Segerstrom Suzanne C, Geiger Paul J, Combs Hannah L, Boggero Ian A
Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky.
Psychol Aging. 2016 Sep;31(6):594-604. doi: 10.1037/pag0000104. Epub 2016 May 30.
Socioemotional selectivity theory predicts that when perceived time in life is limited, people will prefer emotionally close social partners over less emotionally rewarding partners. Regulating social choices with regard to time perspective can make the best use of time with regard to well-being. However, doing so may depend on the self-regulatory capacity of the individual. Two studies, 1 with younger adults (N = 101) and 1 with younger (N = 42) and older (N = 39) adults, experimentally tested the effects of time perspective and self-regulatory fatigue on preferences for emotionally close partners and knowledgeable partners. In both studies and across younger and older adults, when self-regulatory fatigue was low, the perception of limited time resulted in a greater preference for close social partners relative to knowledgeable social partners. However, this shift was eliminated by self-regulatory fatigue. In Study 2, when fatigued, younger adults preferred close social partners to knowledgeable partners across time perspectives; older adults preferred close and knowledgeable partners more equally across time perspectives. These findings have implications for social decision-making and satisfaction among people who experience chronic self-regulatory fatigue. They also contradict previous suggestions that only younger adults are susceptible to self-regulatory fatigue. (PsycINFO Database Record
社会情感选择性理论预测,当人们意识到生命中的时间有限时,会更倾向于选择情感上亲密的社交伙伴,而非情感回报较少的伙伴。从时间视角来调节社交选择,能够在幸福安康方面充分利用时间。然而,这样做可能取决于个体的自我调节能力。两项研究,一项针对年轻成年人(N = 101),另一项针对年轻成年人(N = 42)和年长成年人(N = 39),通过实验测试了时间视角和自我调节疲劳对情感亲密伙伴和知识渊博伙伴偏好的影响。在这两项研究中,涵盖了年轻和年长成年人,当自我调节疲劳程度较低时,相对于知识渊博的社交伙伴,对有限时间的感知会导致对亲密社交伙伴有更强的偏好。然而,这种转变会因自我调节疲劳而消除。在研究2中,当感到疲劳时,年轻成年人在不同时间视角下都更倾向于亲密社交伙伴而非知识渊博的伙伴;年长成年人在不同时间视角下对亲密和知识渊博伙伴的偏好更为均衡。这些发现对于经历慢性自我调节疲劳的人群的社会决策和满意度具有启示意义。它们也与之前认为只有年轻成年人易受自我调节疲劳影响的观点相矛盾。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》