞捕获装置、血浆分离技术以及基于高灵敏度聚合酶链反应和测序方法在资金和技术上的可行改进,提升了实体瘤液体活检的可能性。尽管基于循环RNA检测的实际应用因需要对血液进行分级分离以富集RNA而受到阻碍,但循环肿瘤细胞的检测受益于细胞捕获技术的进步。事实上,美国食品药品监督管理局已批准了一个循环肿瘤细胞筛选平台——CellSearch系统。尽管在基因组明确的实体瘤患者群体中使用液体活检可能具有潜在的临床价值,但目前它并不能取代肺癌的传统治疗前组织诊断。液体活检尚未被验证可用于肺癌诊断,如果用液体活检代替组织活检,其较低的灵敏度可能会导致显著的诊断延迟。最终,尽管人们对液体活检充满热情,但其临床实用性仍未得到证实。